Tag Archives: Jim Humble

Bits and Pieces and Alternative Theories

109 Replies

 

A Haitian woman drinks MMS during Port-au-Prince medical mission.

My most recent two radio programs have been on MMS. Last week’s show covered the new protocols, dubbed Protocol 1000 and Protocol 2000, taken right from Jim Humble and the workshop video itself.

This week’s podcast is a monologue where I cover what I am calling “Alternative Theories” on MMS. A few of my interpretations differ from the current thinking about what is behind its effectiveness, which I have begun to outline here. They don’t contradict anything that has been explained. Instead, I believe they clarify. The hour wasn’t enough time to say it all, but it was a good start.

These links are good for about 30 weeks. If I don’t change them before hand, please send me an email reminder if they are broken so that they remain available.

Waking Up to Chlorination

Part of my alternative theory on MMS and chlorine dioxide has to do with the condition that chlorine dioxide leaves water in versus the effects of chlorination.

Elephant in the room.

"You always blow things out of proportion!"

While we have become complacently secure in the “safety” of chlorination and the wisdom of its use as a disinfectant (and oddly, the FDA is not concerned about it being, by their definition, a “bleach”), I believe it is one of the elephants in the room that medical and conventional science has refused to see. Whether it is by design or not is for others to speculate, but it is incumbent on the public to become aware that chlorine IS a danger, while the FDA warns, incorrectly, that when used as recommended, MMS may be one.

Chlorination traumatizes water, leaving it energetically impaired; a hydrological retard. Retarded water is not going to be effective at hydration or waste removal. The indiscriminate attack on everything that is “organic” for the sake of the look of purity, inhibits water’s ability to function optimally. However, it will effectively increase the trihalomethane (THM), which includes the chloroform loads that we carry. The constant exposure to these painless dosings come at a price, which can vary from person to person, thereby providing copious deniability.

A little about chloroform from the National Institutes of Health:

Chloroform may be absorbed into the body through ingestion, inhalation, and through the skin. The largest source of human exposure to THMs in the U.S. is from the consumption of chlorinated drinking water. Besides consuming water, other water uses in the home may contribute significantly to total chloroform exposure both from breathing in chloroform vaporized into the air and from it passing through the skin during bathing. One study observed that a greater percentage of chloroform passed through the skin when bathing water temperatures were increased.

How many people do you think these routines apply to?

Let’s look at some of the effects of chloroform exposure:

Short term:

In addition to central nervous system effects, chloroform anesthesia was associated with cardiac arrhythmias and abnormalities of the liver and kidneys. Inhalation exposure experiments with animals revealed that high levels are toxic to the liver and secondarily to the kidneys. Skin contact with undiluted chloroform may cause a burning sensation, redness, and blistering.

Long-term:

Chronic oral exposure of humans to chloroform at high doses results in adverse effects on the central nervous system, liver, kidneys and heart.

Carcinogenic effects:

In studies of human populations using chlorinated drinking water in which chloroform is the predominant THM, small increases in the incidence of rectal, colon and bladder cancer have been consistently observed, with evidence strongest for bladder cancer.

As if that weren’t enough, fertility and reproductive health is affected:

Reports in the scientific literature in which chloroform was administered to animals indicate that chloroform has the potential to cause birth defects, miscarriages, and delays in fetal development. Results have generally been inconclusive regarding exposure to THMs and adverse developmental or reproductive effects in humans. However, the results of a recent study suggest an increased risk of early-term miscarriage from high levels of THMs in tap water, particularly BDCM.

With all this evidence, plausible deniability still reigns, enough that the practice isn’t banned, even though a significant portion of the population is experiencing the very pathologies outlined above.

Of course, there is a lot of “junk” in water these days. The predominant water treatment methods are ineffective at the most fundamental level; i.e., the level of vibration and information.

Chlorination is the foundation of a long list of chemical pollutants that masquerade as treatment aids.

Another is fluoridation.

A friend sent me a link to a movie that is online, about how fluoridation became an accepted part of water treatment.

Along with the link to the film was the following quote:

The history of medicine and government in the United States is littered with corruption, crime, and fraud.

Make no mistake. All of us have been placed in position to believe lies that would ordinarily be rejected by those less educated that we. But for some reason, we go on believing these lies as if to do otherwise would place us in jeopardy of ridicule.

This link delivers unbelievable proof of what I have been saying for the last 5 years..FLUORIDATION IS DEADLY.

These chemicals are deadly only if we don’t take measures to nullify them. I believe that MMS (chlorine dioxide) is one such way.

I’m sure the story of how chlorine continues to be chosen over chlorine dioxide is just as compelling.

Is Informing the Public Jim Humble’s ‘Sin?’

85 Replies
Jim Humble

Introduced sodium chlorite for personal use as "MMS".

The term “MMS” has taken on a life of its own, thanks to Jim Humble, a once itinerant contract gold prospector. On an expedition in the middle of nowhere he recognized that he had stumbled upon something of great importance when he helped two men, stricken with malaria, avert possible death after taking a hastily prepared concoction of “stabilized oxygen.”

Now, over 10 years later, after extensive solitary research, grass roots testing that started in Africa, three years after writing and self-publishing his book and countless private trials in the far flung corners of the world, the product that emerged from that fateful day has turned health prospects around for 100’s of thousands of people and animals.

However, instead of celebration or benign investigation, a spate of warnings were issued by the FDA. Public health agencies around the world were now on record that MMS had garnered their attention, and presently, it appears that they don’t want you to know any more about it.

I personally think that’s not going to happen. MMS use will grow, as more people learn how it works.

In the meantime, if you listen to the agencies’ warnings, you’d think that MMS and the chlorine dioxide that is generated from it (with the aid of an activator), was the most dangerous substance imaginable, that would cause your throat to melt as it went down or your hair to fall out. But wait, there is a long list of drugs that already make this happen, and they have earned – or shall I say that their companies have paid for — the FDA Seal of Approval!

The FDA doesn’t differentiate between natural which I refer to as “public domain” chemicals, and synthetic, or patented pharmaceuticals. They get a good penny for granting approvals that allow these companies — the most profitable on the planet — to issue poisons to the public. They hold purveyors of unpatentable products up to the same economic barrier, and standard of proof. But why does “proof” have to be demonstrated for something we can understand in a high school chemistry class?

Perhaps they can’t fathom the idea of the public knowing that the “bugs” we spend billions of dollars for, and lose lives over, each year could be controlled with the help of a few drops of water disinfectant that carries oxygen?

On the other hand, why does paying a fee that can be millions of dollars justify approving drugs that clearly are dangerous, but the agency and the medical industry embrace as staple tools? The anticoagulant Coumadin (also marketed as Warfarin) is one example. According to Wikipedia, the product was originally marketed as a pesticide for rats and mice, and is still popular for that use. I’ve made these observations before, and will likely make them again. How can introducing a chemical designed to kill life help life get healthier?

Now I realize that there is a logic associated with Coumadin use (as well as chemotherapy, etc.) that existed before the product became a popular medicine, but shouldn’t an “efficacy check” be ongoing? If you look at the effects that coumadin has on overall chemical and microbial balance in the body, I’m willing to bet that it is not improved. All that synthetic, unmetabolized stuff has to be stored somewhere, and the body attempts to maintain functionality as long as possible, and then existence as long as possible. That is life’s purpose.

I find it ironic that researchers often test products on mice and rats, determining their safety by how quickly they kill. Here’s a product (Coumadin, etc.) that was designed to kill rats and mice, and yet it is approved for “therapeutic” use in humans! Do they really believe that this is the best our “research” can come up with?

I have speculated, and continue to, that the problem may not be in the microbial population, but in the deluge of inorganic material we expose ourselves to — voluntarily and involuntarily — each day. I believe that microbial forces of certain types (i.e., aerobic and anaerobic) proliferate under certain environmental conditions; conditions that change according to the presence of (1) adequate hydration, (2) a full-spectrum mineral presence, and (3) proper movement and elimination of waste matter. Predominant methods of water and food processing severely compromises the first two factors, which by combined effect, then compromises the third.

The various agencies are too busy protecting and defending the system to actually assess what effects it is having on the public, and more importantly, whether better approaches are available. MMS is showing results that the agencies want their expensive, limited access, approved chemicals to demonstrate, but aren’t. So instead of taking a genuine look at it, they use the last bit of confidence that the public might have had in them, and tell them straight up, “This stuff is bad, don’t go near it!”

So the public grapples with conflicting information. Who are they to believe? Since this is easily verifiable science, don’t you think the FDA would have checked their data before making their claims? I would certainly think so, at least, that is what I would expect of any science-based organization. But science is only as effective as the scope of its study and inquiry, and its commitment to truth. Schooled at the University of Pharmacology (with campuses all over the world), FDA scientists and other researchers see nature as an alien landscape with which they are unfamiliar and have little interest, except if they can patent a trait that they have observed, thereby limiting benefits that were intended for all to an elite few. Unable to do that with MMS, their information is therefore misleading; a blend of truth, half-truth, and outright falsehood.

Who, on the other hand, would listen to a geezer named Humble? Detractors criticize his writing style, others criticize his grasp of chemistry. They call him a charlatan and ridicule his efforts to build an aura of protection around himself through a church.

Continues researching ways to increase effectiveness.

Continues to research ways to increase effectiveness.

Yet, his information about chlorine dioxide has been confirmed time and time again by the effects. Even if clinical trials have not been done in a manner that would satisfy “critics”… (a “satisfied critic” is an oxymoron if I ever heard one), there is enough information available on the nature of the chlorine dioxide molecule to postulate its potential as a superior substitute for a myriad of currently used pharmaceuticals.

In spite of the much higher price that could have been charged for a product that actually works and reduces one’s toxic, fungal, and microbial load, as a condition of sharing his information with sellers, Humble made them promise to keep the retail price low, so as to make it available to anyone who needed it. He even gave instructions on how to make it on one’s own.

An evolution ensued, and new people are now questioning and denouncing the use of this “industrial bleach” only to eventually see it for what it is, and can become.

More Scientific Support For Chlorine Dioxide Use

Today someone sent me yet another piece of scientific evidence of the efficacy of chlorine dioxide. This one, created in 2001 is titled, “Sodium Chlorate, A Potential Treatment of Salmonella in Pigs,” was produced by the Canadian Ministry of Agriculture Food & Rural Affairs.

It points out that there are 1.4 million cases of human Salmonellosis and 600 deaths annually in the United States. Bacteria can be passed during meat processing due to fecal spillage from evisceration. Therefore, reducing the amount of Salmonella in the gut and feces is considered a good thing.

They elected to follow a strategy set forth in a laboratory study conducted by USDA scientists in 2001 and outlined, according to the abstract, in the Journal of Food Protection.

It turns out that E. coli and Salmonella contain an enzyme, known as respiratory nitrate reductase, which converts the chlorate into chlorite (ClO2), which, in turn, kills both pathogens. In other words, the pathogens have enzymes within them that, upon contact with the chlorine dioxide molecule, initiates the oxidative event that eliminates the pathogen.

Aerobic bacteria, on the other hand, do not have the respiratory nitrate reductase enzyme, and are not affected by chlorine dioxide. (Sounds pretty much like what Jim Humble has said all along.)

The researchers observed a 150-fold reduction in intestinal Salmonella after administering the chlorate tablets.

They conclude:

The research is still in the early stage and this new approach needs to be approved by the FDA before it can be widely used by the U.S. livestock industry. Possible applications include feeding chlorate to animals before they are transported to slaughter or adding it to drinking water before loading or at lairage.

It’s likely that said approval has not been granted, even though it is for pigs. I’m happy to be wrong, and issue an apology. But if these scientists observed such profoundly beneficial changes, and pig physiology works very much like humans, then this is more third-party evidence that the FDA, all its cronies, and the new-found legion of critics, are wrong about chlorine dioxide.

It’s now almost 10 years since this research was done, before Jim Humble was a gleam in the FDA’s eye, or committed the “sin” of informing the public that chlorine dioxide might be helpful. Once we hit a critical mass of irrefutable evidence, they’ll act as though they knew it was a good thing all along.

—————-

MMS Workshop DVD Set Cover Art

MMS Workshop 8-DVD Set

MMS Workshop Video Update

After a first production run that produced more errors than base hits (a little World Series humor), Jim Humble’s 5-day MMS Workshop presentation re-emerges as an 8-disc set.

New shipments will start the week of November 8. Orders are being accepted.

Listen

You can listen to Jim Humble explaining the two fundamental Protocol strategies by following the link below:

Wolf to Henhouse: “Just Say ‘No’ to MMS!”

147 Replies
FDA Warnings

Who is there to warn the public against these?

 

The interest in, and use of “MMS,” which Jim Humble has recently dubbed, Master Mineral Supplement, continues, as the United Kingdom has publicly denounced the use of this product. Even the often reliable Wikipedia, which usually presents the appearance of unbiased information, now presents an entry on MMS that is a boldface lie.

A story in the BBC recently reported that the Food Standards Agency (FSA) praised a 15 year-old with Crohn’s disease for alerting it to MMS. Now chlorine dioxide, which is generated by using MMS (along with a citric acid “activator”), could in fact, help someone with Crohn’s disease.

“Why?”, you might ask.

It’s pretty simple. Anyone who has Crohn’s symptoms is going to have an inner system that is out of balance. I believe we can agree on this.

Balance is synonymous with health. When an individual not healthy, they will not be in balance. Yet, if balance is restored, health returns.

Most current medical treatment methods don’t restore balance. Not only that, most current living methods compromise balance on many levels. One of the most fundamental places where imbalance, and hence, disease is started, is in our water.

Chemicals are foundation of modern water treatment.

Current methods of water treatment are most effective in giving us water that looks good, but are ineffective in providing water that is actually healthy. In fact, water that comes to the tap, as well as many bottled waters are touted to be safe, are actually highly chemicalized, with chlorine (a bleach), fluoride, ammonia, and many other inorganic materials. And yet, in light of the urgent warnings against using MMS, the cumulative effects of this ongoing, daily intake of inorganic information is given no consideration anywhere in the current medical treatment matrix. According to the authorities, the bleach called MMS shouldn’t be used, but the bleach that is being used, without any input or consent by the public, is okay.

And if you don’t already know it, chlorine and chlorine dioxide demonstrate very different chemical behavior.

Humans are ingesting a multitude of inorganic and synthetic chemicals daily in going about the business of living life. A significant portion of this is through ingesting chlorinated water, about which no warnings or calls for reductions are being made.

When it combines with other materials, chlorine spins off another group of chemicals called, trihalomethanes (THMs). They are made up of chloroform, bromodichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, and bromoform. All of these are known carcinogens, which mean they can increase the likelihood of cancer. Imagine that this IS going on today, every day, each year, and for decades.

Look at some of the many pathologies linked to iodine deficiency, which is estimated to affect 2 billion people. Iodine is a natural antibacterial, and needed to produce the thyroid hormone. Potential problems include hypothyroidism, goiter, mental retardation and birth defects, and breast cancer.

Iodine is a member of a group of elements on the Periodic Table called halogens, as are chlorine and fluoride. However, it is the only essential trace element among them. In other words, iodine is essential for health. The other halogens are, in fact, harmful. Could it be that getting so much incidental chlorine and fluoride through water intake leaves less room for iodine, which we admittedly get too little of?

Yet, there are no warnings or suggestions forthcoming from the watchdog agencies of this dire situation or that we should adopt other methods.

Are you hearing me on this? Chlorination produces byproducts that are known carcinogens. Yet, it continues to be the “disinfectant of choice” among water treatment agencies around the world. According to americanchemistry.com, the chlorine industry “contributes” $46 billion to the North American economy annually. Included in their list their contributions:

  • Clean drinking water
  • 93 percent of all life-saving pharmaceuticals
  • 86 percent of crop protection compounds

“Clean” drinking water is not necessarily safe drinking water. Safe drinking water will actually hydrate you and reduce toxicity. Clean water, as it is presently treated, can actually increase the body’s toxic load.

While it may not kill you on ingestion, ingesting chemically treated, i.e., chlorinated water will slowly and steadily deteriorate health. One exception, based on its known chemical behavior, is chlorine dioxide, which actually decreases the toxic presence in the environment when taken in appropriate amounts.

Drinking is only one of the ways that we ingest water, and not even the major way. The main way that we intake water is through showering and bathing. It is absorbed directly through the skin. When water is chlorinated, we turn our showers into gas chambers, open our pores, and step in.

That is, unless we take conscious, and heretofore unconventional measures to counteract the effects of our “advanced” ways. Based on the results that people have reported after using MMS, it appears to be doing something beneficial. And yet, none of the “protective agencies” around the world have seen fit to investigate for right doing, so convinced they appear to be that something “wrong” is being done.

Chlorine isn’t the only chemical culprit that we have developed a blind eye and deaf ear to. Fluoride is right up there, having gained a privileged general perception as beneficial; so good in fact, that it is put in water, toothpaste, and supplement tablets, including some vitamins.

Is this an accurate representation of fluoride's effects?

Fluoride is a neurotoxin. Taking it on a regular basis can compromise health. Long-standing evidence bears the statement out. A 1992 report published by the New Jersey Department of Health found that bone cancer in male children was two to seven times greater in areas where water was fluoridated. Another study linked fluoridation of water to uterine cancer deaths.

There is no scientific or experiential evidence to support the FDA and FSA’s claims against MMS. It’s chemical behavior suggests that, if scaled down to sufficiently enough, it should reduce toxicity, and if that is done, health should improve. That is what has happened, and perhaps why the world is not being warned against using MMS.

We could go on for days listing the chemicals that, on a daily basis, are routinely ingested, either through water, in gaseous form, in our foods and beverages, or via airborne inhalation, which ultimately cause cellular stress and eventually metabolic dysfunction within the body. Not only are no actions being taken toward warning the public, reducing and replacing these methods, the remedies that we are offered to counteract the effects of these products — and are incessantly admonished to “ask our doctors” about — are also more chemicals.

Health care costs are rising, yet disease onset is coming earlier in life, and staying longer. Yet, MMS has been deemed by these and other “experts,” a dangerous bleach.

I’m inclined to believe that the 15-year-old with Crohn’s disease who, if we are to believe the story, notified the authorities about MMS, is most likely not aware of these nuances of its chemistry. The greater darkness, however, is awareness of his own chemistry which, even after several decades or even a lifetime, is a darkness shared by the general public.

The FSA and FDA should know better. They should be letting the youngster, and the public know about MMS, in the context of how it can actually help his young body reduce its toxic load. But then, that would mean dumping all the chemical stuff they have been supporting, and having to admit that they have been wolves guarding the henhouse and all its chicks.

Original MMS Essay - ‘No Miracle’ - Updated

13 Replies

I am sometimes remiss to report on my own activities, but it is worthwhile to note that I have updated my original article on MMS, titled, “No Miracle, Just Wonderful Chemistry.” It now contains updated information on the protocols, including Protocol 1000 (for general use) and Protocol 2000 (for acute cases), as well as a couple new photos to show some of the differences between the original 10% citric acid activator and the now preferred 50% solution.

I preserved much of the original text, which did not become “wrong,” but has been supplanted by several easier to palette approaches. I intend to do the same thing with my documentary, Understanding MMS: Conversations with Jim Humble. While it remains viable, providing useful and correct information, it might be best called an archival piece, showing things as they were started — at least with my involvement — three years ago.

Many of the people that I have interviewed recently, who overcame nasty health challenges like breast cancer and staph infections, did so using the “old school” MMS protocols outlined in the original ‘No Miracle’ article and the documentary; 15 drops (and 75 drops of 10% citric acid or lemon/lime juice), up to three times a day. The maximum of 3 drops per hour for 8 hours called for by Protocol 1000 is, figuratively speaking, easier to swallow. On the other hand, Jim has come up with many other novel ways to generate and deliver MMS inside the body besides oral intake. Most of them are listed in the updated article.

I have also completed editing, condensing, and authoring Jim Humble’s 5-day MMS workshop into a 4 disc DVD product. I originally thought it would be a 5-dvd set, but was able to get the last two day’s sessions on one disc.

Artwork for the MMS Workshop DVD Set

Jim’s workshop is far more comprehensive than there is time, or most people even have the attention span to watch in a video presentation. However, when a life depends on understanding, the information contained in this set is invaluable.

The topics that he covers are broad, in part because we have been conditioned to believe that diseases are unrelated. This allows doctors to “parallel prescribe ,” authorizing the introduction of multiple sets of complex chemicals into the inner ecology of the body, like the Corexit sorties that BP was permitted to dump in the Gulf of Mexico; almost 2 million gallons worth.

In the same way that the prescription chemicals — which suck and bind up precious oxygen in an already oxygen deficient environment — are a traumatic shock to the human body, so it was and is in the Gulf. Under any other circumstances, the planes that dropped the Corexit would have been intercepted and ordered to stop, or face being shot out of the air. This was a blatant act of terror, except that it was about oil, and human and ecological health took a back seat to making a buck.

The same mentality is at work when prescription drugs are issued, or when chemicals and synthetic (e.g., GMO) materials are considered acceptable substitutes for real food and mineral supplements. Even while estuaries continue to die and fish suffocate from the toxic soup, the FDA has given the green light for Americans to consume oysters and seafood from the Gulf (if they can find any that are living or that haven’t mutated), and are giving the go ahead to transgenic (genetically modified) salmon, but are warning the public that MMS is a dangerous “bleach.”

Do you wonder why they have lost any credibility they might have had?

The workshop DVD will be shipping to people who have pre-ordered soon, as they are preparing to leave the manufacturing plant to their fulfillment point as I write this. So the wait is almost over. It should show up on their web site sometime soon. Here is the trailer I produced… (when it was apparent that 5 discs would be necessary).

Lastly, I have written and published quite a few essays on MMS over the past couple years. I printed out the original the other day for a woman whose husband has been sent home to die from cancer, and someone told her about MMS and insisted that she contact me. She knew nothing about it, and had no computer for internet access. I gave her a thumbnail overview of what it does and how it is used, then updated the article (which I had promised myself to do anyway), and sent her a copy of the documentary DVD.

I also sent a request to PGL International, and asked them to ship some MMS to this lady. On the next business day, it was on its way by Express Mail. She now has product and the information I sent. Hopefully, she has a clue as to how and where to begin. The subject of money never came up.

Life is more important than money. Health is more important than wealth.

If you would like me to publish a booklet, or a book of my selected articles on MMS, please let me know. I considered doing this some time ago, but never did.

Let’s Play ‘Pin the Death on MMS!’

21 Replies

wheres_the_truth

Sylvia Fink died on a yacht near the island of Vanuatu in the South Pacific in August 2009. As a passing, hers is noteworthy because, from eyewitness accounts, death came unexpectedly, after she took the Miracle Mineral Supplement, widely known as “MMS.”

Death by medication isn’t unusual. In fact, death by medication has gained such social acceptance that its significance only seems to matter to the people whose lives were directly touched by the passing. You don’t hear about the people who die each day from standard medication unless they’re well known. However, estimates range from 200,000 to well over 700,000 people die each year from standard medical treatment in the United States alone. Yet, this fact does not call into question whether the treatments themselves are actually useful or effective. The only thing anyone seems to care about, is whether they have been approved by the FDA.

With FDA approval, 700,000 deaths due to prescribed medication is considered acceptable. Without approval, one death is not. On the contrary, it is considered valid reason to issue a public warning against MMS use – without an impartial investigation or verification of the claim. It appears to be reason enough for the FDA to go on a campaign to dissuade the public from using MMS as an internal disinfectant.

Let us clearly state that the FDA did not cite Sylvia Fink’s death in its warning, nor did they infer that death was a possible result of using MMS as outlined. However, they do infer that the myriad ailments that people who have used the product have reported relief from, such as diabetes, herpes, hepatitis, many forms of cancer, and HIV/AIDS are unrelated. Doug Nash, Silvia Fink’s husband, who claims that consuming MMS killed his wife, portrayed her as the picture of health who died on a two-drop dose.

Someone is either misinformed, misinforming, lying, or all of the above.

Over one year after Mrs. Fink’s death, a toxicology report has not been made public. Yet, articles have been published in the January 9, 2010 edition of the Sydney Morning Herald, implying that MMS may have caused her death, and is dangerous. Several other articles that are supportive of Doug Nash’s conclusion, or critical of MMS have been also published. (The Age, Vanuatu Daily Post, Gabriel Segura, MD)

Playing the role of the grieving husband, Doug Nash made it his mission in life to “pin” his wife’s death on MMS, having pleaded his case in various forum communities where MMS information is exchanged as curezone.com, and Health Salon, among others. (He has steered clear of this one.)

In addition, he has been in the unusual position of interpreting toxicology, and even offering suggestions on how the coroner should present his results. So intent is he on “proving” that MMS did his wife in, I don’t believe Mr. Nash considers how his zealousness naturally draws attention to him.

I don’t know if the FDA’s campaign was instigated by Mr. Nash, but a copy of a complaint issued by Nash to the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the FDA, reads in part, “From this experience I conclude that MMS is a dangerous and potentially lethal substance if ingested as a medical remedy.”

If this was true, toxicology reports should have confirmed it and be public record by now. They have not.

In his complaint, Mr. Nash claims that Sylvia took two drops of MMS, as a prophylactic remedy against malaria. At that time, she would also have used ten drops of lime juice as a catalyst to generate chlorine dioxide, which is the real disinfecting agent of the protocol.

I cannot speak to whether MMS was promoted by the people in that South Pacific yachting community as a prophylactic for malaria, but given its demonstrated effectiveness in cases where malaria has been contracted, no protocols had been issued for its use before the fact. In attending two of Jim Humble’s MMS workshops in the Dominican Republic in 2010, the subject of the prophylactic use of MMS for any condition has never been brought up, much less promoted.

While it was a question a year ago, as people around the world were gaining experience with MMS, it is understood today that two drops of MMS wouldn’t harm a sick mouse, much less the healthy 56-year young picture of a woman that Doug Nash painted his wife to be. It is more likely that such a dose would help a diseased state, and have no impact on a healthy person (or mouse).

Eyewitness accounts of Sylvie’s last hours written by the people who supplied the MMS, observed her the night before the incident before taking MMS (exhibiting labored speech and breathing), and valiantly offered their assistance in resuscitation, paint a very different picture. Mr. Nash showed telltale signs of another agenda – of a man who cared more, even then, about making a case, than helping his wife.

The FDA’s claim that the wide spectrum of conditions abated that have been attributed to MMS are unrelated, is another place where misinformation, misunderstanding, or lies are being perpetrated. However, the problem here is much larger than Sylvia Fink. It goes to the thinking that causes doctors and medical institutions to routinely engage in simultaneous medication, which could also be termed, parallel poisoning. It is the practice of prescribing multiple (expensive) products to treat various symptoms that are thought, by said medical “book” of standard, accepted procedures, protocols, and practices, to be “unrelated.”

When the public gets wind of the fact that the human being is a single, whole system and capable of systemic correction when a problem is mitigated – in other words, many symptoms can be resolved with a few effective corrections – it’s going to be a very abrupt wake up call.

MMS addresses the condition and state of the water that courses through the system, dealing not only with bacterial, viral, and fungal factors, but inorganic chemicals and heavy metals that have been absorbed, are unmetabolizable, and have been stored in tissue.

In a recent conversation I had with C.W. Reed on Talk For Food, a woman from Florida who got over breast cancer with the help of MMS, she noted the alarmingly high levels of heavy metal toxicity that showed up in a hair analysis test run in January 2009. In May 2010, a follow-up hair analysis indicated that heavy metal levels were now negligible. In spite of 23 pages of data explaining how sick she was, she worked herself up to the original, 15-drop, 3-times daily limit, taken orally, as the FDA is now warning against doing.

When you know for yourself, or have met people who have had such transformational experiences using MMS under their belt, the dubious nature of Mr. Nash’s and the FDA’s campaign is magnified.

While Doug Nash and the FDA are birds of a feather, neither case will stand if it is not based in truth. I can’t imagine his wife wanting her passing to be attributed to, or based on, a false claim.

Money and force will not derail genuine truth. If MMS is harmful, it will become as self-evident as the harm being done by Standard Medical Practices each and every day.

Another year has passed since this MMS controversy began, and this one death remains the worse anyone can come up with to pin on Jim Humble’s simple, inexpensive, and effective chemistry protocol, while another 700,000 or so have died, and tens of millions have had surgeries and other medical procedures that might have been unnecessary, or gone smoother if this simple disinfectant and chemical neutralizer had been used.

In this video, I show you what two drops of MMS looks like, and introduce you to Joe Grenon, who got rid of a staph infection using MMS

The alarm is about to go off.

A ‘Visual’ and Vocal Jim Humble on MMS

2 Replies
Jim Humble in the Van Gogh Cafe

Jim Humble in the Van Gogh Cafe, Amsterdam

I took the picture of Jim Humble in May, at the Van Gogh Cafe in Amsterdam. We were trying to find a place to eat, and to do a short interview during a break from the Nexxus Conference, where Jim was a speaker. It was a very short stay in Amsterdam, a beautiful city. The next day — Sunday — we were in southern Germany where Jim gave another talk on MMS.

I left them in Germany and headed for London, where I spent six days and conducted some interviews on another aspect of MMS that I’ll talk about later. That weekend, Jim spoke in Prague, staying in Germany much of that time. BTW, you should see this new European MMS site.

The New Light: A site about Jim Humble and MMS

The New Light

The site was created by Leo Koehof, a writer, photographer and videographer, who has traveled through Africa, witnessing and documenting his work there. I met Leo on my first trip to the Dominnican Republic earlier this year, and had the pleasure of journeying with him and three other classmates, on that memorable trip to Haiti.

The video below is excerpted from my interview with Jim a couple of weeks ago on my second visit to the D.R.

You can listen to the entire podcast by visiting the link below, on webtalkradio.net

Click here.

Saying ‘No’ to War on MMS or FDA

8 Replies
Jim Humble speaks at 2010 Nexxus Conference in Amsterdam

Jim Humble speaks at 2010 Nexxus Conference in Amsterdam

It is common practice to refer to the unfolding situation with the FDA and the Miracle Mineral Supplement (“MMS”) as a battle; a war that must be fought, and “won.” To MMS proponents, it is a “right” that must carried forward to overcome a “wrong.” Of course, the FDA is thinking the same way, albeit with the roles reversed and they are the “good guys” and Jim Humble and the MMS distributors the “bad guys.”

Oh yeah… the public are “victims,” a perception that may be shared by both. The FDA may not really care, since it protects the interests of corporate pharmaceutical entities, and is indifferent to criminalizing, prosecuting, or threatening anyone who appears to stand in its way. Jim Humble does indeed care for “the little guy.” I believe that both tend to underestimate the power that each citizen wields.

The goal of both the FDA and MMS proponents is for the other to “lose”. Both believe that their “victory” and the others’ “loss” is a “win” for their side. Such is the nature of oppositional thinking that has brought us countless wars – between nations, states, social causes (e.g., President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty (1964), Richard Nixon’s War on Cancer (1971), and the Bush/Obama War on Terror) and losses of life. What these efforts get us is more of everything that is opposed.

For the record, I am considered by some to be an MMS “proponent.” I don’t sell it, nor do I take it religiously. However, I can personally attest to MMS’ efficacy for me. From personal observation, study, and experience, I know that a light dosing of chlorine dioxide, via an MMS protocol (and there are several intake methods), will do more to help my health than the chlorine and fluoride added to the water supply.

Chlorine dioxide is effective against a wide range of pathogens that live in water, as well as the biofilm that they colonize (for protective purposes) in. The FDA’s saying that chlorine dioxide use is dangerous, as indicated via the MMS protocol, is tantamount to absurdity, given what they have sanctioned for human consumption and medical use.

Even if the FDA had acknowledged the merits of chlorine dioxide, but said that they had reservations and would like to see – and fund – research into its best use, the Agency might have had some credibility. Their total disinterest in looking at the merits of chlorine dioxide, in the face of hundreds of thousands of deaths each year from cancer and its treatment, diabetes, heart disease and many others, plus others from infectious diseases that drugs have shown themselves to be ineffective against, reveals a level of indifference to human welfare by the Agency that I find unacceptable.

Based on observed actions, their bias is toward corporate welfare, which makes its living from the perpetuation and management of disease. When you’re trying to perpetuate disease but not restore health, it means that people are needlessly killed off. Beyond one’s ability to pay the bill, life is no longer sacred.

In television ads for pharmaceutical drugs, have you heard something like, “if you can’t afford your medication, maybe A-Z can help.”

Sounds really caring doesn’t it?

A-Z will help get you addicted to its expensive, ineffective drug. Then you’re indebted to them twice-fold. If someone doesn’t keep up the payments, you can bet the drug will stop. The only problem is that we continue being led to believe that the drug may have helped.

Must Therapeutic Effectiveness be Expensive?

There are some who dismiss MMS because it’s so inexpensive. They think it can’t be viable if millions of dollars of research and countless double-blind studies and clinical trials haven’t been funded. What they don’t consider is that such Draconian measures aren’t necessary. If people get well, if the problem that is being combated goes away, then you’ve got a winner. We’ve grown accustomed to accepting a standard of activity that doesn’t even include restoration of health and well-being as its mandate.

From what I have seen, experienced, and have learned from others who have used MMS, it is clearly a superior tool than many that our medical system is relying on. People are dying each day from standard medical prescriptions and practices that actually make the patient’s problems worse, not better.

Consider how cancers tend to spread right after biopsies have been performed. A condition that was being contained by the body is immediately placed into the bloodstream where it quickly spreads. Consider how chemotherapy and radiation increase cellular stress on the entire body, adversely affecting healthy tissue in the process. Maybe this is why so many people believe that chlorine dioxide can’t be “selective” in its reactivity. It may not be checking the ID cards of pathogens, but anyone that has a natural electrical “signature” that is lower than the chlorine dioxide molecule (0.96 volts), will be toast.

The body doesn’t heal under stress. It heals as stress is relieved, and the stressors are removed. By there very nature, drugs increase cellular stress. MMS/chlorine dioxide appears to relieve stress.

Waging war on MMS, or on the FDA, will not change these facts. Doing so would mean that the FDA continues doing what it does, the way that it does it, and MMS will in fact, be around, and used in the way that Jim Humble has outlined. Both will “win,” and both will “lose.” In that respect, society will remain in the status quo, continuing tiptoe around the truth. Continuing to quietly help each other. Continuing to meekly present one’s self to the chemotherapy and cancer mill when doctor’s “data” has determined that you have cancer.

Some will say no to medical orthodoxy, but it will not be with the open and intelligent support of their doctors, because the practitioners, their teachers, medical schools, professional association (AMA), government agency (FDA), health insurance companies, charitable organizations and research facilities, will all remain slaves to a pharmaceutical god thought supreme. This is the change that needs to happen.

It’s time for medicine to acknowledge that Nature has an answer to every ailment known, and unknown to man. It’s the height of delusion to believe that we can do a better job at assisting life by using synthetic methods, or bring health by creating greater imbalance.

Embracing Mother Nature

Our belief in the primacy of technology and power of money have blinded us to the sublime and simple power of energy of Nature that denies itself to no one, yet is unavailable to anyone who denies himself.

Each human being is the keyholder, the solution to whatever problem one has. That is, unless one is in a state of waiting for someone else “better” to solve it. The better could be seen in terms of education, money, credentials, looks. Imagine how many people have called their doctor because they saw a commercial featuring a good looking paid actor or actress suggesting “that ____________ might be right for you,” even with its laundry list of side-effects that can include suicidal thoughts and death.

Such is the world we have created when we deny who we are, believe we are powerless, and need someone else to “save” us.

The MMS/FDA situation doesn’t have to be a war. Since the dynamics that brought MMS into being have established its right to be here, the FDA can fiddle with it, or mess with people as long as they want. They can try to defame the idea of chlorine dioxide use. It’s not going to work. This is not simply because of Jim Humble, but because the fundamental impulse and intent of LIFE is to LIVE. Chemicalization, as predominantly practiced by medicine and society today (e.g., food production, water treatment, environmental pollution), is antagonistic to life.

Department of Dubious Truth

While watching the NFL preseason game between the New Orleans Saints and San Diego Chargers last night, it was interesting to see the PR campaign in full force to get people to come to the Gulf, as the announcers went on and on about the oysters that they ate, and that oil is not a problem.

It is a statement that I dare say doesn’t ring true to most people. Just because you can’t see the oil doesn’t mean that it’s not there. More importantly, you can’t see the millions of gallons of the oil dispersant Corexit, which was banned in the UK more than 10 years ago due to its toxicity. Yet, it was okay to drop liberally on the Gulf. Perhaps people won’t keel over and die seconds after eating Gulf Coast oysters, but something inside us all knows that they’re not healthy. Yet, our FDA has declared them safe to eat.

If we stay in “winner/loser” mentality, this kind of stuff will go on. The FDA can tell us anything and we will meekly accept it, or oppose it under our breath. In the meantime, untruths become de facto “truths.”

Declaring war on the FDA isn’t a solution any more than their declaring war on MMS. The solution lies in each of us knowing ourselves… who and what we are. We are creators and co-creators of our experience. This includes the folks at the FDA and other agencies we love to oppose.

But remember, everything we oppose gets bigger. It grows. Oppose MMS, please, and watch it grow. Leave it alone, and watch it grow. Why? Because it is yielding results that help life without harming it. As for the FDA, we must speak our truth if they refuse to speak the truth.

We have the power to resolve this situation and grow, because the power to heal belongs with each and every human being, not with doctors, the FDA, the health care system, or anyone else. This may not be common knowledge, but when you listen to people who have healed, you gain insights into your own path. Note that the FDA only wanted information from people who felt they had been damaged by MMS, and claimed that ailments that people have reported success with were unrelated.

To Heal and to Cure Through Balance

The “H” word (heal) and “C” word (cure) are not the province or domain of technology, or pharmacology. If we want to heal ourselves, we need to understand our complicity in the problem’s evolution, and the laws, nature, and dynamics of balance. Then we must commit ourselves to restoring it, because if we are sick, we are not in balance. It’s that simple.

If chemotherapy or radiation helped restore balance, then it should be used. If it does not, it should not. The results will be the indicator. Healing and curing is evidence of balance being restored, not the efficacy of the drug, but of a change that has occurred within the person who was ill. The first change that must happen is in a place that won’t show up in diagnostic tests. The FDA isn’t thinking along these lines. I can’t speak for Jim Humble in that regard. But I can say that he has brought something to the world’s attention that should be noticed, studied, and used.

Ultimately, unseen and immeasurable forces influence the organizational and functional dynamics of the human body. You might call it consciousness. It’s the “who we are” part of the matrix that we’re oftentimes most confused about, and quick to dismiss. When we deny our nature as living consciousness, we also disavail ourselves to amazing power. The agent that makes that power appear to be absent, is fear. The agent that makes it grow, is love.

A chemical focus alone does not cover the bandwidth of the subtle realms, which is permeated with, and by love. However, we now know they’re present and in operation.

From a wonderful book, Spontaneous Evolution, by Bruce H. Lipton and Steve Bhaerman:

There is a famous story of a Native American grandfather talking to his grandchild. “There are two wolves fighting inside me,” said the grandfather. “One of them is of love and peace, the other is the wolf of anger and war.” “Which one will win?” asked the grandchild. “Whichever one I feed.,” was the grandfather’s reply.

MMS: Setting Perceptions Straight, 28% at a Time

4 Replies

Where's the 28% they're talking about?

Where's the 28% they're talking about?

Irrespective of what happens in the journey of MMS, the FDA has done a few good things. They brought the subject to the attention of a larger number of new people, and given those who do understand something about MMS an opportunity to set the misinformation straight.

This is not about “fighting” the FDA. They are doing what they have done, the way they have done things, for quite some time. If you don’t like their methods, then you have the power, ability, and responsibility to let them know. One way to do so, is to use products that you know are in your best health interest, and to not use products that you know will do you harm.

If you believe that MMS will do you harm, you should not take it. This doesn’t mean that MMS should not be available to help others, since we know that it can.

Toxic drugs should also not be given to people who object to their use. A person’s preference against chemotherapy should be respected. Doctors should have more in their tool box than chemo and radiation. Well, they should have other tools altogether to assist healing, unless the patient is actually asking for an agonizingly slow and painful death. This is what so many people get, you’d think they were asking for it. Yet Dr. Jack Kevorkian was vilified and prosecuted for helping people exit this world peacefully and of their own free will. If you’re kicking and screaming in pain, able to pay the bill or insurance premiums, but acting like you don’t want to die, it’s okay for them to poison you.

Doctors will try to coerce (not being the FDA, they can’t force) you into taking the drugs their “book” recommends, even if you have legitimate reservations. This policy should be changed. Any reservation about taking a drug is a legitimate one. I can understand a pain killer in a moment of extreme duress, but not in the absence of a conscious, concerted effort to help the patient restore health.

It’s ironic to see the moral “high ground” anti-drug crusaders take on marijuana and other street drugs, while sanctimoniously claiming they are not addicted to their even more expensive prescribed, and therefore accepted medicine. They get the benefits of addiction without the social and legal stigma attached.

However, drugs are not helpful if one’s goal is health and/or healing. Don’t take my word for it. Listen to a former pharmaceutical sales person tell how business is done.

Now, here’s a short video I produced that describes how MMS is prepared, and explains the confusion around the 28% solution, which is one of the reasons that the FDA claimed it is dangerous.

Let’s thank the FDA once again for giving us the opportunity to set perceptions straight to such a large new audience.

Desired MMS Outcomes, Power, and Beliefs

5 Replies

Jim Humble the educator prepares to teach at MMS workshop.

I have suffered from Epstein Barr Virus for 20 years & YES my first two weeks on MMS I ended up getting the worst chest cold I had in years. This was a form of detox to my body. I had pneumonia many years prior & had the best removal of hardened junk come out of my lungs. I could literally taste the ephedrine HCI (an energy pill I abused yrs ago) in my mouth and smell it in my nasal passages as that came to the surface too. After my cold ended I felt like a million bucks w/no EBV symptoms! — From YouTube viewer responding to Jim Humble’s FDA response

I received an email from a nervous MMS supplier, concerned about the potential ripple effect that might come from the FDA’s campaign. Her concerns are legitimate, but then each person has to ask, what can I do?

We operate in a mindset of they are “big,” and we are “small”, or “they have money and we don’t.” This is the thinking that has contributed to where we are today. We belittle ourselves and tacitly stand by while the “authorities” run roughshod over our freedoms, without a hint of exception on our part.

This is because we don’t know how to use our power. We think that power is in what we have, or in the case of powerlessness, what someone else has that we don’t. The truth is that power is within us all. We’re using it all the time, except it’s mostly unconscious. Anyone who thinks they are a victim is using their power to maintain their state. Have you heard the term, “the rich get richer while the poor get poorer?” There’s a clue there that often goes unnoticed.

Simply put, “rich” are those who see possibility in everything. “Poor” are those who predominantly see, and operate from a mindset of impossibility. While we cannot see, feel, touch, or otherwise measure or quantify them, beliefs are the switches that either turn on, or turn off possibility for an individual. They are bridges to knowing. A person who knows has the power of manifestation. If you “know” that you are sick, or poor, or inadequate, or unworthy, then you have, and are using your power to manifest your experience. You may not have been “the cause,” but you have made yourself susceptible, where others are not. On the other hand, others may be susceptible to conditions that don’t affect you. If we were to examine beliefs and attitudes, the wide range of experiences that we observe would make far more sense. We’d see a correlation between the creator of the experience and the experience itself, and not the random, haphazard process that appears so real.

We create different experiences by adopting new knowing. This is why knowledge is power. New knowledge and hence, knowing, are gained be demonstrating the willingness to adopt and embrace new set of potentiating beliefs. In other words, since present knowing is supported by beliefs. New knowing begins as information, which becomes knowledge that is then processed through, and integrated within a mind that was opened via new beliefs.

Any “poor” or “sick” person can transform their life. However, he will never be rich or well again without a prior belief change. Seeing is believing mentality will not work. One must believe, or be willing to believe in the new outcome, in order to see and ultimately experience it.

Only when one believes that wealth and health are possible and inevitable, does it even become potential. From potential the new reality becomes probable, and with more visualization and acceptance of its inevitability, it becomes actual. The process is like tuning into a specific radio frequency to play the station that delivers the music that you enjoy.

If you are convinced that your particular situation cannot be rectified, or your doctors have convinced you with their “data,” then you will be right. Change will not happen until you accept that it is possible, even if you don’t know how. The evidence that the change you seek for yourself is possible, is any positive change that anyone has experienced that were “against all odds.” What we don’t tend to understand is that we are the only one who has to believe in our very powerful nature in order to begin to consciously use it to change our world.

This applies to health too. If we are sick, especially those that evolved through the degenerative effects of over chemicalization, medical doctors, with their pages upon pages of printouts and test results, and their narrow focus on what is possible and what is not, then we’ll need to take stock with our true desires, as well as our true power.

My response to the MMS distributor triggered these thoughts, related to visualizing a different outcome from what many people are presently imagining.

I wrote:

I don’t know you, but I will say that you need to consult, not your mind, but your heart on what YOUR best move is. Ask your heart if you should power down and disappear, or whether you should continue to make MMS available? If you have no health claims on your web site, and it is a water purification product – which it has always been – then you must decide where you will stand, or whether you will.

You can also help by literally spending some time each day SEEING, again with your heart, the desired OUTCOME, ALREADY DONE. What is the desired outcome?

  • FDA RETRACTS its warning against MMS and explains to the public how it erred
  • That MMS be OPENLY available to the public, without feeling need to tiptoe around the FDA
  • The FDA knows and EMBRACES its therapeutic properties
  • LEGITIMATE clinical trials are done with MMS, comparing it against other antibacterial agents
  • MMS is integrated as a standard medical protocol
  • MMS remains inexpensive and widely available
  • Sellers (of MMS or ANY new modality that has shown merit) are not targeted and persecuted by the FDA
  • FDA doesn’t target or persecute ANYONE… that persecution and intimidation aren’t part of their operational ethos
  • Daniel Smith and all MMS sellers are held harmless, as they have harmed no one
  • Human health improves, by whatever means necessary…

One very important aspect to this exercise, is not being attached to the outcome. In other words, letting go. Letting go of attachment actually connects you to the outcome that you seek. It allows you to become one with it. Attachment to how things turn out, or fear about it, maintains a connection to what is feared. Beliefs are the activators or deactivators that we can change.

If you’d like to add to this vision of desired outcomes, please free to do so.

There’s nothing to lose, except perhaps if we don’t practice.

FDA: MMS is Harmful, and Gulf Oysters are ‘Good to Go’

3 Replies

MMS in spray bottle for topical applications.

It’s great to be back home, even while the drama surrounding MMS continues to unfold. The FDA is, albeit unintentionally, calling more attention to MMS and itself by embarking on this latest smear campaign. It’s a smear campaign because due diligence has not been followed on the FDA’s part. This is becoming the rule, not the isolated exception.

MMS is just one, and perhaps the latest example, of the FDA, like a latter-day Nero, fiddling with a promising medicinal compound or product while America’s health continues to burn. They use power because they have it, and have no compunction to criminalize people where no crime has actually taken place. Using coercion and intimidation behind the scenes, and misinformation and fear through the media, they show no concern for truth, no willingness to take a balanced look at all sides, to weigh the true merits of MMS versus any possible downside.

Such practices are not part of the FDA method because the truth about MMS and chlorine dioxide would reveal something they really don’t want you to look at; i.e., the absolute uselessness of the expensive, caustic, and death accelerating medications that the Agency has sanctioned and authorized for decades, bought and paid for by millions of human lives, in America and around the world.

I was particularly saddened last year when former NBA basketball player and jazz musician, Wayman Tisdale passed away due to the effects of the standard cancer treatment he received, in response to bone cancer condition. He took the chemotherapy, admittedly, a powerful dose. Then his leg was amputated. That was supposed to solve the problem. Then when it didn’t, more chemotherapy was called for. The logic was that he was a “big guy”, so the doctors surmised that they needed stronger medicine. He died, not from bone cancer, but from acute esophagitis, at just 44 years of age. That’s a problem with the throat.

Wayman Tisdale after leg amputation.

What could esophagitis possibly have to do with bone cancer in the leg?

Simply, the caustic substance, much like battery acid, had to be swallowed. If you listen to the FDA, MMS is made to sound like this. But then if that were true, it would be harmful. It would also bring about the kind of results that the FDA appears to think is acceptable, as long as you’ve paid the price of “protection”.

All the king’s horses and all the king’s MD’s, haven’t figured out that chemotherapy and radiation make the environment even more conducive to tumor growth. In his workshop Jim Humble repeatedly instructs that the sicker a person is, the less MMS should be used. Not because using more is dangerous, because it won’t harm them in the amounts suggested, but that it may be unnecessary in order to help the body’s innate healing processes get started.

The medical establishment and the FDA, which went to the same schools and are under the same umbrella of thought, think that the drugs actually heal or “cure.” Mr. Humble, and many more who have helped healing occur, realize that drugs inhibit, rather than facilitate healing. They give you the suggestion of relief by blocking pain sensation, while the reason for the pain either remains in tact or is escalated.

The body may need only a small amount of assistance to activate its own internal mechanisms to bring about healing. The mind must be on-board as well. This is actually more important. Current medical orthodoxy doesn’t embrace this kind of thinking, which is okay by me, except when they try to convince the public that a different approach that IS showing promise is harmful, but consider methods that Wayman Tisdale faced to be acceptable. That’s when they lose their credibility, and any right to dictate my choices.

There are thousands of Wayman Tisdales quietly passing out of this world each year through unnecessary, ineffective cancer treatment, while hundreds of millions of dollars are collected each year, often by sincere people, to find a “cure.” Yet, the FDA would persecute innocent people who have seen the merits (and positive results) of the human use of a disinfectant, and drive it off the market.

If this is acceptable to you, then do nothing, say nothing, read no more.

And perhaps, have some oysters from the Corexit and hydrocarbon marinated Gulf of Mexico, because the FDA says they’re good to go.

Here is a video response to the FDA that I shot on my most recent visit with Jim Humble.

Listen to more on Talk For Food

After a two week hiatus — couldn’t get a good internet connection to upload from there — here is my Talk For Food show, which includes a longer interview with the Jim Humble, and with a woman who conquered (not “survived”) breast cancer with the help of MMS.

Click here to listen…