Category Archives: Health related

MMS, the HeLa Menace, and a New Hypothesis

There are some very compelling reasons for being clear on how and why MMS and the chlorite matrix works that are bigger than Grant Maanum and myself, or Jim Humble. It is easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the benefit that others gain from our works means that we, or our “product” did it for them. If we become so self-absorbed, everyone ultimately loses, with the actual gain never measuring up to the potential, or the need. As such, my search will take me wherever common sense leads, not only among outside sources, but within, not relying solely on established conventions of thought, but to consider new perspectives, and see if they reveal greater truths.

Yesterday I spent some time studying the F.W. Kühne patent, (No. 6,086,922) that was awarded for the “Use of a Chemically-Stabilized Matrix for the Parenteral Treatment of HIV Infections”. The product was subsequently called WF10. Filed March 19, 1993, the application was awarded July 11, 2000.

“Parenteral treatment” refers to methods of delivering nutrition or medication by other than oral intake, bypassing the alimentary system which includes the gastrointestinal tract, through intravenous or intramuscular injection.

Even if you are unfamiliar with biochemistry or biophysics, certain truths about the chlorine dioxide subject, vis-à-vis the chemical nature of MMS, will reveal themselves at first exposure, to anyone truly seeking understanding. I’ll say right off that to me, these truths prove the efficacy of the MMS idea.

The usually cited sources of information on chlorine dioxide, of which Lenntech and The Sabre Companies are prime examples, correctly describe the chemical dynamics of chlorine dioxide. Said description is appropriate given their business objectives and sectors; commercial operations that include bleaching (paper), and various forms of disinfection, e.g., foods, produce, odor control, or environmental remediation.

While it is becoming increasingly synthetic and man-made, the human body cannot yet be classified as inorganic, as it is teaming with life. I dare say that the most important, and yet most overlooked elements inside the human body are the many species of living human cells. By and through their health, they make a healthy life possible for each of us.

The “invention” that was officially recorded as Patent 6086922 was applied for by, and awarded to a scientist whose intent was use it in vivo, or within a living human organism from the very beginning. As such, the care by which he moves through the chemical landscape, with respect to what effects are, or are not sought is especially meaningful.

A Clear difference between ClO₂ and ClO₂-

From the very beginning, Dr. Kühne expresses his intention to formulate and use what he referred to as the chlorite matrix, which he describes as an isotonic solution that contains ClO₂-. Everywhere in the abstract it is clear that his intent is to produce ClO₂- and not ClO₂.

By taking the time to examine some of the other cited patents, and then even earlier patents that they cite, it becomes evident that a progression of understanding has been, and continues to be at play. In other words, new levels of understanding can be seen between a patent issued in 1951 and 1993. For example, consider the first references to chlorine dioxide, shown as ClO₂, which represents a chlorine atom bonded to two atoms of oxygen. The molecule was observed to be highly unstable or reactive. If you wanted to blow something up, that could be a good thing, depending on what it was.

With further experience it was discovered that ClO₂ has another chemical side. The same molecular components are present, but it possesses a negative charge. It was designated ClO₂-, and referred to as chlorite. In an earlier patent (No. 4,507,285), Dr. Kühne described the molecule as “stabilized activated oxygen which is incorporated in a matrix of chlorite ions.”

Oxygen, as is known, is the prerequisite for the formation of chemical energy in the living cell, for example, in the formation of adenosine triphosphate. Oxygen deficiency leads to various deficiency diseases and complaints during advance age. Moreover, oxygen shortage in the tissue areas involved also leads to a severe drop in the pH value.

Sound pretty familiar, eh?

Dr. Kühne surmised that the problem could be solved by means of a “stabilized oxygen enclosed in a matrix of chlorite ions.” The “matrix” of chlorite ions (Cl-) surround the oxygen, thereby making stability possible. Given the dramatic potential that chlorine dioxide could bring outside the cell, it is possible we haven’t previously explored what benefit a stable oxygen and chlorite combination might bring within it.

…because the oxygen according to the invention participates directly in the oxygen transport and outstandingly and to a hitherto unattained degree, supports the function of hemoglobin during the transport of oxygen into the cells. It is also well tolerated physiologically.

Moreover, the stabilized activated oxygen according to the invention is in a position to normalize again a lowered pH value. As a result, all of the processes associated with the cell membrane such as the energy production of the cell, the immunological processes or enzyme reactions are influenced. The stiffening of erythrocyte membranes is eliminated and erythrocyte flexibility is restored.

For anyone now on chemotherapy or radiation therapy, just as an example, contrast the above described cellular changes with the indiscriminate devastation that today’s Medical Standard of Care for cancer requires.

The stabilized activated oxygen of the invention, which is enclosed in a matrix of chlorite ions, can be produced by reacting a chlorite, such as sodium chlorite, in an aqueous solution with a hypochlorite, such as sodium hypochlorite.

Dr. Kühne’s chemical process for “stabilizing” the oxygen, which also included the reduction/elimination of chlorine dioxide, took 4-6 weeks to achieve, using the chemical elements described in the patent.Remember that the concoction that Jim Humble first made when the men on his expedition contracted malaria, was created from that stabilized, meaning chlorine dioxide free, solution.

Dr. Kühne took careful steps to prevent and suppress the formation of sodium chlorate, which we now understand produces a different species of ClO₂ than when only chlorite is involved. That is also why dichloroacetate (DCA), is produced with pure sodium chlorite.

Dr. Kühne’s recipe differs slightly from the one used to produce MMS. However, the purpose and principles of use are the same; i.e., the safe and effective application inside the human body. “Safe” not just to the human being as a whole, but to the cell.

Kühne cites another patent worth noting here. Patent No. 5,019,402 discloses:

a solution containing a chlorine dioxide or a chlorine dioxide-liberating mixture or a chlorite, a weakly acidic buffer and a heat-activated saccharide which can be used for the sterilization of stored blood components with the exception of those which contain red blood corpuscles, i.e., of leukocytes, blood platelets, coagulation factors and globulins.

He states that in whole blood, disinfection does not occur because the red blood corpuscles are more quickly attacked by the chlorine dioxide than the investigating microorganisms. For those reasons, he felt it was not suitable for a parenteral administration.

He felt that his own previous patent (No. 4,507,285) was suitable for external or oral therapeutic use, but not intravenously.

As I continue forth, I recall Jim Humble stating that it took too long to produce stabilized oxygen according to the schedule outlined in Dr. Kühne’s recipe. He wanted to develop a way to produce it quickly. Surmising that anaerobic microorganisms and pathogens were the actual cause of diseases and that chlorine dioxide could rapidly reduce them without introducing new toxicity, it makes sense why he believes ClO₂ is the beneficial agent. Given the results that were achieved through Dr. Kühne’s work on WF10 and the earlier work with DCA, wherein Cornford et al (1971) demonstrated that the chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) molecule was not present, there is sufficient evidence to entertain a hypothesis that equally remarkable results, if not even greater, may be possible if a chlorine dioxide detoxifying strategy were embraced with respect to the presentation and understanding of MMS.

This does not diminish anything that Jim Humble has done. He is a human being whose greatest gift to humanity is that he has tirelessly striven to bring something to our attention that would help us all. He did it well enough to have helped millions. Our medieval medical system is pursuing and enforcing treatment policies and practices that will not only harm humanity, but jeopardizes what it means to be human. The plan is not only in effect, but has been so for decades.

Are We Moving Toward a Mythological Reality?

Lateral Gene Transfer is a term that didn’t exist before the early 1950’s. On a planet that has existed for 4.6 billion years, do you ever wonder why purported “human history” goes back only 5-6,000 years?

And what about the labyrinthine body of information that we know as mythology, which is replete with beings that exist in hybrid-human configurations?

If you want a way to conceptualize lateral gene transfer, this is it. The human genome was designed to be inviolate. That was changed when the HeLa cell came along.

Notice how the year 1951 is cited as when the first papers on the subject were published? This tracks with the same time that the HeLa was purported to have come from the cervical cancer tumor of one Henrietta Lacks (1920-1951).

It is EASY to dismiss the HeLa, as results such as these may be unlikely. Yet, science, technology companies (e.g., Monsanto), government policies, enforced by alphabet agencies such as the FDA, and medical practices are increasingly experimenting with all of us, with neither our knowledge, nor our consent. No one asked me if I wanted to be vaccinated. Parents are told their children can’t go to public school unless they “submit” to vaccination.

Knowing when to say “NO!”, and what to say it to

May not be a figment of an artist’s imagination anymore.

This photo of a sculpture by Patricia Piccinin from the book, Art, Myth, and Ritual in Classic Greece (Barringer 2008) may creep you out, but it presents what has become a real possibility through the auspices of lateral gene transfer.

This isn’t going to affect you or me in such a dramatic way today. It’s the future of humanity that weighs in the balance.

Genetically speaking, we are what we are, and that’s a good thing because the Original Design is perfect and inviolate. However, the indiscriminate and unbridled proliferation of products that use lateral gene transfer, thanks to HeLa cell influences is, and has been ongoing for decades now. We’re part of a holocaust that we’ve not seen or arrested. Instead of arresting the people who are making it happen, we are respecting them, listening to their directives, and obeying them without question.

Our opportunity, as a human species, is to respect the Design, the Designer, and each other enough, is to stop the adulteration. Our responsibility as individuals, is to know ourselves and become stewards and guardians of our personal temples (the human body and the trillions of lifeforms that live within it). The reward is sustained and/or restored health and longevity.

In addition to cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, this is more likely the kind of anomalous physical phenomena that we’ll see in our generation thanks to lateral gene transfer, courtesy of HeLa cells. These have all been considered acceptable consequences to the Medical Autocracy. Since we hadn’t noticed, they’ve had nothing and no one to answer to.

Morgellons… legions, fibers, rapid shifts in location…

Morgellons disease is certainly a HeLa-related effect of lateral gene transfer that is touching more lives. Notice where it has been prevalent.

Would you be surprised if autism and Alzheimer’s also skewed heavily in the same regions of the world?

In addition to being carcinogenic, HeLa cells are mutagenic and neurotoxins. After breaking the bond that holds the two chromosomal strands together with its 15 million volt per meter field, they change DNA information. They have also opened the door for other thugs, gangsters and thieves.

That’s why and how Monsanto scientists could “break in” to the information-set of corn and insert instructions that make the strain tolerant to their “Roundup” or other glyphosate-based product. This made the corn seed patent-protectable, and caused farmers to overload their soils with pesticides, which deplete said soils of natural nutrients and contaminate water tables.

There are plenty who are blowing whistles on the other subjects, but not many on this one. It seems far-fetched until you examine what’s happening right in front of our eyes. Every vaccine has HeLa cell elements. They cause Hepatitis B and open the door for years of disease susceptibility due to a chemically compromised immune system, thanks to standard medical process

It wouldn’t be worth writing all this if it couldn’t be changed. We can fix it all, first by realizing that the real problem isn’t whether Jim Humble, Grant Maanum, or I am “right” about MMS. If you know what HeLa cells do, and are doing, you can say “no” to anything that contains them. There’s precious little literature available on the HeLa cell that shows it in this context. A Conspiracy of Cells (1986 SUNY Press), by Michael Gold is one. Grant’s book, Birth, Net Worth, Cold Earth (2013 Phaelos Books), will be another. I’m considering writing my own book and producing a new documentary on the chlorite matrix, and also cover this subject.

Secondly, you can take measures to inactivate HeLa that are likely to be present within your body. This will not be done by blowing holes in bacteria. However, a detoxified chlorine dioxide solution using the chlorite matrix has been shown to inactivate HeLa cells. (DMSO has done so too.)

Speaking to Grant the other day, he commented that, if the Krebs Cycle is operating properly within each cell, there can be no disease. He also said that the Krebs Cycle is bidirectional, meaning that dysfunction can be restored, and if so, it will self-repair.

We are still stepping through the new hypothesis of how the body might heal itself from a cellular context if chlorine dioxide troops are not present and involved in an extracellular war.

The answer is coming into view.

—————-

A Conversation

This conversation was on September 30, 2012 (74 minutes)

MMS: No Need to Circle the Wagons

25 Replies

It comes as no surprise that the first official response to my latest articles on MMS chemistry would amount to a circling of the wagons, as though I had attacked the Doctrine. Given what I’ve learned recently, I am saying that Chlorine Dioxide, or ClO₂ should indeed be avoided, and IS being avoided when MMS that contains no sodium chlorate is used. Given what I’ve learned, I am also saying that MMS that is free of sodium chlorate is a formulation that avoids or minimizes ClO₂ exposure, hastening the natural cascade that leads to the production of ClO₂- and Cl-.

If there is no sodium chlorate in the MMS, there would be no issues with the FDA, due to the particular ClO₂- species that is produced.

This doesn’t make me a critic, or even critical of either MMS or Jim Humble. However, he’s taking it as though I am. After signing up to follow me on Twitter (@phaelosopher), then leaving a long comment in the thread Rethinking MMS: A Cell’s Eye View this morning, he sent me this personal message. I’m sure that Grant will have his own take on this, but I will comment below as I feel it appropriate.

Adam,

You and Grant just ignored my last email a couple of months ago. Now you have put out reams of junk. You have just bought everything Grant has said hook line and sinker. Sodium Chlorite has been being used in the US for 80 years and has have(?) very little effect on health.

While I didn’t ignore it, it might as well had been so, since I didn’t reply to Jim’s last email, sent a few weeks ago. However, after receiving his email I wrote and published MMS: No Desire for Drama, Just Beneficial Results (09/20/2012). I’ve listened to Grant more than anyone connected with this idea would have been willing to, or have the temerity to publish without first seeking permission. Grant told me this morning that he attempted to contact Jim directly well over a year ago, but did not receive a response. His knowledge of biochemistry and biophysics is far deeper than mine, or what anyone would expect from a layman, but he has not tried to “tell” me anything. Instead, he has shown me where the information is that supports or explains what he’s saying. It’s buried in scholarly papers and scientific databases, and are on point to the application, i.e., biochemistry; not general commercial or industrial uses.

I told you that chlorite is not yellow. You just chose to ignore that fact. Chlorine dioxide gas is yellow or yellowish green and it is yellow when dissolved in water. Chlorite is not colored in water and definitely it is not yellow. And if it actually kills pathogens it is not by blowing a hole in the side of pathogens. For a year and a half I had a dark field microscope and you could see that the pathogens were killed by destruction of the outer layer of the pathogen.

The yellow color may not be conclusive proof that chlorine dioxide (ClO₂), is in the water. It can come from a number of other minerals, including dissolved organic carbon. We also know that the ClO₂ molecule REMAINS in the water, however as ClO₂-. Something is different about that molecule beyond the minus sign, which determines or affects its behavior. The chemicals selected to generate the ClO₂ determine what the species, and as such, the differences in its behavior are.

If I understand you correctly, you’re saying that chlorite not being yellow in water is proof that it’s not there. Yet, every document that I’ve read on the subject states that ClO₂ becomes ClO₂-, which becomes Cl-. Every document I’ve read refers to ClO₂- as “chlorite.”

Sir Humphrey Davy

None of the usual commercial sources of chlorine dioxide information, such as Lenntech and The Sabre Companies are concerned with preparing a solution for human intake. Their recipes are different. They use sodium chlorate as well as sodium chlorite. In 1814, Sir Humphrey Davy used potassium chlorate and sulfuric acid. I’ve found around 11 different recipes for generating the chlorine dioxide molecule. Each one produces its own unique species, with unique properties.

Here’s an example of a commercial recipe.

If all Chlorine Dioxide are the same, then why isn’t MMS produced with the same compounds that Lenntech and Sabre use, just scaled down to smaller proportions? That would make sense if all ClO₂ were the same.

I don’t care how you decided on the MMS formula. Whether by happenstance or not, we’re saying that independent scientific research, starting with Cornford, et. al, in 1971, affirms that you chose a recipe that is right for the application. The people who studied the properties of that particular species of chlorine dioxide have confirmed that the switch from a highly reactive ClO₂ to to a highly therapeutic ClO₂- state, happens in less than 1/2 second. Apparently, the ClO₂ last longer in other species.

The benefit of acknowledging this distinction is to be able to cite independent proof that the FDA’s assertions of MMS harm, (i.e., “potent bleach”), are specious. Given their motives and mindset, the people who run the agency are likely to change their position, so it makes sense to inform The People, to give them greater confidence to use MMS in these the times of change.

You can draw all the pictures of all the things in the pathogen you want, but the kill is by blowing a hole in the side of the pathogen. That has been proven time and again with dark field microscopes. I had one of the most expensive dark field microscopes that money can buy at my use for a year and a half in Mexico. And that is what I saw. LENNTEK has been using chlorine dioxide to kill pathogens for 50 years. Their chemical technology is not surpassed by Grant.

What do you or anyone care about where “the kill” actually happens? Why would this need to be the litmus test of what is “right?” “Conclusion by microscope” is problematic for what you don’t see, in this case, the cellular dynamics inside the body, before and after MMS intake.

I just learned that cells exhale carbon dioxide (CO₂) after taking in Cl-. With up to 100 trillion cells, it’s no wonder that we let out ClO_2.when we exhale. Conclusions are based both on what we look for, and what we overlook. I acknowledge having overlooked cellular dynamics for the five years I’ve been around this story, since it has never been mentioned. And yet, it’s the most exciting one.

The bottom-line for me is that MMS can and should help hundreds of millions more than the 10 million that have discovered and tried it in the past five years. And as more people awaken to the HeLa cell attack we’ve been under for 60 years, they’ll want it even more. But it’s got to be the right formulation.

What do you two think you are proving anyway? You should join Silver Fox and make another hundred people be afraid to use MMS. Do you think I haven’t restudied the subject time and again? Well you are wrong because I have. EVEN IF YOU ARE RIGHT, YOU ARE GOING ABOUT IT ALL WRONG. You are scaring people and that means there will be some that go on suffering.

It’s not a matter of what you studied, but where you looked. I searched the same sites as you for my chlorine dioxide education, but they were commercial applications. If you found one like this example, you might think twice:

Detoxification of chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) by ascorbic acid in aqueous solutions: ESR studies

Abstract

Chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) which was easily prepared from dissolving sodium chlorite (NaClO₂) in acidic aqueous solutions can oxidize l-ascorbic acid (AsA) to give the short-lived intermediate, ascorbic acid free radical (AFR). The detection of the ascorbate radical was made by using the electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy coupled with a rapid-mixing flow technique which enabled us to detect radicals having a life-time of 5–100 ms at room temperature. This result indicates that the ascorbic acid becomes a suitable reagent for detoxification of the ClO₂, which is remaining in drinking water, in the living body.¹ Ozawa, Kwan

The above study was published in the Feb 1987 edition of Water Research. It both supports and confirms the assertion that it is possible to detoxify of ClO₂ with a mind toward human consumption or use.

How many people do you think the folk at the FDA have made afraid of MMS with its generalized and inappropriate warning of its “danger?” Why are you trying to raise money for a “legal defense” fund? Why does he fear for his family? Could it be that focusing solely on the “kill” properties of a generic ClO₂overshadows a more remarkable, but unexamined natural process that occurs when a specific ClO₂ species is formulated?

If it could be shown that there is no real danger of chlorine dioxide exposure by using MMS, due to the particular species that is being formulated, and said non-toxicity has been proven via independent scientific study, wouldn’t that remove the need to circle the wagons and go into “defend” mode at the drop of a hat?

I am not a critic of you nor MMS. Simple fact is that I was open to learn more from someone more knowledgeable than me on the subject, in order to perpetuate and build on what you started. IF this new interpretation is correct, which the research suggests that it is, it will take away a huge excuse that naysayers, including “naturopathic types,” have offered about MMS. It would accelerate growth.

The fact is MMS makes a good bleach and I have bleached a lot of cotton with it and then used it to cure diseases from the same bottle after the bleach was accomplished. DO YOU GET IT, THE SAME BOTTLE THAT BLEACHED COTTON ALSO WE CURED DISEASES WITH IT. TIME AND AGAIN OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS I’VE DONE THAT. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET AROUND THAT?

Yes Jim, I get it. Why don’t you mix up some sodium chlorate, and hydrochloric acid in an MMS bottle. It will produce chlorine dioxide, but do you want to use it on humans? All chlorine dioxides are not the same, nor do they behave the same chemically. You chose one that helps miracles happen. However, you’re presenting it in such a way that gives some people reasonable doubt. I am bringing this up to remove doubt… to help people be clear what will and will not help them.

I would ignore you guys except you are doing vast damage to MMS and if anyone that is sick decides not to use it because of you then you have caused suffering and maybe death. I’m the expert on MMS and yet you go to someone who probably hasn’t healed a single person. And he is going to tell you that he can use MMS2 to heal cancer and in many cases he cannot. I’ve healed a thousand cancer cases if you count those over the phone and email. YOU WERE A HELP AT FIRST, BUT NOW YOU ARE DOING MORE DAMAGE AND PROBABLY YOU WILL CANCEL THE GOOD THAT YOU DID BEFORE THIS IS OVER.

Each is responsible for his or her actions and inactions. I am comfortable with mine. I saw value in you and your work, and have not changed. MMS use should be expanded. However, the science needs to be shored up, such as

by acknowledging, embracing, and citing existing scientific findings,
demonstrating an understanding of ClO₂ species,
specifying that ALL MMS shall be sodium chlorate free (28% solution for 80% and 23% solution for pure sodium chlorite),
emphasizing that with the reagent the solution is detoxified,
moving away from the pathogen “kill” story and giving credit to the restored cell
consider returning to the 10% reagent and the 5:1 ratio.

If you had been willing to listen to Grant when he contacted you directly, perhaps the reasons behind why these suggestions are helpful would have been seen and this exchange wouldn’t unnecessary.

All three of us agree on two things;

You da man, and
MMS is valuable and its use should be expanded.

Whether or not you agree on how I am going about doing it, Grant and I both honor you for what you have done, and the many yet to be helped by MMS.

It dawns on me. Become a MMS advocate and then all of a sudden find terrible things wrong. People are more likely to believe you were an advocate at first. Being a critic of MMS might pay better and get you better known, but it generates karma that must be paid. If you keep this up, I will explain to the world.

Jim

I hope I’ve made it clear to you that I am not a “critic,” yet you’re free to see things as you will. No one is “paying” me to present this viewpoint, as has been the case for the over 100 articles that I’ve written on MMS over the past five years. I am part of why 10 million people have chosen to use it. MMS will not “win” a fight with the FDA by claiming that chlorine dioxide is the central killer in its work. By looking beyond pathogen killing and exploring cellular restoration, which has been proven to apply, the “dangerous” label could be transcended altogether.

Respectfully,

Adam…

Trying to sum it up.

MMS: No Desire for Drama, Just Beneficial Results

1 Reply

It would be impossible to convey, even in a few thousand words, the profound shift that has occurred in my thinking as a result of ongoing interactions with Grant Maanum. Our conversations haven’t been limited to matters of MMS in the least. However, the importance of what MMS can do for humanity is so great that it behooves us to take a critical look at any measure that could possibly compromise it, even before getting to the main issue at hand, which is the multifaceted disintegration of the Human DNA at the hands of an unwitting orthodox science through its promulgation of the HeLa cell and derivative technologies.

In the process of discovering this threat, and because of it, Grant has invested quite a bit of time and energy to help people better understand, and hence get the best results from their MMS use with no economic motive or compensation whatsoever. He has done so, not by attempting to establish himself as the new arbiter of methods, but to call the public’s attention to a clinically proven and scientifically confirmed approach that could act as a reliable, science-based baseline. That has not been an easy task. But then, I can think of few worthwhile tasks where the term “easy” applies.

We have discussed the matter of adding baking soda to MMS. More thoughts have been recorded. A question as to the chemical efficacy of the new Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS) protocol developed by Andreas Kalcker has also been raised, though not commented on here as of yet. I’m not here to judge anyone. I simply want the products that people take to actually give them what they are seeking, secure in the knowledge that we’ve dotted every “I” and crossed every “t”. Chemically speaking, there is a difference between chlorine dioxide and its ionic counterpart that we need to know and understand. This is not a commercial application, but for a living biological system.

In each of these approaches, “successes” have been observed and reported. However, true success means being able to answer what can sometimes be a long list of questions in a satisfactory manner. Thanks to Grant I am beginning to see new questions to ask, based on his 10+ years of study. The town where he lives is one of the largest producers of industrial chlorine dioxide in the world. He has experienced, first hand, both the harmful effects of chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) toxicity and the curative/restorative effects of the chlorite matrix (ClO_2-).

Most people are unaware that there is a difference within the chemical species that is chlorine dioxide. I certainly didn’t know it. Most are unaware that much of the curative activity that needs to happen when a metabolic dysfunction turns into a full-blown disease, occurs within the cell. My view of chlorine dioxide was as a cluster of oxygen-equipped warriors that entered the body and destroyed the low voltage, anaerobic overgrowth that they encountered by commandeering up to five electrons from their microscopic-sized “enemies.”

Now, intracellular environments, requirements, and dynamics must be considered, as well as the extracellular, and in spite of the many detractors against MMS who call it “bleach”, the chlorine ion (Cl^-) is of critical importance to the proper inner workings of every cell. Specially in the presence of, but not limited to, the chlorite matrix (ClO_2-).

Why is this important?

The importance in all this is in the fact that the chlorite matrix (ClO_2-) is a vital and necessary ingredient in the proper functioning of the Krebs Cycle, which is routinely compromised by the preponderance of nutrient deficient and chemically processed products that we consume or are exposed to. Just take a shower each day and you prove my point. Vaccines, genetic engineering, fracking, “smart meters,” and many other “technological advancements” exacerbate an already dicey situation, health-wise. In MMS, as originally formulated, Jim Humble gave us a way to economically produce the chlorite matrix (ClO_2-). However, we – or at least I have thought that chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) was the same thing.

According to the Cornford, Frost, Herring & McDowell (1971) work, ClO₂ is produced when you add acid – they used acetic, but it works with citric, lactic, ascorbic, and humic acids too. The chlorine dioxide, which normally lasts 300,000 years due to its very tight bonding, was broken up in an instant by the acid, which essentially removed the “radical” character of the molecule, leaving the part that can repair and heal; the chlorite matrix (ClO_2-).

Here’s more about chlorine dioxide, from the EPA’s Guidance Manual, dated April 1999:

Chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) is a neutral compound of chlorine in the +IV oxidation state. It disinfects by oxidation; however, it does not chlorinate. It is a relatively small, volatile, and highly energetic molecule, and a free radical even while in dilute aqueous solutions. At high concentrations, it reacts violently with reducing agents. However, it is stable in dilute solution in a closed container in the absence of light (AWWA, 1990).* Chlorine dioxide functions as a highly selective oxidant due to its unique, one-electron transfer mechanism where it is reduced to chlorite (ClO_2-) (Hoehn et al., 1996).

The pKa for the chlorite ion, chlorous acid equilibrium, is extremely low at pH 1.8. This is remarkably different from the hypochlorous acid/hypochlorite base ion pair equilibrium found near neutrality, and indicates the chlorite ion will exist as the dominant species in drinking water. The oxidation reduction of some key reactions are (CRC, 1990):

^*This chlorine dioxide was produced by interacting sodium chlorate (NaClO₃) and the very harsh sulfuric acid.

Notice that chlorite is acknowledged as its own distinct identity, described chemically as “ClO_2-.” Chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) becomes chlorite (ClO_2-) via “reduction” with a specific form of acid when applied to a 28% Sodium Chlorite (NaClO_2-) solution. The acid does two things:

separates the chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) from the sodium (Na)
reduces it to chlorite (ClO_2-)

If there is absolutely NO sodium chlorate (NaClO_3-) present in your source material, then you’re good to go. If there is, then chlorine dioxide will be present too.

The documents like the one excerpted from the EPA, which lays out ground rules for various methods of municipal water treatment may go the way of the dinosaur, as critical information, such as how sodium chlorate must not be present, is coming up missing. It has happened before, as “history” is constantly being revised.

I’ve examined Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for 80% sodium chlorite that MMS producers use. In remaining approximately 20%, sodium chloride (NaCl or salt), sodium carbonate (Na₂CO₃), and sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄) are present in varying percentages. I found small amounts of sodium chlorate (NaClO₃) from one Asian source. NO amount of sodium chlorate is ever acceptable.

The Cornford tests were performed with 99% pure sodium chlorite. Barring that, the sodium chlorite that the producer uses to produce MMS must contain NO sodium chlorate.

In order to begin to explain differences that some people have reported – specifically related to extreme reactions – a standard must be understood to exist among MMS producers, even to the point of ensuring that their source sodium chlorite is of such a quality as to have NO sodium chlorate. This helps eliminate questions down the road.

One of the MMS suppliers in Europe, not knowing this, sent me his ingredient list because he wanted to know. It contained the following:

Cloratos = Chlorate = Sodium Chlorate.
NaClO = Sodium Chlorite.
NaOH = Sodium Hydroxide.
NaCl = Sodium Chloride
Na₂CO₃ = Sodium Carbonate.

I sent it to Grant, who responded with the following analysis:

Yes, Sodium Chlorate is present, less than 8 g/L, and reacted produces ClO₂.

NaOH is sodium hydroxide. We call it Lye.

NaOH will react with the citric acid, and because of being a strong base, the monosodium, disodium, and trisodium will fall away. The monosodium is then available to form MSG.

Na₂CO₃ is Sodium Carbonate, which produced exactly the same issues as sodium Bicarbonate when reacted. In fact, the chemical equation is EXACTLY the same.

So you may be getting a feel for how complex this is. With regard to the production, preparation, therapeutic and/or clinical use of chlorite (ClO_2-), standards are needed among and within the MMS community that cover everything from material’s, product production standards and practices, to metabolic assumptions and outcomes. Perhaps it’s being done already, but there appears to be room for improvement.

New Context vs. the FDA Warning on MMS

If the conventions and controls recommended above are considered, observed and confirmed, this awareness would take the “danger” out of the FDA warning, which sounded an alarm about the production and consumption of chlorine dioxide. The FDA warning focused on chlorine dioxide because all the literature and presentations, mine included, said that this is what was being produced and getting the results. That was my best understanding of what I read and experienced. The amazing improvements that so many people have reported, along with Jim’s instruction and corroborating information I found, was good enough for me.

Grant’s discovery of the Cornford, et. al tests presented a plausible and documented alternative story about what was going on. Their emission spectroscopy results confirmed that no chlorine dioxide was present once the acetic acid activator was applied. Chlorine dioxide had been released for an instant, leaving chlorite behind in a stabilized form. The chlorite is safe, non-toxic, and therapeutic, and vital to the Krebs Cycle. It also destroys HeLa cells. This may not mean much to you now, but it will, once you know what HeLa cells are doing.

Chlorine dioxide cannot and will not help intracellular function. The chlorite ion is required for proper cell function. Oxo Chemie’s WF10 trials showed complete restoration of T-cell production and cell function in four patients who had advanced stages of HIV/AIDS, after a very specific program that spanned 9-weeks. All five of the listed acids are not required to achieve similar effects. However, I am acknowledging what has proven to worked before, proven scientifically, and will let it be my foundation for moving forward.

The effort to establish this bit of common ground regarding the productive use of MMS allows us to deal with real value that it represents, when properly prepared and administered; in its ability to destroy HeLa cells and the damage that they have been, and are doing to human DNA.

Baking Soda-Gate, Part II

9 Replies

I am pleased to report that the YouTube video with Jim Humble showing how to add baking soda to MMS to make it taste palatable has been removed. However, a second copy of the same video is still online, which was posted by someone else on June 17, 2012.

Viewer beware… STILL.

That’s the simple part.

Yesterday I received email replies from both Jim Humble and Dr. Ron Neer, the gentleman seated with him in the video. I wrote to Jim privately and asked him to take the video down and recant the advice regarding using baking soda to abate the taste. In informing me that they removed the video, Jim’s letter suggested it was in spite of my urging, rather than because of it. He went on to correct what he saw as errors in our reasoning. Given the limited exposure that both of them have had to anything we’ve said on this subject compared to what they have done, their responses and skepticism are reasonable, and to be expected. So while I have my own opinions about what each says, I am going to publish them both, without editing, rebuttal, or comment.

Not knowing the basis of the suggestion to not use baking soda with one’s MMS intake, it’s also easy for both of them to assume that neither “my source” nor I have “the full picture.” Fortunately for us, we don’t assume that we do. However, we have an element of, as well as a perspective on “the picture” that few have even considered, referring to the HeLa cell, which is affecting everyone, and needs to be known, acknowledged, and dealt with, else the infecting injecting of humankind will continue with our permission.

Perhaps this is the beginning.

Before we get on to the responses, I have also recorded two more conversations with Grant (the latest one lasting 2-hours this morning), specifically on points made in Dr. Neer’s and Jim Humble’s emails below. In the process I gained a better understanding of the power of the chlorite species and the distinction between chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) and the chlorite matrix (ClO_2-).

This was brought out in research done in 1971 by Cornford, Herring, Frost & McDowell, of the University of British Columbia, as they explored the chemical nature of Dichloroacetate (DCA), which itself was first proven in clinical practice in London, 1936.

MMS could be considered a grandchild or analog of DCA, as both compounds involve the detoxification of sodium chlorite (ClO_2-), with a light acid. Not just any light acid, but research has shown that detoxification is achieved with any one from the list below:

acetic
ascorbic
humic
citric
lactic

In the Cornford tests, 10% acetic acid (1 part acetic acid to 9 parts distilled water) was applied in a distilled water solution which was forced through a high-speed jet, like a car wash sprayer, to mix with a 28% solution of 99.9% pure sodium chlorite (NaClO₂) under equal pressure at a 45% angles to each other.

High-speed “mixing” of sodium chorite and acetic acid.

The above image provides a visual impression of the electron spectroscopy tests that were run.

It is possible that each acid has its own area of effectiveness, which may be why Oxo Chemie’s WF10 used all five on its HIV/AIDS trails. The original attacks on DCA were likewise based on the assumption that chlorine dioxide was being produced. The case against this assumption was proven by Cornford, Herring, et. al, but was not publicized.

The Chlorite Matrix (ion) with the minus sign.

I will comment on the replies below after I finish producing the first of our conversations on the chemical ramifications of adding baking soda to MMS. Takes much more time when there is no image to work from, but I’m getting through it.

I debated whether I should just send the audio as it is, but have decided against doing so because the HeLa cell factors in to this equation as an issue that few, even in the medical industry, are aware, or think is problematic. It is, in my opinion, a greater problem for humanity than our present debt crisis. For reasons that will unfold, it is critically important that if a person takes MMS, they actually get what MMS can do for them.

Grant has been very clear that the way Jim originally formulated MMS, which he believes had no sodium chlorate involved, would be perfectly safe because it follows the example set by both DCA and WF10. The 1971 work of Cornford Frost Herring, & McDowell proved the non-toxicity of the chlorite matrix through emission spectroscopy which showed that the chlorine dioxide species (ClO_2-) was formed, but disappeared in less than 1/3 of a second. This is in stark contrast to the 300,000 year life of chlorine dioxide (ClO₂).

As such, I am adding visual information to support the audio, so as to help the listener/viewer better appreciate the authenticity and weight of the problem, and the context and importance of effective solutions, which includes, but is not limited to, properly administered MMS and DMSO.

While I finish preparing the video, here is a short selection from today’s conversation, discussing three specific points:

the research that supports these recommendations, which go back to 1971,
the HeLa cell, and
the chemical effects of adding baking soda.

Here is Jim Humble’s response:

Adam,
It would have been nice if you guys had checked with me before starting to throw things on the internet indiscriminately before knowing what you are talking about. Luckily you got enough stuff right that it isn’t all wrong.
I have been going to take Ron’s stuff off of Utube and anywhere else for some time, just now got around to it.
Your logic is flawed in a number of places. Fortunately that does not make you completely wrong and the same with your “Source that you trust.”
The first point is where you say that MMS sodium chlorite puts oxygen into the system. Well that is totally incorrect. MMS brings no oxygen to the system what-so-ever. When the chlorine dioxide molecule destroys a molecule it is itself destroyed. The two oxygen atoms that are released are released as carbon dioxide. Oxygen atoms, yes, but they have no power as oxygen. The reason that the chlorine dioxide ion kills pathogens is because it is positively charged and it attracts the negative electrons of the pathogen. Electrons are what hold the parts of the pathogen together. Namely the outer layer of the pathogen.
Only chlorine dioxide ion does the killing, because it is the only thing that can. When in water the chlorine dioxide ion returns to the chlorite condition only part of the chlorine dioxide ions return to this condition and the chlorite cannot kill the pathogens.
What you and your source are looking at is the chemical explanation of what happens and you are grabbing on to points in the reaction that only last 1 millisecond or so and thinking that is where it all ends.

The chlorite cannot kill a pathogen. When the pH is brought down under 9 or so the chlorite deteriorates into chlorine dioxide and that is what kills the pathogens.

Don’t go to google to find your answers. Google answers are mostly college chemistry which isn’t wrong, but you got to know how to apply it to actual commercial operations and your source hasn’t yet understood it. He might be good, but I doubt that he needs to tell me I should get my shit together.

Let me suggest that you both go to Lenntech. That is a company that has been using chlorine dioxide for many years commercially and they have the technology pretty well explained. Once you have learned what chlorine dioxide is and how it works to really do the work then come back and correct me but don’t put a bunch of crap on the internet. Go ahead and say don’t use sodium carbonate. We have not been using it for some time. But don’t tell anyone that chlorine dioxide is chlorine or that chlorine dioxide does not kill pathogens, because of all that chemistry, it is the only thing that does and it is destroyed in the process being changed to chloride. No useable oxygen is ever added to the body.

And then please tell me how adding 18 mg chlorine dioxide along with 10 mg of sodium carbonate can produce many grams of carbon dioxide in the body. Your trusted source isn’t making sense yet.

Lenntech has written it up and explained the chemistry pretty well and so have a number of other commercial companies. They are light years ahead of Google Chemistry Answers and even the Universities.

Please don’t be like all the rest of the critics. Just start talking before you have a clue and please tell your trusted source the same thing. A dose of MMS IS 3 DROPS. That is a total of 18 mg of chlorine dioxide. The amount of sodium carbonate was less than 10 mg for that one dose. Then to say it doesn’t matter how little sodium carbonate is used. That in itself is crazy as amounts do matter.

So anyway if you guys are going to write it up please get it right before just writing and go over all the details before you say that chlorine dioxide never does the job as it is the only thing that does do the job, and in hundreds of places in hundreds of water supplies throughout the world, and if sodium carbonate was the terrible thing that the trusted source says, we have thousands of people using it and no problems reported.

Still we have found that using sodium chlorite to bring the pH back up when needed works best. I have just been working with the worst cancer you ever saw and I used CDI which uses sodium chlorite to bring up the pH. And if your trusted source is going to come up with ideas about using sodium chlorite to bring up the pH he will compete with a couple of universities in Spain who have used it extensively in the past 6 months.

Adam, my suggestion is you read the technology on Lenntech carefully before writing another article and that you either take this last article down or you change it. Don’t just make me wrong. Your are supposed to be a trusted friend. Friends don’t just start writing stuff about friends without at least talking to them first.

Jim Humble

Now, Dr. Neer’s letter:

Adam

hope all is well in your world

we have tested the formulation with baking soda very much so prior to suggesting it to people.

There is no msg or co2 formed when you add baking soda to it. There also is no balanced equation that would show anything otherwise.

Jims mixture has more acid in it then is required to activate the mms. so there is excess acid in it. This is called stoichiometrically imbalanced. as excess acid contributes to diarrhea and throat burn and bad taste we calculated what little bit of bicarb would be needed to get rid of the excess unused acid.

Also the original mixture of mms left of ph of 2.5 to 3 making it hard for people to handle therefore many people stop taking mms. our ph is around 5 and helps be more receptive to the stomach and throat.

our attempts to help people not give up on mms and continue were the basis for the small addition of bicarb.

turns out many hundreds of people have reported back to us with great testimonies and can once again continue to take mms otherwise they would not.
the mixture of mms has chlorous acid, chlorite and chlorine dioxide in it.

the chlorine dioxide test strips are precalibrated to test specifically for that. you eliminate false tests by adding some glycerin per instructions then the reading is solely chlorine dioxide.

this is what turns mixture yellow, what gives it the odor and is a well known action.

the reaction is somewhat confusing but we understand the chemistry along with the help of some of our Ph D friends and other experts working in the chlorine dioxide field. this team of experts has much knowledge to help those whom really want the truth and want to help mankind. One of the original doctors whom helped jim write his book have even tested and approved our bicarb addition.

chlorite appears to be the carrier but it is the chlorine dioxide that is the agent used to kill when needed.
chlorite itself can do pretty good by itself but even the smallest of activation helps it to be even better.

here is other research from other great knowledgeable folks whom have very similar views.
http://www.health-science-spirit.com/MMSaction.htm
you and grant are welcome to contact us anytime and we are happy to help folks better understand the believed truth behind the chemistry of mms. I am also available to go on the radio with you at anytime to help educate people. We want to help people get well.
the bicarb will NOT hurt anyone and frankly is vital so people do not quit as most people simply can not take it the other way. The testimonies speak volumes.
dr ron

Nuff said… for now.

‘Standard of Care’ by Whose Standard?

HEPATITIS CASE-IN-POINT

2 million baby boomers believed to be “infected.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently issued notice that all “baby boomers” – that segment of the population born between 1945 and 1965 – should be tested for Hepatitis C. That would include me. The virus is considered a leading cause of liver cancer, claiming 15,000 lives each year due to related illnesses. The agency suggests that 2 million boomers have the virus and don’t know it. Their recommendation would be for one to come in for testing/screening, and where the virus is found, begin a 48-week round of interferon alpha-2b or Ribavirin treatments.

At $50 to $100 each, the testing process alone could add a $150 million stimulus to the medical industry, but getting 800,000 people on the prescribed Standard of Care, which costs from $50,000 to $150,000, could generate $60 billion in billings (averaged out at $75,000 each), if fully acted upon just once.

Of course, this all amounts to horse hockey, because following the Standard of Care will not restore the natural balance that actually defines, creates, or restores, a state of health. As such, if the Hepatitis condition goes away, you can pretty much count on something else eventually showing up to take its place.

Why? Because health care is a for profit business first. Health is neither its first priority, nor its second, or third. Health isn’t a priority whatsoever, only the appearance of the abatement of disease. I say this because we are succeeding at achieving the appearance of such abatement, at huge profits. We are not succeeding at helping people be well again. How can we when we’re gradually and consistently replacing natural materials for patented, unnatural ones? We can blame the producers for offering it, but what is forcing us to accept it, other than complacency, and a mistaken belief that medical standards and practices the very best possible?

We are paying a very high cost for this insidious wolf of a business model that masquerades in government protected, $cientifically authoritative sheep’s clothing. The only thing that is being “protected” in this situation, is market share of the medical service providers and their suppliers, and liability for the consequences of their recommendations. The public has no protection; they must pay with their money, hopes, dreams, health, and lives.

Oh how I wish this weren’t true, or even an exaggeration. If anything, this description of current medical practice as we know it, is an understatement.

Nobama Care

This story of the Hepatitis C concern comes out at a time when the Obama administration is trying to heighten the appeal of its health care reform law, called Obamacare. This program calls for mandatory enrollment into a health care plan, even suggesting penalties for non-compliance. However, it doesn’t call for mandatory use of methods by healthcare providers, that are known to help restore health. As such, this is a great windfall for the health insurance industry, which still only pays for methods that the policy makers approve. The medical policy makers continue to look askance at anything that isn’t inexpensive, adversarial, destabilizing, or toxifying in its metabolic effect on the body.

In making this story public, the Standard of Care for Hepatitis C is the only option that can be discussed in the mainstream media. As such, the entire population is led to believe that if they have Hepatitis C, irrespective of how they got it, the Medical Autocracy’s solution is the “best” and “most reliable” way to resolve it.

That too is a fiction.

I was editing a conversation with Grant for my radio show when he called today. We’ve now spoken further on this topic, and you need to hear it. For the moment I’m going to give you just a little piece of the longer one. This tidbit is on WF10, clinical trial results that won its developers a patent, and MMS. There is much more to come, but I want you to get acquainted with this caring and very awake being, knowing that such “awakeness” is both our birthright and responsibility. It is also within our power to restore.

HeLa Cells: Great for the Business of Medicine

5 Replies

Not for the Process of Healing

The next installment of insights, this time on the HeLa cell, gleaned through another conversation with Grant, awaits your review via the link at the end of this article. This is only the tip of the tip of the iceberg. All of the apparently disparate subjects that my writings cover are intimately and inextricably connected here. We are a Whole, each unto ourselves, and as a collective. The “bumps” we encounter along the way – and there will be many for those who recognize our slumber and vow to awaken – are to be expected. How we respond to them only indicates the extent and degree of our readiness to know more, and to grow more.

Before being called to my attention by one very insistent Canadian three weeks ago, I knew nothing about the HeLa cell or Henrietta Lacks, the woman whose DNA markers are evident within each one. Before delving deeper into the HeLa cell subject, I’ll express my hopes that a true dialogue develops from the second article and video on vaccines, Shaking Vaccine History at its Foundations. Grant’s grasp of the history, the science, players, and the dynamics, is extensive. What I’ve shared thus far is only a small portion of what we’ve recorded, with more recordings, and a book in the works. If he makes a statement, it will be backed up by references. So I invite all to interact with a desire for clarity. If something he says doesn’t match your present understanding, state your understanding and ask him to clarify or reconcile. You’ll be surprised at the new insights that can be unveiled, on both sides.

Back to the HeLa cells.

For many years, HeLa cells have played a role in my health experience, as they likely have in yours. It is a smoking gun that vaccine pushers, who refuse to see their “medical breakthrough” in any context but that of financial or organizational success, have chosen to be blind to.

This is one reason it is important to recognize that such acts of selective blindness didn’t start with the HeLa. However, it was raised a major notch when the decision was made to infect the world with it.

Yes, I said, infect, for that is what is happening, now more than ever.

While it may seem unlikely that conspiratorial motives have persisted for well over three hundred years, it is far easier to see that profit motives extend back much further in time. War and disease have been, and continue to be, major profit generators for the few who are “properly positioned.” Yet, their gain always appears to be gotten at the expense of many, most of whom even feel a sort of obligation, allegiance, or devotion to the ruler, warlord, or fear monger.

The allegiance is cultivated and elicited, the result of tradition, familiarity, and habit, and not actual biological, medical, or social benefit, or common sense.

Profit-centered thinking can provide a medical and social benefit, but as practiced in our society, it is too often at the expense of the biological, mental, and emotional. The irony in this is that medical profiteers are not exempt from succumbing to the effects and consequences of their profit-based pursuits.

Those who treat others with the serum, eventually “need” the serum, and then die by the serum, leaving the profit model intact.

Historic Obfuscation for Personal Gain

Edward Jenner (1749-1823) is celebrated in medical history for convincing the public that cowpox, a more readily available substance if you’re going to treat the disease for profit, is an acceptable and even preferable substitute for human smallpox. His claims of medical efficacy were never confirmed as fact, even in his day. Consider the following from Jenner and Vaccination: A Strange Chapter in Medical History (1889), by doctor and medical historian, Charles Creighton, M.D.

The paper, On the Origin of the Vaccine Inoculation is dated from Bond Street, the 6th of May, 1801. Jenner was now a great personage, had been presented to the King a year before, and at the time of his writing was in full career as a lion of London society. It would be charitable to assume that vanity had turned his head and made him untruthful; at all events, the piece is a tissue of lies. He professes to give a “concise history” of the origin of vaccine inoculation, the conciseness being enhanced by a charming naiveté and heartiness of manner. The reader is reminded by many simple touches of the long period of anxious thought that this admirable man endured until he came before the world with his beneficent discovery; if dates or other particular circumstances are seldom given, that is merely the writer’s artlessness and modesty.

Jenner’s first difficulty, in approaching the great cowpox-smallpox problem which he afterwards solved to his own and the world’s satisfaction, was one that might well have deterred a better-instructed and more sensible man. He found that some cowpoxed milkers had taken smallpox, just as if their previous cowpoxing were purely irrelevant. In his concise narrative, he would have us believe that he knew that very well, of his own knowledge, and candidly admitted it; it was this that “led me to inquire among the medical practitioners, who all agreed that cowpox was not to be relied upon as a certain preventive of the smallpox.” The real sequence of events was that Jenner, more imaginative than his medical neighbours and colleagues, used to air the popular fancy about cowpox-smallpox at their medico-convivial meetings; whereupon the medical men who had experience to guide them would good-naturedly produce case after case which showed that the popular belief, in so far as it was held even by the vulgar, was a mere verbal illusion; Jenner, however, was so persistent in arguing against the facts that, as he told Baron, the members of the Society threatened to expel him as a bore. That was how Jenner came to know so well that all cowpoxed milkers had not been protected from smallpox.

Jenner’s idea to substitute cow material (“vacca”) for actual human smallpox material wasn’t brilliant if providing the best approach for healing patients was the goal. It was absolutely brilliant if someone was looking to create an ongoing medical model to address smallpox built around a readily available and survivable substitute.

In spite of being unable to receive a patent on the vaccination process, to establish a preferred position for himself in the profit game, the British government awarded Jenner £10,000 in 1802 and another £20,000 in 1807, as recompense for “time away from his general practice”. (Source: Jennermuseum.com)

The “Quest for the Cure” Game

The quest to find “cures” for disease has long-held a subordinate position to the condition that “a killing” be made, financially speaking, once the product receives approval. Hot on the heels of FDA approval of Stribild, its new 4-1 HIV medication, Gilead Sciences expects to replace the $5 billion in sales that will go away as generics take over when patent expirations begin in 2018. The company figures that $28,500 is a fair price to pay for an annual course of this medicine. (Source: FiercePharma) This makes sense if you don’t know that less than $50 worth of certain solutions can help the problem go away, and neither the Medical Authority nor the system, will help you.

However, if you’re looking to restore your health, their methods will hinder you.

Definitions and criteria for approval success with the Medical Authority are set exceedingly low. The approval price paid to said Authority is exceedingly high. Clinical trials and approvals for new drugs by the Medical Authority are based on its effect on symptoms, not on whether it actually abates the pathology. History strongly suggests that if the drug has high or broad healing potential, its chances of being approved are lessened. Examples variously include Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), Dichloroacetic Acid (DCA), Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski’s Anti-neoplaston therapy, and Jim Humble’s MMS.

For reasons that will we will eventually cover, this is a big mistake for health, but perfect for business.

The powers behind the Medical Industry have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams, making “killings” in all meanings of the term. The financial windfalls that they enjoy are attributed to innovation and market guile, while the medical casualties are simply attributed to the relentless advance of disease.

When the business angle is examined, other senseless practices begin to make sense, such as:

atmospheric spraying (chemtrails),
chlorination and fluoridation of water supplies,
herbicide and pesticide spraying of crops,
genetic engineering of the food supply (with labeling deemed unimportant),
institutionalization of processed dairy and harassment of live milk producers,

Citizen subjects are prepared to become good patients early and often. Home, or non-hospital birth is now virtually unheard of. Few parents realize that signing a Certificate of Live Birth starts a registration process that essentially makes their children wards of the state. It’s far better, for tracking purposes, to have all births occur at an accredited Medical Institution so that no one falls through the cracks.

Scientific education includes the suggestion that we evolved from apes, not from divine beings.

Religions tell us that we’re born sinners, and if we’re not “good,” we’re going to hell. We’re led to believe God is too busy playing golf to have time for “wretches” like us.

We’re taught to rely only on five of our senses, thinking anything else is “extra”, and either a “gift” or a “curse,” depending on point of view. “Normal” is thought to be average, vulnerable, and ready to do as we’re told by the Authority.

Heal yourself? Nonsense! Just ask your doctor! He’ll tell you how silly that notion is! Healing is for drugs, not people!

Add a steady rise in mysterious new diseases, from fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue, to morgellons, to the list. New diseases call for new remedies, spawning new rounds of research, clinical accreditation, and approvals. More billion$ into the coffers.

When common sense is invoked, it’s no mystery why the new diseases occur, or what needs to done to resolve them. Yet, how many times do you hear people say, “but they won’t make money if they do that?” Do you really care if they don’t?

Business Tycoon Wants Medicine to Succeed

For all of his wealth, Microsoft founder Bill Gates has directed his humanitarian and philanthropic priorities toward delivering vaccines to the indigent and indigenous people of the world instead of nourishment, in spite of so staggering numbers of people who die each day from starvation. In other words, his foundation is poised to support the delivery of more HeLa cell-laced chemicals to address the great suffering that, in many ways, is the result of current chemical negligence.

Today the delivery of more chemicals means the proliferation of more HeLa cells, because they are used in a wide variety of ways. According to Rebecca Skloot, who authored The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks,writing for oprah.com:

“Research on HeLa was vital to the development of the polio vaccine, as well as drugs for treating herpes, leukemia, influenza, hemophilia, and Parkinson’s disease; it helped uncover the secrets of cancer and the effects of the atom bomb, and led to important advances like cloning, in vitro fertilization, and gene mapping. Since 2001 alone, five Nobel Prizes have been awarded for research involving HeLa cells.

The HeLa story has all the trappings of a great commercial find in the classic “buy low, sell high” tradition. Scientists paid the Lacks family nothing for the cultures they took from their deceased mother. The booty that “$cience” has collected, and continues to collect in the interim can likely be measured in 10’s of billions each year. Additional evidence exists to suggest an alternate theory to explain the HeLa cell’s mysterious emergence, which we’ll discuss at a later time.

At present, it is important to take a critical look at the HeLa cell’s influence on human life, not from its value as a revenue and profit generator, but with respect to its actual effect on health. This is what I have begun doing in my conversations with Grant (“GM”).

Makes you wonder.

Stay tuned…

Vaccinations: Time to Speak the Unspeakable

10 Replies

By the time an individual learns about vaccinations it’s too late. Someone else will have made the decision that we must have one. Most likely a parent or guardian. As such, the deed will have been done years ago, evidenced by a tell-tale mark that was left on one shoulder.

Today it’s possible to have had immunization shots before you were born. Still without your consent.

There are other signs of evidence that one has been vaccinated, and it’s not in the form of good health. It could be autism spectrum disorder and its variations. It could be seizures. It could be sudden infant death. Few are willing to acknowledge that there might be a connection, but many will “defend” the system that doesn’t take careful measures to monitor and question its practices. They tend to be ones who either make their living from these practices, or defend the “$cience” behind them. The quote below by Dr. Mayer Eisenstein isn’t one of them.

“We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we’ve taken care of over the years, and I don’t think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines…….Every doctor now essentially in this country has done something as heinous as the Nazis did, unknowingly.”—-Dr. Mayer Eisenstein

Believe it or not, evidence exists which suggests that the wisdom of vaccine policies and practices may not only be questionable, but may be an unacknowledged contributor to a long list of chronic and degenerative diseases. Critics were not lay people like myself who might be quickly dismissed, but highly respected medical doctors, some of whom were ostracized for speaking out.

Without benefit of informed consent or a second opinion, a vaccinated individual is left only with the option to hope that it did indeed help strengthen the immune system, or at the very least, did no harm. It could take anywhere from a few days to many years before we know for sure.

There is no question but that perfect sanitation has almost obliterated this disease (smallpox), and sooner or later will dispose of it entirely. Of course, when that time comes, in all probability the credit will be given to vaccination. – John Tilden, M.D. (1851-1940)

Oddly, there is no second opinion about vaccinations, no safe haven where nature’s ways are remembered, understood, and respected. We’ve become so convinced in the story that has been passed down through the decades – of virulent and dastardly diseases vanquished with needle and serum – that the only way to combat the growing rash of new pathologies that persist in raining on our health parade, is by pressing the pedal of the vaccination rescue wagon ever harder to the metal.

Perhaps we’re going too fast for our own good.

The practice of administering vaccinations is now unquestioned in medical and science communities. And why wouldn’t it be when authoritative books, such as the 1,725-page Vaccines (Plotkin, Orenstein, Offit 2008), have this to say:

Despite its relative youth, since the time of Edward Jenner, vaccination has controlled the following 12 major diseases, at least in parts of the world: smallpox, diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, measles, mumps, rubella, typhoid and rabies.

In the case of smallpox, the dream of eradication has been fulfilled, because this disease – at least naturally occurring disease – has disappeared from the world. Cases of poliomyelitis have been reduced by 99% thanks to vaccination, and this disease also is targeted by the World Health Organization for eradication.

The impact of vaccination on the health of the world’s peoples is hard to exaggerate. With the exception of safe water, no other modality, not even antibiotics, has had such a major effect on mortality reduction and population growth.

Please pay close attention to the last paragraph, we will revisit it later.

The New York Times Health Guide features an entire section on immunizations (vaccinations), including explicit advice on why they are needed, including the following:

For a few weeks after they are born, babies will have some protection, which was passed from their mother through the placenta before birth. After a short period of time, this natural protection goes away.

“Natural protection goes away?” It’s in the New York Times, so it must be true, right? That’s certainly what a young parent may very well think.

For these and many other reasons, any question as to the efficacy or wisdom of administering vaccines is tantamount to heresy. But that’s not all. Emboldened, and not satisfied by their success in raising vaccinations to unquestionable status, proponents have pushed to make the practice mandatory, even including prenatal cases. In other words, to force them, early and often, on young and old alike.

With the question of efficacy no longer being asked or assessed, the true effects of vaccinating wouldn’t be acknowledged if it hit us upside the head. The “disease” is conveniently available to take the blame instead.

The idea behind vaccinations is to affect an immune response to a particular potential disease by insinuating what is, in essence, a foreign agent carrier. An overload condition of the variola virus, the disease known as smallpox is attributed to several major population reductions that have occurred throughout history.

Why look at vaccinations now?

Increasingly, the evidence is showing that vaccinations are not doing the great good that we’ve accepted to be true, and for those willing to look, history reveals that they never have.

The above graphic, which was posted on the blog Ascension with Mother Earth and Current State of Affairs, speaks for itself. Yet, a commenter who chose to remain “anonymous,” is dismissive, suggesting in one breath that the drug companies are to blame and not the vaccines, and that it is conjecture, not science.

If there is even a shred of truth to the graphic, then this is cause for concern. Both of my children received vaccinations as they were coming up; my son in 1977 and daughter in 1985 as a requirement for enrollment in California public schools. Yet, if vaccinations themselves are not really helpful… to put it another way, if vaccinations are really dangerous to the human, then requiring a parent to submit the child to vaccination is nothing less than extortion, and contributes to a greater conspiracy.

This subject was brought to my attention by the man who, a couple years ago, appeared out of the blue to answer naysayers who have posted their responses to this video excerpt of Dr. John Humiston from my documentary on Jim Humble’s Miracle Mineral Supplement titled, Understanding MMS: Conversations with Jim Humble.

Dr. John Humiston weighed in on MMS in my documentary.

Writing under the screen name of frootloopsian, he has demonstrated a depth of knowledge of the molecular dynamics of MMS that exceeds any that I’ve heard, including Jim Humble. In addition, the focus of his attention is not MMS. He has no bias for, or against it. As such, in explaining how it works and why it is important, he points to other effective products that share the same chemistry.

In our mutual desire to learn, compile and share that knowledge, we have begun a collaboration on a new book that I’ll tell you more about soon. I’ll say this, vaccinations are only part of a larger problem that we should understand, and MMS is one of a number of solutions that should also be understood.

At the most fundamental level, however, we have before us an opportunity and responsibility to discover, and then exercise, that immeasurable element that is within.

Now it’s time to revisit the quote from Vaccines:

The impact of vaccination on the health of the world’s peoples is hard to exaggerate. With the exception of safe water, no other modality, not even antibiotics, has had such a major effect on mortality reduction and population growth.

The evidence that we are uncovering suggests the following: “No other modality has had such a major effect on population reduction and mortality growth.”

Ending the practice of administering vaccines is one thing that the medical industry can do to demonstrate that it truly cares for the health and well-being of humanity. I’m not holding my breath on that. Refusing to permit our children to be given vaccinations is something we can do as well.

There; I’ve said it.

Curing ‘Reactionism’ through Stabilized Imagination

The Power of Power, and the Question

Rise of the Disillusioned

2 Replies

Disillusionment, or to be disillusioned, is generally considered to be a negative state. Indeed, once disillusioned, an individual’s “happiness index” is likely to go down for a time. Seeing the world differently, particularly when the heart is caring, means seeing and caring for the whole. It is the height of illusion to care only for some, such as “us good guys”, and not for others who may be characterized as “them enemies”.

For the newly disillusioned, seeing and respecting another’s perspective doesn’t mean that you’ll agree with them, or like what they’re doing. As such, the disillusioned point of view is not a major smile generator. However, it can be the catalyst for a profound liberation and expansion of consciousness, and the precursor to positive change, also for the whole.

I have been feeling the effects of disillusionment. Look all around, everywhere are lies, deception, distraction, and misdirection.

They only *appear* to be different, but they serve the same master.

The presidential campaign pits two men who are trying their best to present themselves as polar opposites to each other, who actually represent the same thing; the status quo.

While they ply the campaign trail to garner both popular and Electoral College votes, neither Mr. Romney nor Obama work for the American people. Their allegiance, if elected, will be to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Corporation (formed by act of the 41st Congress in 1871) which is headquartered in Washington, DC., but answers to factions and interests beyond. We pledge a similar allegiance, not knowing that this particular corporation is not the one that is reflected in the Constitution for the united states of America. (See the article.)

Campaign promises aren’t meant to be broken, they are destined to be, because peace and prosperity for all aren’t on the agenda. Why should Americans think they deserve peace and prosperity, and not think that other human beings deserve it too? Why do we think freedom of choice is good for us, but not for other human beings? Why do we speak of the fear of what others will do with self-determination when we act on our fears, and threaten to use deadly force to stop them? The controversy around Iran’s pursuit of nuclear technology being but one example. Why do we promote the use of armed military responses in our professed efforts to “maintain peace?”

The answer to these questions is that quelling hostilities between individuals, groups, or nations is not on the political agenda. Since the subject is never brought up, the public doesn’t even think about it, much less vote on whether they want it.

Saber rattling which remains in the political toolbox, has been stepped up a notch by U.S. led, sanctioned, or instigated invasions of countries – where we think we can get away with it – and assassinating self-professed “bad guys,” and then getting on national television to congratulate ourselves about it.

To add injury to insult, the public is then inundated with “documentary” films on various science and environmental media outlets (e.g., Discovery Channel and National Geographic), to let everyone know how the killing mission was carried out, and how right it was “for America”.

Was it really?

Is the world a better, safer place today because we led brigades that slashed and burned Iraq in order to get Saddam Hussein, or into Pakistan to kill real people in an effort to put the idea of Osama bin Laden being still alive, to rest for good?

The presidential campaigners talk about the economy.

Romney, who we’ll call “the hopeful promisor” suggests that he is going to fix it, but how? Rolling up the sleeves and spouting rhetoric, or pointing out the perceived faults of his opponent won’t do it.

The president promisor, Mr. Obama, used the current system, the current way of doing business… printing worthless money, to “bail out” a system that was built by the previous promisor, Mr. Bush, and the one before that, and the one before that.

I could go on, but you get the point.

It doesn’t matter whether they call themselves Democrat or Republican, they work for a Corporation that is SUCCEEDING at its directors’ plan; that is, to GROW THE DEBT, and the public’s national sense of indebtedness. With the exception of Calvin Coolidge and Warren G. Harding, each administration since Woodrow Wilson has overseen growth in the national debt. (See reference.) When presidents have deviated from the dictates of the directors, they have been eliminated. John F. Kennedy planned to end the Federal Reserve System. His life was ended instead.

The promisors will continue growing debt as long as we have a banking system that is not tied to stable, agreed-upon assets, such as gold and other natural resources.

In our economy, money is not an asset, but a debt. A Federal Reserve Note is a promissory note. Its value is what it is simply because we say that’s what it should be thought of as being worth. But what a $10 Federal Reserve Note buys today is a far cry from what it bought forty years ago.

I remember in the early 1970’s, putting $1 in my 1966, metallic green Oldsmobile Toronado to go to work at Delta Airlines in the air freight department at O’Hare Field in Chicago. (It didn’t look nearly as good as the car pictured above.)

That dollar put several gallons of fuel in the tank, which was enough to get me to and from work. Today a dollar’s worth of gas will barely get you out of the gas station. What’s the difference? More money in the system, and much higher debt.

Even with the correction in the real estate market over the past several years, it’s still rare to find, build, or rehab a decent home without the price spiraling well into six figures. This is due in part because a fiat banking system is involved, and each transaction that doesn’t involve the direct exchange of money, either physically or via transfer of accounts, introduces new money, and new debt into the economy.

Unless a person is in a position to pull cash from their own stash tucked away in a safe or under a mattress to buy a home, they’re creating and adding new debt to the economy, and thereby diluting the existing money supply that much more. The bank didn’t have the money either. But it gladly charges you interest on the new money, i.e., “debt” that you’ve created, and it will take control of your home if you default.

Lies, deception, distraction, and misdirection.

Don’t get me started on the medical system. Too late.

“First do no harm…” has long been thought of as the first dictum of the Hippocratic Oath, which could be thought of as the tone setter for the physician’s ethos. Turns out that the phrase “do no harm” is not even part of the Oath. It also turns out that while oath taking is an almost universal ritual as one enters the medical profession, what one is required to say can be at wide variance. Instead of “I will do no harm,” the modern oaths can be loosely translated to, “I will do what I’m told…”.

Experience has shown that when doctors do what they’re told, treat according to guidelines in the Medical Standard of Care, the system does everything it can to (1) reward them with money, professional stature, and accolades, and (2) protect them from the consequences of the medical system’s inherent mal-practices.

For all of the detractors of Jim Humble’s “Miracle Mineral Supplement” (MMS), including the FDA, that claim it is tantamount to giving someone bleach (which isn’t true), treating cancer and other conditions with certified poisons, which are FDA approved, is insane, and under any other circumstance, would be considered criminal. But because all the “authorities” say it’s okay, and the medical schools are told to teach pharmacology, the human toll that counts in millions of deaths and yet rising, is explained away by attributing carcinogenicity to the disease itself. We absolve ourselves the responsibility for examining and changing the many factors, chemical, environmental, and psychological, that contribute to the gradual and chronic increase in imbalance that precipitates cancer and other conditions.

If they use their intelligence, seek, discover, or use methods that actually help their patients restore their health, they face ostracism, professional ridicule, loss of license, legal persecution or prosecution, or worse. The medical system is a friend to those who appear to feed it the most worthless money (i.e., pharmaceutical companies), and a foe to those who actually help the real providers. Who are the real providers? That would be us… the creators.

A holocaust is happening right before our very eyes, and many of us either refuse to see it, or are afraid of admitting it to ourselves. It’s not just the medical system that is killing us by having our heads in the sand.

It’s not just the politicians that are presenting untenable promises. It’s not just the BP’s, McDonalds, KFC’s, Monsanto’s and Halliburton’s of the world. It’s not just the Muslims or the Christians, nor the Vatican or the Bank of England.

This is the world that we have created.

What we haven’t understood is that it belongs to us all, and that we can change it. It doesn’t matter if we remember agreeing to all this. It’s here, now. Lies, deception, distraction, and misdirection are everywhere you look, except one.

What matters is that we discover where the true power rests… and that is within each of us.

Whatever is true within us, will be “true” in the world around us. If you see yourself as a victim, so shall you be. Life will play out as though it is true. If you see yourself as an answer to some of life’s problems instead, that is what you will become.

Disillusionment has its gifts. They come in the form of self-discovery and awareness, and a wonderful sense of satisfaction when you know that you’ve facilitated a positive change, within yourself or another. This is especially so when the change is mutually joyful, where you and the other are both elated over what happened.

Imagine international diplomacy that encompass change via cooperation rather than force, mutual respect rather than saber rattling rhetoric, freedom rather than oppression, openness rather than secrecy. You might say it’s idealistic, but it only requires representatives of one country that is willing to be the example. It would be the first step that changes everything positively.

You don’t have to go to the ends of the earth to “find yourself.” You only need to re-open your mind to that most revered idea of the most wonderful life that you ever imagined living/experiencing, and make that the mission of your heart. Only you know what it is. Yet, if you do it, you will be changing the world. Instead of concerning yourself with the untenable promises of politicians or other “authority” figures, make the ultimate promise to yourself, and be the ultimate authority that you can be.

	cb on MMS: No Need to Circle the…
	Gilgamesh on In His Own Words: The Chlorite…
	grant on In His Own Words: The Chlorite…
	Gilgamesh on In His Own Words: The Chlorite…
	grant on In His Own Words: The Chlorite…
	Albert Krauss on Refreshing Bible Spin, Thresho…
	bornoutsidethebox on A Grand Time for Lovefulness a…
	Gilgamesh on In His Own Words: The Chlorite…
	MyBookie (@MyBookie) on In His Own Words: The Chlorite…
	grant on In His Own Words: The Chlorite…
	MyBookie (@MyBookie) on In His Own Words: The Chlorite…
	grant on Money Obsession and the Appear…

November 2012
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
« Oct
				1	2	3
4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17
18	19	20	21	22	23	24
25	26	27	28	29	30

A Clear difference between ClO2 and ClO2-

Are We Moving Toward a Mythological Reality?

Knowing when to say “NO!”, and what to say it to

Share this:

Like this:

Detoxification of chlorine dioxide (ClO2) by ascorbic acid in aqueous solutions: ESR studies

Abstract

Share this:

Like this:

New Context vs. the FDA Warning on MMS

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

HEPATITIS CASE-IN-POINT

Nobama Care

Share this:

Like this:

Not for the Process of Healing

Historic Obfuscation for Personal Gain

The “Quest for the Cure” Game

Business Tycoon Wants Medicine to Succeed

Share this:

Like this:

Why look at vaccinations now?

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Follow “Thought for Food”

A Clear difference between ClO₂ and ClO₂-

Detoxification of chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) by ascorbic acid in aqueous solutions: ESR studies