A Real Life ‘Clinical Trial’ Opportunity for MMS
Many new people are being introduced to MMS, the “Miracle Mineral Supplement,” in part due to the FDA warning against it, but also, from more credible sources; i.e., doctors and other health care practitioners who know that, when used as directed, it is a safe, effective, powerful, and inexpensive detoxifier. While it’s not likely you’re going to see Dr. House recommend using MMS to stop flesh-eating bacteria (although it would) anytime soon (perhaps by next season), a growing population of naturopathic, chiropractic, and even some quiet MD’s have studied the chemistry, weighed the evidence, and seen the potential benefit, enough to incorporate it into their practice.
As such, there is also a growing demand for information about MMS, not so much from those who want to shut it down, but from people who want to help themselves and others improve their well-being in spite of the myriad of “ordinary” factors that tend to compromise health, which start at the most basic, fundamental, and overlooked of areas; water.
Water content percentages in an adult human body.
The human body is over 70% water, by weight. However, life doesn’t begin that way. While in utero, upon its inception and development into a human form, the body is almost 100% water. Water is — as I suggested at a talk I gave with Ann Cullen in London at the NutriCentre in the Hale Clinic — the medium by and through which we enter this world. We are not physical forms; we are intelligent, living consciousness. Our bodies are energy and informational patterns that coalesce, organize, and form in water. If the water is not pristine, balanced, and energy rich; if it is unbalanced and full of distortion, then how can the formation, and hence the pregnancy flawless? Healthy water creates healthy bodies. And yet, water is routinely deadened, by adding chlorine and other chemicals, with apparently little concern over how this simple, accepted practice may be contributing to the health problems that show up later in life. The good news is that water’s health can be restored easily.
A water station in Cite Soleil district in Port-au-Prince, Haiti
For a reminder of the importance of water we have to look no further than the unfolding events in Haiti. Still reeling from a devastating earthquake in January 2010, Haiti’s citizens are now dying of cholera. This is a clear, direct, and timely example of the ramifications of unhealthy water run amok. However, instead of looking at how to deploy a proven water purifier in the chlorite matrix, the main therapeutic component in MMS, the authorities — including the CDC — are compiling an arsenal of antibiotics with which to treat people after the fact. They want to deal with the effects by trying to kill the bugs (if they can), but not the cause, which would be done by clarifying the water.
The World Health Organization’s (WHO) solution includes powdered chlorine, which continues the cycle of producing derivative contaminates, the trihalomethanes or “THM’s”. This demonstrates either how blind the establishment has become to fundamental causes of illness and disease, or how indifferent they are.
I believe that chlorination and fluoridation, which produce halogen substitutes for chloride (Cl-) — essential in the proper function of the Krebs Cycle — is a direct cause of full spectrum of health problems, including breast cancer. This theory could be tested in a “clinical trial” by simply selecting a method that does not inundate the body with carcinogens, ensuring sufficient chloride and oxygen uptake, and seeing what happens.
I drank some of the bottled water when I visited Haiti in April, and my throat tensed up as it went down. Its energy was so chaotic, it seemed to be dryer than before I swallowed. The label on the bottle indicated that it was “purified,” produced via reverse osmosis process. However, biologically inert, processed water alone is not the solution. For there to be health or healing, the water itself must be healthy, energy-rich, and coherent. There are some water sources that naturally fit that criteria, and technologies that can transform existing water and restore its coherence.
Used on a large-scale basis, the chlorite matrix would certainly deliver sufficient oxygen to safely disinfect the water and make it safe to drink. Barring that, with the help of Jim Humble’s protocol, MMS can be used effectively and safely to generate a detoxified version of chlorine dioxide (ClO2-) in smaller quantities, to be added to water before drinking, or it can be taken internally to prevent, or arrest cholera on the back end.
MMS is effective against cholera, malaria, and dengue fever.
Not being satisfied with people simply being well, certain “scientists” would prefer risking the deaths of countless individuals by withholding treatment to a control group via a “double-blind” study in order to prove that the new treatment worked. When you’re talking about a drug that didn’t exist a year ago, and itself is synthetic, it makes sense. But the chlorite matrix has proven itself to be a natural disinfectant, yet we have kept it in the closet when it could have been used extensively to save lives.
Jim Humble’s 5-day workshop covers many ways to prepare and use MMS, along with a wide range of situations in which it might apply. He discusses the protocols, which have been updated, and shows how to prepare it, in small amounts for personal use, or for large.
Listen
Just click the player below to listen.
Wolf to Henhouse: “Just Say ‘No’ to MMS!”
Who is there to warn the public against these?
The interest in, and use of “MMS,” which Jim Humble has recently dubbed, Master Mineral Supplement, continues, as the United Kingdom has publicly denounced the use of this product. Even the often reliable Wikipedia, which usually presents the appearance of unbiased information, now presents an entry on MMS that is a boldface lie.
A story in the BBC recently reported that the Food Standards Agency (FSA) praised a 15 year-old with Crohn’s disease for alerting it to MMS. Now chlorine dioxide, which is generated by using MMS (along with a citric acid “activator”), could in fact, help someone with Crohn’s disease.
“Why?”, you might ask.
It’s pretty simple. Anyone who has Crohn’s symptoms is going to have an inner system that is out of balance. I believe we can agree on this.
Balance is synonymous with health. When an individual not healthy, they will not be in balance. Yet, if balance is restored, health returns.
Most current medical treatment methods don’t restore balance. Not only that, most current living methods compromise balance on many levels. One of the most fundamental places where imbalance, and hence, disease is started, is in our water.
Chemicals are foundation of modern water treatment.
Current methods of water treatment are most effective in giving us water that looks good, but are ineffective in providing water that is actually healthy. In fact, water that comes to the tap, as well as many bottled waters are touted to be safe, are actually highly chemicalized, with chlorine (a bleach), fluoride, ammonia, and many other inorganic materials. And yet, in light of the urgent warnings against using MMS, the cumulative effects of this ongoing, daily intake of inorganic information is given no consideration anywhere in the current medical treatment matrix. According to the authorities, the bleach called MMS shouldn’t be used, but the bleach that is being used, without any input or consent by the public, is okay.
And if you don’t already know it, chlorine and chlorine dioxide demonstrate very different chemical behavior.
Humans are ingesting a multitude of inorganic and synthetic chemicals daily in going about the business of living life. A significant portion of this is through ingesting chlorinated water, about which no warnings or calls for reductions are being made.
When it combines with other materials, chlorine spins off another group of chemicals called, trihalomethanes (THMs). They are made up of chloroform, bromodichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, and bromoform. All of these are known carcinogens, which mean they can increase the likelihood of cancer. Imagine that this IS going on today, every day, each year, and for decades.
Look at some of the many pathologies linked to iodine deficiency, which is estimated to affect 2 billion people. Iodine is a natural antibacterial, and needed to produce the thyroid hormone. Potential problems include hypothyroidism, goiter, mental retardation and birth defects, and breast cancer.
Iodine is a member of a group of elements on the Periodic Table called halogens, as are chlorine and fluoride. However, it is the only essential trace element among them. In other words, iodine is essential for health. The other halogens are, in fact, harmful. Could it be that getting so much incidental chlorine and fluoride through water intake leaves less room for iodine, which we admittedly get too little of?
Yet, there are no warnings or suggestions forthcoming from the watchdog agencies of this dire situation or that we should adopt other methods.
Are you hearing me on this? Chlorination produces byproducts that are known carcinogens. Yet, it continues to be the “disinfectant of choice” among water treatment agencies around the world. According to americanchemistry.com, the chlorine industry “contributes” $46 billion to the North American economy annually. Included in their list their contributions:
- Clean drinking water
- 93 percent of all life-saving pharmaceuticals
- 86 percent of crop protection compounds
“Clean” drinking water is not necessarily safe drinking water. Safe drinking water will actually hydrate you and reduce toxicity. Clean water, as it is presently treated, can actually increase the body’s toxic load.
While it may not kill you on ingestion, ingesting chemically treated, i.e., chlorinated water will slowly and steadily deteriorate health. One exception, based on its known chemical behavior, is chlorine dioxide, which actually decreases the toxic presence in the environment when taken in appropriate amounts.
Drinking is only one of the ways that we ingest water, and not even the major way. The main way that we intake water is through showering and bathing. It is absorbed directly through the skin. When water is chlorinated, we turn our showers into gas chambers, open our pores, and step in.
That is, unless we take conscious, and heretofore unconventional measures to counteract the effects of our “advanced” ways. Based on the results that people have reported after using MMS, it appears to be doing something beneficial. And yet, none of the “protective agencies” around the world have seen fit to investigate for right doing, so convinced they appear to be that something “wrong” is being done.
Chlorine isn’t the only chemical culprit that we have developed a blind eye and deaf ear to. Fluoride is right up there, having gained a privileged general perception as beneficial; so good in fact, that it is put in water, toothpaste, and supplement tablets, including some vitamins.
Is this an accurate representation of fluoride's effects?
Fluoride is a neurotoxin. Taking it on a regular basis can compromise health. Long-standing evidence bears the statement out. A 1992 report published by the New Jersey Department of Health found that bone cancer in male children was two to seven times greater in areas where water was fluoridated. Another study linked fluoridation of water to uterine cancer deaths.
There is no scientific or experiential evidence to support the FDA and FSA’s claims against MMS. It’s chemical behavior suggests that, if scaled down to sufficiently enough, it should reduce toxicity, and if that is done, health should improve. That is what has happened, and perhaps why the world is not being warned against using MMS.
We could go on for days listing the chemicals that, on a daily basis, are routinely ingested, either through water, in gaseous form, in our foods and beverages, or via airborne inhalation, which ultimately cause cellular stress and eventually metabolic dysfunction within the body. Not only are no actions being taken toward warning the public, reducing and replacing these methods, the remedies that we are offered to counteract the effects of these products — and are incessantly admonished to “ask our doctors” about — are also more chemicals.
Health care costs are rising, yet disease onset is coming earlier in life, and staying longer. Yet, MMS has been deemed by these and other “experts,” a dangerous bleach.
I’m inclined to believe that the 15-year-old with Crohn’s disease who, if we are to believe the story, notified the authorities about MMS, is most likely not aware of these nuances of its chemistry. The greater darkness, however, is awareness of his own chemistry which, even after several decades or even a lifetime, is a darkness shared by the general public.
The FSA and FDA should know better. They should be letting the youngster, and the public know about MMS, in the context of how it can actually help his young body reduce its toxic load. But then, that would mean dumping all the chemical stuff they have been supporting, and having to admit that they have been wolves guarding the henhouse and all its chicks.
MMS: The ‘Bleach’ is On!
Let’s give the FDA, Health Canada, the Ministry of Health (Japan) and National Health Service (UK), a round of applause and gratitude. With the able assistance of a league of similar “watchdog” agencies around the world, they have increased MMS awareness. The fact that the information they have spread is misleading or downright false, is of less concern, as there will be time and opportunity for clarification.
There will always be those who, trusting “the authorities,” will follow their guidelines to the letter. There will also be those who elect to do their homework, have seen the misplaced priorities and ulterior motives that are at play with announcements that claim to “protect the public.” This latter group will make their own decisions about what’s harmful or harmless about this “bleach.”
“Bleach” is also the subject of a new rash of debates about Jim Humble’s MMS protocol. Reciting the FDA chapter and verse, the nouveau MMS critics claim that chlorine dioxide is a bleach, as though that’s the beginning and the end of discussion. They dismissively proclaim that anyone silly enough to drink bleach must have a screw loose. Yet, the very same critics will very likely bathe or shower in chlorinated water each day, the effects of which are worse than drinking it.
If you didn’t already know it, chlorine is also a “bleach.” It’s a distinction worth knowing, about which the FDA must have thought few would notice, or care.
The term “bleach” is used in a pejorative context with regard to chlorine dioxide, yet since chlorine is also a bleach, then it is either equally “dangerous” (some people mistakenly assume it’s the same thing), or there really are different chemical behaviors at play.
This subject is covered in my documentary, Understanding MMS: Conversations with Jim Humble. However, here is a thumbnail explanation.
Although chlorine dioxide has "chlorine" in its name,
its chemistry is radically different from that of chlorine. When reacting with other substances, it is weaker and more selective. For example, it does not react with ammonia or most organic compounds. Chlorine dioxide oxygenates products rather than chlorinating them. Therefore, unlike chlorine, chlorine dioxide does not produce environmentally undesirable organic compounds containing chlorine. [Source Clordisys.com
The interesting thing about the chlorine versus chlorine dioxide conversation lies in considering the uproar over the new kid (chlorine dioxide), with the claims of its associated danger. It smacks of the tale of chicken little who declared that the sky was falling.
It wasn’t and didn’t.
MMS users have reported, and continue to report amazing improvements in their health, a fact that critics would rather not look at. The FDA only asked for negative information from the public in issuing their warning. If improvements from such a wide range of pathologies have been reported by actual MMS users, this should be cause for greater interest and attempts at confirmation, instead of attempts to shut down.
I write this as another group of sincere souls prepare to “race for the cure” this weekend, and the public is made to be more “aware” of breast cancer.
The radio announcer in the spots for this weekend’s “race for the cure” says that “we’re closer than ever.”
“Oh really?”
Suppose it is as simple as using the right bleach, and disinfecting a chemically overloaded body. Now I know that MMS is not a cure all. I don’t even suggest that it would be all that is needed. However, it is very effective at doing something that has been generally overlooked.
I’ll talk more about that further down.
Just today while writing this article the first time (a momentary power outage during an electrical storm sent it to the ethers), the phone rang. From Houston, the caller was inquiring about the Photonic Water transformation technology. Somehow the conversation turned toward MMS. She was quick to let me know she was familiar with this one.
Before I could say that I knew a thing or two about it, the caller let me know that she recognized me, and then said that MMS has helped her children improve dramatically from autism spectrum disorder.
A former ophthalmologist, MMS was suggested to her by another doctor friend. She said she had tried a multitude of ways to help her children, but they showed dramatic improvements after they began taking MMS. This was on the “old school” regimen. (Children were never given 15 drops at a time under the original protocol, but up to 3 drops per 25 lbs of body weight. That limitation still applies in the 8 hourly dose regimen.)
The caller is now practicing energy medicine, as her horizons have continued to expand after her original introduction to MMS. And yet, in spite of her success, she is at odds with the autism activist group, Defeat Autism Now! (D.A.N.), part of the Autism Research Institute. The group asserts that autism is treatable, but it appears that the “treatment” may also include a chemical-based component.
One of the salient points that I made with the caller, is that with all the hubbub about MMS being “dangerous bleach,” few are considering the effects of the daily bleaching that millions in America and around the world currently go through via chlorination. Many are trying their best to remove chlorine – resorting to expensive treatment methods – to no avail. This is one of the important aspects of water transformation that looms on the horizon.
The talk about the lack of clinical trials and publishing in “peer review journals” on MMS are laughable when you consider the absence of any long-term studies or published papers on studies on how health faired when water was treated without chlorine.
Furthermore, it would be interesting to observe the effects of removing synthetic materials – toxins, heavy metals, etc. – from the body. Chlorine dioxide appears to do this very well. Again, I say this based on results that have been reported.
For all the talk about “good” and “bad” bacteria, it has become evident that no living organism exists to do us harm. However, the non-living, the synthetic, and unnatural will bring about cellular stress, disrupt metabolic function, and instigate one’s decline into degenerative disease.
We have operated under the mistaken idea that technology is superior to Mother Nature, and we are paying the high price of our arrogance and ignorance. Yet, many still ignore what is staring them in the face.
Chlorine dioxide appears to discharge, by way of electron exchange, the low level, inorganic disruptors that are deemed close enough to the real thing, such as vitamin D, to be acceptable substitutes, in addition to such other additives as aspartame, MSG, and many more. In truth, they are not acceptable. They don’t kill you on contact, but they don’t help sustain or restore health. These facts are hard to deny.
What if autism spectrum disorder is simply one way that the body, and the being, responds to certain types and levels of chemicalization?
It has been demonstrated that when chlorine interacts with the chemicals within the body, tertiary chemical compounds are produced. These compounds can be carcinogenic. Yet, this “bleach” is acceptable… not only acceptable, but its use unquestioned.
On the other hand, the “bleach” that people are reporting positive results from, is branded harmful and dangerous.
There is something far bigger hiding in plain sight that either the FDA and its cronies don’t see, or don’t want you to see. A public whitewash that has gone on for generations. Before installing a Photonic unit on my showers, I used to see that “ashy” stuff on my skin every day, and think it was “dry”. I now know it was the chemical bath that I had embraced as my own problem. They can try to run the game, but they can’t hide it anymore, because the bleach is ON!
MMS: The ‘Fit’ Has Hit the ‘Shan’
Jim Humble, who introduced the MMS Protocol
BARAHONA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC – Fasten your seatbelts, because the MMS story is about to take the greatest roller coaster ride of its life. The FDA is following up its July 30, 2010 warning on the personal and discretionary use of chlorine dioxide with a vengeance, having picked out a sampling of MMS suppliers in the United States and Japan (yes, Japan), to begin a global dissuasion campaign that you can be sure, will be televised.
On the heels of their warning, a convoy of FDA agents appeared at PGL International (www.projectgreenlife.com), in Spokane, Washington, and their fulfillment house, intent on gathering “forensic” evidence of wrongdoing.
On the same day, on the other side of the world, agents from the Drug Regulation and Monitoring Agency, a unit of Japan’s Ministry of Health, visited an MMS supplier in Tokyo, while agents from the Health and Hygiene Agency made another impromptu call to a distributor in Osaka.
According to a reliable source, the tone of the Japanese encounters was decidedly different from those in Spokane. After three days of investigation, the FDA representatives made their objective very clear; a full recall of all MMS sold. To make the appearance of justification of wrongdoing and harm to the public complete, they were offering no consideration to the company owners.
The purpose of a recall isn’t so much about returning MMS to the suppliers, it would amount to an admission of wrongdoing, of harm having been done on the public (who the FDA is “protecting,”), for which some form of “punishment” would be in order. The Agency has been mobilized to make discrediting MMS a priority, facts and evidence to the contrary, be damned.
IF “wrong” had been done, if harm had been done, I would be in full agreement with the Agency. However, they appear, curiously to be inactive and disinterested in the harm that happens daily America, thanks to drugs that they have evaluated, collected very high application fees for, and approved. MMS’ major “sin,” according to the FDA is, (1) not having gone through the approval cycle, and (2) making fantastic (presumed to be false and fraudulent) claims for what they call unrelated conditions.
The question of whether the claims, reported, not by the MMS sellers, but by people who have used it, are true, has not been considered. If the claims are true, then it may mean that the diseases mentioned, are not unrelated.
The FDA wants to discredit MMS before enough people put “2 + 2” together and begin asking these questions.
I suspect that it is too late.
MMS is not the only “public domain” chemical on the block that can point to fantastic claims that are true. Dimethyl Sulfoxide, otherwise known as DMSO, is another which is backed by over 40 years of clinical research. It was first formulated by Dr. Stanley Jacob at the University of Oregon Medical School.
DMSO: Nature’s Healer, written by Dr. Morton Walker and published over 20 years ago, lists research that began in the late 1950’s, when DMSO, a non-toxic chemical derived from tree sap, was shown to have a multitude of beneficial properties as a beneficial solvent. For example, instead of prescribing an anticoagulant to stroke patients, that “thins” the blood so as to facilitate circulation through an obstructed passageway, DMSO, with its extraordinary penetration characteristics, would simply and safely dissolve the clot, without introducing new toxicity into the body.
The scope of research done on DMSO is extensive. Symposiums of medical professionals were convened, as doctors envisioned and exchanged ideas on how they could improve their craft. Except… the FDA granted only very limited approval.
You can buy DMSO in a feed store to rub down your horse, but there are precious few places where you can get knowledgeable advice on human use, other than in books and on the Internet.
Living clay – Calcium bentonite – is another natural, non-toxic substance that can bring relief to a wide range of ailments. (See www.aboutclay.com)
The FDA should be working in the public interest. However, their efforts should be based on incontrovertible facts. Their case against MMS doesn’t rest on such a basis.
Harm Has Actually Been Done?
The FDA’s warning claims “serious harm” from drinking MMS. They said that, when used as directed, it produces an industrial bleach that can cause harm to health.
Examples of harm that they mention include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and symptoms of severe dehydration. These are indeed results that some MMS users have reported, but MMS is growing in popularity because they also reported recovery from the real problem that they sought relief from. This stands in stark contrast to most medicines used today.
Multiple unrelated diseases?
The FDA warning lists claims to treat “multiple unrelated diseases,” which include HIV, hepatitis, the H1N1 flu virus, common colds, acne, cancer, and other conditions. The operative word here is “unrelated.” If the reports, submitted by actual MMS users, are true, and if there are other products that have shown a similar level of effectiveness against a wide range of pathologies, then perhaps these conditions are related in spite of FDA statements to the contrary. IF they are, then the question shifts back to the FDA, the medical system, and the entire industry that has operated under the dissection principle, where diseases are considered isolated conditions that warrant very specific, and oftentimes multiple, simultaneous (and expensive) treatments.
No Interest Shown in MMS’ benefits.
In coming out in a decidedly aggressive effort to stem any further growth of MMS, the FDA reveals a blatant bias in the absence of interest in its beneficial effects. Excuse me if I’m wrong, but the last time I checked, plans were still being made for another walk, run, bicycle ride, or concert to raise money for cancer research. Telethons are being done for Jerry’s Kids, and many other worthy causes. Chlorine is a chemical that is routinely introduced into the human body without one’s consent, as is fluoridation, through municipal water treatment systems. NO ONE, certainly not the FDA, has taken an unbiased look at the health effects of several generations of this practice. So the bias doesn’t really appear to be for the public, as the FDA claims in its warning. It actually seems to be working against us.
What can YOU do?
As I said at the end of my documentary, Understanding MMS: Conversations with Jim Humble, the MMS protocol appears to have properties that could be very useful to society, specifically due to the effects it has on water. No health claims are really necessary. No promises are needed. It’s become widely known public knowledge that water quality, and water treatment methods, are not producing optimal results, and may indeed be contributing to the state of human health. Yet, the damage associated with these practices still go unexamined, or unreported.
If you have credible information, good or bad, about MMS, I invite you to send it to: [email protected].
Additionally I’d like to produce a documentary on the subject, asking and answering the unasked questions on this timely and soon to be controversial subject.
If you would like to contribute to the production effort, please send a donation via PayPal to the same email address above.
MMS Workshop: Back to Barahona and Haitian Memories
I’m heading back to the Dominican Republic, to do a Mulligan on the 5-day MMS Seminar and Workshop, in the coastal town of Barahona (pronounced, bah-RO-na). The timing of the FDA assault on MMS, where they mobilize their forces against a product that they have not given a fair, unbiased evaluation, in spite (or because of) the positive results people are getting, makes this a great opportunity to get Jim’s take on the entire situation while people from around the world travel to this tropical setting to learn about MMS from the man himself.
Jim Humble on camera in Barahona (1st MMS Seminar)
The first seminar, an experience that spanned two weeks, was amazing. It wasn’t just the learning, which went virtually non-stop from 9am-5pm, but getting to know the people and their own motivations for traveling such distances. Coming from as far away as Norway, Bosnia, England and Germany, plus Columbia and Peru in addition to Canada, Puerto Rico and the U.S., a diverse mix of backgrounds, languages, and customs were all set aside by the common desire to help others and help one’s self.
Jim Humble at the Whiteboard (MMS Seminar #1)
We stayed in a dorm-like setting (I understand there are private rooms now), men in one area, women in another. One of the men quickly gained a reputation for his snoring. He also distinguished himself for his dedication to helping others when five of us took a memorable trip to Haiti.
This doesn't even BEGIN to show how bad it was in Haiti.
We connected with a group of Korean missionaries, who agreed to receive us and give us an overnight place to stay. We agreed to assist them, as they sponsored a program to bring American doctors in to examine and treat the sick. Although they had never heard about MMS, they were curious, as were our hosts, as to what brought us there. They listened with open minds.
Presenting MMS concept to our Korean missionary hosts.
The real presenter was a young woman, Jenny Jung, a Korean native who now lives in Atlanta. She witnessed her father’s amazing recovery from a chronic ailment, and a year of prescribed steroid treatments which were not only ineffective, but degenerative. Yet, a short time after taking MMS, he was back to normal. Jenny decided that she had to tell the Korean world about MMS (a mission she has since embarked upon).
Jenny Hye Young (Jung) speaks from experience.
The group asked questions, and took MMS themselves. One of the doctors, who had eczema, applied an MMS solution directly, with a sprayer. The next morning he reported that the infected area definitely felt better. All of them wanted copies of Jim Humble’s book, which Jenny took the initiative to purchase and bring to give away. Two of the four doctors also prepared the 8-hour cocktail, a 3-drop per hour dosing, and drank 1/8th each hour during the course of a grueling next day’s work.
A doctor takes MMS break while administering to Haitians.
We were given permission by the missionaries and the doctors, to set up a station that Haitians who came in for treatment, were directed to, particularly those with malaria or dengue fever. We were the next to last stop… the last one being a laying on of hands, also by the doctors according to their faith, and earnest, fervent prayer. The FDA would dismiss such nonsense, especially since it can’t be patented, but the last two stations on that day were, in my opinion, the most powerful.
The last stop...
As the day wore on, an enthusiasm had emerged for this new-found and useful discovery.
Two doctors use MMS in spray to disinfect hands.
There are many beneficial clinical uses for chlorine dioxide, in the levels that Jim Humble has tested and proven, for anyone who really cares to look.
Using MMS topically on Haitian man.
We even sprayed some on an emaciated puppy that was clearly in need of some pathogen reduction.
A puppy gets MMS spray.
The entire experience was moving in ways that words cannot adequately express. All of this would get dismissed by an FDA as it thinks today. When the business of disease has become a growth industry, when television advertisements pander to the belief in the eventuality of sickness, and even a friendly suggestion of a glass of water to a dehydrated person can be construed as practicing medicine without a license, things have gone too far. Health and healing are clearly no longer important, when you would shut a promising modality down while not having all the relevant answers yourself. A relevant answer is one that helps the questioner achieve a desired goal. Survival is the bare minimum of what a cancer patient wants to do. They want to be healthy again. For all of the billions that they have raised and extracted from the public, cancer treatment industry and the FDA doesn’t offer any approved cancer treatment modalities that allow any confidence of healthy longevity. Yet, people are curing themselves of cancer and many other diseases of our times, by going “off-the-grid,” and back to balance.
In its way, MMS helps restore balance. It’s not the only way, but it is an effective way to do so.
I’m going back to Barahona to record Jim Humble’s next complete MMS workshop. Well into his 70′s, he has continued his research. We owe it to ourselves to learn more about chlorine dioxide, since it has been brought to our attention. You can pre-order the package, which will include at least 8 DVDs, by clicking the link below. The workshop tuition is $750. The course materials, certificates, and DVD-set, are $350.
Cover Art for MMS Seminar DVD-Set
FDA Warning on MMS: Your Hypocrisy is Showing
Drug watchdog "protects" and "serves" who?
In a move that surprised no one, the FDA has finally taken an official position on the Miracle Mineral Supplement, known by most by the acronym, “MMS.” In a July 30 news release, the agency warned of “serious harm from drinking MMS.” This is a trend that began in May, with a Media Advisory against MMS issued by Health Canada, which cited two complaints it had received. In June, Spain followed suit with its own ban on MMS imports. Having no complaints of its own, it justified its action on Canada’s. The FDA said it has received several reports of health injuries from consumers who used MMS. They included what many who have successfully worked through their health challenges recognize as positive signs, i.e., nausea, vomiting (not guaranteed, but not unexpected either). Diarrhea wasn’t mentioned by name, but they did mention life-threatening low blood pressure from dehydration.
I don’t mean to minimize any of this, but given the numbers of people, now estimated to be in the millions, who have used MMS in the past two plus years, this is tantamount to overwhelming evidence of its benign and beneficial nature. People are not afraid to share bad news, and even make up bad news if it isn’t bad enough. So the overwhelming number of unsolicited positive results shared by MMS users, are significant.
The FDA news release indicates that the agency is considering criminal or civil actions as appropriate “to protect the public from this potentially dangerous product.”
I’m sorry, but this is such hooey, I can hardly stand it.
It is IRONIC that this announcement comes at a time when BP has been running Corexit sorties over the Gulf of Mexico for over three months now, dropping thousands of gallons of this material daily, in a feeble attempt to disperse the oil mass, all the while adding toxic insult to technological injury. They drop the Corexit, which is banned for use on oil spills in the U.K., and is high in benzene and other poisonous chemical agents, while taking no environmentally responsible measures to protect or restore the health of people, wildlife, waterfowl, domestic animals, or coastal lands. In fact, they are applying an unprecedented amount of this admittedly toxic product on an already compromised marine life system. The DISREGARD for human life is blatant.
A year's supply for around $20 bucks.
The FDA is not BP, but the thinking is the same. The FDA thinks that it’s okay to use toxic chemicals on compromised human life systems, as long as the purveyors of the products have jumped through enough hoops and paid sufficient moolah (to the FDA) to “earn” approval. This is why, after trillions have been raised and spent, and millions of lives have succumbed to cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, and millions more contract chronic, degenerative conditions earlier in life, and yet live longer, we’re marching, walking, running, and searching for “cures.”
Yet, in spite of clearly not having found cures for cancer and other popular diseases, the Agency shows no interest in investigating the merits of MMS. You notice that their warning doesn’t even ask for useful information. The public is only asked for adverse information, so that they can build a case to take criminal or civil action. This is “protection” all right, but it’s not protection of public health, or the public interest. The hypocrisy meter is on overload.
In his own way, Jim Humble has baited the FDA and other watchdogs, by saying that MMS “cures” a wide range of ailments, from HIV/AIDS and malaria, to cancer, to the common cold. The FDA warning said that these pathologies are unrelated. That’s part of the problem.
They are related.
Jim Humble reported what he observed, since he took the time and energy to investigate the properties and potential of chlorine dioxide, a chemical that was discovered over 200 years ago and used in water treatment for almost 100 years, if it were applied inside the body, which is 75%-85% water. Indeed, the water that flows inside the body is almost identical in molecular composition to seawater. And when chemicals are used to treat various pathologies in the human body, they tend to exacerbate an already out-of-balanced situation. Chlorine dioxide doesn’t do that. It delivers oxygen into what is oftentimes an environment that is oxygen deficient, and does so without producing new chemical toxicity.
The FDA hasn’t indicated any interest in such details. It says that it is unaware of any research that MMS is effective in treating the myriad diseases that people have reported. The truth is, IF such research were done, it wouldn’t be reported. Even though it is in the public interest to know. Why isn’t the FDA encouraging colleges and universities to do the research? Why are they suggesting that the public throw out their supply? In the interest of the public good, why aren’t they taking the initiative to confirm the claims, which would be monumental if they were verified, instead of do away with any evidence? The answer is that it would be monumental.
Chlorine dioxide would be an amazingly beneficial and effective tool in the operating room, to be used as a topical spray just after surgery, before closing the patient up. According to a 2007 article in the Houston Chronicle, approximately 19,000 people die each year from Staph infections, a number that is probably low. Chlorine dioxide use in medical environments could virtually eliminate that statistic. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA, cannot change enough to take itself out of the range of chlorine dioxide’s oxidative effect.
Too many people have benefited from MMS to sweep it under the rug and act as though it has no merits simply because it is not backed by billions of dollars. The companies that do have those billions, gained them at the expense of the lives, livelihoods, and health of millions of people around the world. Government agencies, such as the FDA, exist to protect the well-being of the public. This is a fiduciary role that they serve, where the public trust is of utmost importance. However, they appear to be operating to protect the financial well-being of corporate entities.
And the public sees it clearly.
Healing the Gulf as Prelude to Paradigm Shift in Health Remediation
Albert Einstein has often been quoted as saying that you can’t solve a problem while thinking at the level of the problem. That statement has never been truer than in the present Gulf oil spill debacle. The problem is that BP, and its entire supporting infrastructure, which includes the petrochemical industry, various centers of academic influence (otherwise known as “leading universities”), and various branches of science, such as microbiology and engineering, have contributed to the current mess.
The current mess is that we have a high percentage of people who are used to seeing the problem as insurmountable, a conclusion supported by how ineffective known and accepted methods have been. They believe that they are right. Even though more effective solutions are available, current beliefs make for minds that are closed to “out of the box” thinking, which can easily be rationalized away by something as trivial as mere obscurity. If millions of research dollars haven’t been thrown at a “problem,” then the solution can’t be real, they tell themselves. Yet, hundreds of millions, even billions can be thrown at the Gulf of Mexico for remediation. However, unless it is toward an effective remediation method, it, and our planet will die.
I say this with a clear picture of an effective remediation method, so I am not painting a picture of gloom or doom. Indeed, when you gain a new perspective, things that were once fear inducing now look like grand opportunities.
Unaccustomed to seeing anything other than a chemical approach to remediation as effective (although it isn’t really), the vast majority of the people in BP’s employ have had a fairly narrow list of treatment options to choose from. This includes the academic and independent research communities, that have directed the thrust of their research toward nanotechnology, genomic studies, and other forms of patentable, expensive, untested, and not yet relevant pursuits.
The general thinking is that if this large body of “experts” haven’t embraced it, then it’s not viable. We now know that the best approaches often have little to do with the number of adherents. Ask the people, if they will talk to you, who have restored their health from such conditions as multiple sclerosis, diabetes, AIDS and cancer if they took the standard treatments. Those that I have either spoken to directly, or heard about, followed a course that would most likely be subject to question if not ridicule by mainstream health practitioners. Yet, the mainstream group continues to limit themselves to expensive patentable solutions, steering clear of natural, and therefore not patentable options.
Now, in the Gulf, we have the entire medical scenario being played out before our eyes, with the same issues facing those seeking to remediate the situation as it would with someone who came into a hospital with a clinical problem. Currently, the system has tried chemical dispersants – which would correspond with the allopathic medical approach – to address the oil, only to make the environment worse.
A natural, non-toxic method, referred to as bioremediation, has been presented to certain powers-that-be who realize what continuation along the current path could mean, not only to the Gulf, but to the world. Quietly they have gained the attention and interest at the state and Federal level. Expect to see some announcement of this soon. ANY method that demonstrates success at remediating the oil, in deep water, on beaches, and in coastal estuaries, is going to be noticed. No one will be able to dismiss it for lack of a double-blind study, or clinical trial. If Nature can’t fix this situation, it can’t be fixed. A plan that can work is in the offing. The jubilation that looms after the Gulf of Mexico is brought back to health is only the start.
The real conversation… about health remediation, can then begin.
Oil Remediation: A NON-TOXIC Approach
From here it still looks beautiful, but to marine life, it's deadly.
The Gulf oil spill of 2010 can become the latest biggest disaster in recent history, or our greatest blessing. We get to choose. Most writers, pundits, and commentators will tell you about the disaster and how bad it’s going to be. Here you’ll hear about the blessing. I’ll tell you now; if we follow the line of remediation that is being followed right now, the latest biggest disaster will be ours. Bigger ones will follow. However, if we choose a different path, which I firmly believe enough people actually want to do, then we’ll reap benefits that heretofore we’ve only dared to dream of privately.
Without going into a lot of detail here, I’m simply going to take this opportunity to introduce two men who, together, represent the kind of thinking, along with the products and services to back it up, that can truly turn the Gulf Oil disaster into a hiccup that did no lasting harm. In addition, their remediation strategy would not the waters in the Gulf of Mexico from becoming a dead zone, it would return it to its LIFE SUSTAINING state.
The men are Jerry Bakke, who runs Organic Miracle, Inc., of Muskogee, OK, and Joseph Johnson, Chief Operating Officer of ABC Organics, Inc., of Port Hueneme, CA. You’ve met Joseph before in two of my recent videos on the effects that PHOTONIC water (www.photonicwater.com) transformation technology has had on one of Joseph’s client strawberry fields. I also had Joseph as a guest on a recent episode of my radio show, Talk For Food. He represents the kind of inquisitive original thinking that is too often missing on our college campuses these days, which too often stress conformity over originality.
Jerry Bakke, owns a large parcel of mineral rich land in the Southwest United States, soon discovered that, when prepared a certain way and applied to diseased land, plants, or waters, dramatic improvements tended to happen. Imagine the quandary a citrus grower with diseased trees might have. Do you cut it down, or nurse it to health? That is, if you can find out what’s wrong. How much time and money does it take to turn things around, especially when we turn to chemicals to try to solve the problem. Bakke witnessed, time and time again, problems going away and health returning when his products were mixed with water and sprayed on the target. Worked like a miracle, so the name Organic Miracle seemed appropriate.
Enter the Gulf oil spill.
We’re loading a living sea with more chemicals, killing off miles upon miles of marine life, apparently oblivious to the effect that this devastation will have on humanity. One video on Fox Business is asking the question whether the Gulf oil spill will kill future oil drilling. When that is the extent and depth of one’s world view, the world is in jeopardy. Fortunately, theirs is only one perspective.
I sat down recently with both Jerry Bakke and Joseph Johnson and asked them about their collaboration. Below is a video beginning. There’s far more to be said on this subject, some from these gentlemen, and from others. But we’ve got to begin seeing the life sustaining solution as the only viable solution to sustain life. As “bright” as we think we’ve become, until life enhancement becomes our focus rather than damage control, we merit low grades in our studies in the school of life.
Jerry Bakke’s site is: www.buildingabetterworldgreen.com
More about the blessing will follow.
Photonic Water Video: Unintended Consequences of ‘Processed’ Water
Here is another segment of a conversation I had with Clayton Nolte about photonic water. I find that appreciation of the structured water difference is progressive; it doesn’t necessarily come all at once. Instead, it comes in inklings, which we might think of as faint “sparks” of truth.
‘Seeing the Light’ in Ourselves and in Structured Water
Our exploration into the nature and implications of structured water continues.
The efficacy and power of structured water will not always show up in standard water purity tests, where “normal” is based on particle counts. In fact, “purity” is not an appropriate measuring criterion for structured water. Balance is. Coherence is. When water is structured, it is balanced and coherent, with any elements that had contributed to its imbalance being transmuted to a zero-point state. Bio-photons are the transmuting agents that cause electrical bonds with distortion-causing elements within the water clusters to be released.
An element in water causes distortion when no vibrational reference or “match” exists in the DNA. Synthetic chemicals, such as aspartame, monosodium glutamate (MSG), and the many derivative chemicals that are spawned when pharmaceuticals are ingested, fall into this category.
Another distortion causing element in water is the result of the addition of chlorine (chlorination) and fluoride (fluoridation). While these two members of the halogen family of elements adversely affect health, the risks are considered acceptable versus the risk of ingesting other chemical pollutants that we routinely dump into our water supplies. Unfortunately, this strategy is flawed, because water’s behavior is based, not on molecular particles that are present, but on the vibrational signatures – the information – associated with said substances. It is the vibrational signatures of the substances that have been present, that cause electrical bonds to form to build water clusters. With intention being its catalyst, a structuring event releases light (bio-photons) that water, being living, conscious and intelligent, will respond to.
In the same way that transformative power is always available to the human being even if we are not consciously aware, bio-photons are always present in the water, though not always available. Fear is a factor that will dim a human’s light while “dumbing” the intelligence. It is a distorting and limiting influence upon perception. The vibrational residue of synthetics, along with the emotional and environmental stresses that the water has absorbed since its last “clearing” will diffuse, defract, and effectively mask the light within each cluster, and consequently, the life-giving energy that it would, by Original Intent and Design, otherwise pass to the consumer.
For these reasons, it is important to understand what that structured state is, and embrace it.
Structured water has nutritional value in the form of spectral and vibrational frequencies that trigger and support natural metabolic cellular functions, due to the presence of all active bands and available shades of light. These frequencies are undetectable by instruments whose primary design purpose is to view particles, because they are not in particle form. They exist as waveforms. Yet, they have an informational presence.
Structured water can be likened to a sunny day in liquid form.
“I’ll have a glass of sunny day please!”
It delivers a full spectrum of light, just like the sun, which contains frequencies for every mineral nutrient in the Periodic Table of Elements, all of which the body needs in specific amounts. The actual amounts of minerals that the body needs at any given moment are outlined and specified in the human DNA.
To appreciate the importance of spectral balance and sufficiency, please note that if we spend too much time in environments that are illuminated by light sources that are deficient in certain frequencies, such as fluorescent lights, we will eventually become deficient in certain mineral nutrients if they are not supplemented by other means. Structured water is one supplement. Himalayan salt lamps, is another. If structured water represents sunlight in a liquid form, Himalayan salt lamps represent sunlight in a solid form.
Humans are made of light. All that we see and experience in this world is the interplay of light, and the intention that it represents, in its many gradients of luminosity. Each discrete pulse of light, no matter what ray it may be native to, no matter how bright, or dim, is part of, and from a single source, from which all have emerged, and into which all will find a resonance.
That structured water makes a full spectrum of light more abundantly available, is significant because the organism, whether it is a human, animal, or plant, can use it in ways that are optimal to its present state or condition, and will do so naturally. It will derive from ingestion what it needs at that very moment to optimize its overall state of being.
There are practical and profound ways to ensure that the water we “consume”, by ingestion and immersion, have optimum amounts of energy available. The light is converted into that which meets the molecular needs of the consumer. Being free of spurious energetic signatures that could otherwise distort and/or nullify DNA instructions, structured water delivers the true benefits of hydration, which does not happen by mere ingestion, but requires water to be in its optimal state in order to deliver the intended result.
STRUCTURING DEVICES << Click the link to purchase a structuring unit.
HIMALAYAN SALT LAMPS << Click the link to purchase.
A Medium for Light
Cynthia Williams was a reluctant medium, which was not hard to imagine when you realize that the catalyst for what was eventually to become her life’s work was the unusual attention she received from, of all things, a dolphin.
I met Cynthia Williams at a small conference that was held at Angel Valley, a beautiful retreat located just west of Sedona, Arizona. This is the same Angel Valley that, one week later, got caught in the headlights of public attention when three people died at the end of a sweat lodge vision quest experience that was promoted and led by motivational speaker, James Arthur Ray.
Cynthia was one of the “speakers,” in this case she made herself available as a channel for celestial beings who do not have physical forms, a concept that could quickly gain one a place in the lunatic fringe a few years ago, but command much wider acceptance today.
The energies that she channels include The Universal Heart of Oneness, Dr. James M. Peebles (who serves as her gatekeeper), and The Dolphin Pod of One, which she describes as 13 Dolphin Masters who serve humanity with great wisdom, and other guides.
On the day that she presented, an amazing talk was given by Archangel Michael. I’d say it was amazing if it were done by her, but questions were asked about which Cynthia herself would not be expected to be familiar with, yet each was handled with ease, grace, love, and profundity.
The snippet below is a small part, in response to questions about structured water. Needless to say, I had to share.
I will say here that this video was rejected by YouTube, Yahoo Video, MySpace, MetaCafe, DailyMotion, and BlipTV.
This small snippet doesn’t even begin to convey the depth of the wisdom shared that day, but I couldn’t pass up the reference, and the inference that a celestial contribution to structured water in general, and Clayton Nolte’s device for creating a structuring event on in-home tap water, in particular.
LISTEN HERE
The next day I sat down with Cynthia as a guest on Talk For Food. You can listen to the podcast by clicking on the link.
Cynthia William’s web site is www.heardolphin.com.
PURCHASE
To get the Utopic Water structuring device, click the link above.
‘Connecting the Dots’ on Structured Water
My quest to understand and appreciate the nature, behavior, and essence of structured water is ongoing. Feedback from new structured water experiencers continues to stream in, and it is no less than amazing. Water plays a grossly unappreciated role in the human health matrix. Our failure to examine water, and to come to a consensus as to what constitutes the optimal form of intake, has resulted in the adoption of a number of plausible sounding, but ineffective substitutes. Worse still, many have convinced themselves that consuming anything “wet” will satisfy our water requirements. This is so not so.
Mother Nature is the first and best source of structured water. Water is best consumed when it is mature, in season, like ripened fruit. As outlined in Living Energies: An Exposition of the Concepts Related to the Theories of Viktor Schauberger, by Callum Coats, mature water is the result of passage through what is known as a full hydrological cycle. When it is immature, it is hungry, sometimes aggressive, even angry like many an adolescent. It is needy, and if drank, will require mineral resources from the body, in order to be put into use.
We’ve intervened in so many of our processes, not only in the way water is processed, but in the chemicals that are routinely dumped into rivers and tributaries, and the chemicals used in water treatment. Thinking that it is an inert substance, water is treated with little regard, even though life could not exist without it.
In order to have human health, the water that we intake needs to be (1) sufficient, (2) balanced, (3) cleared of its memory, and (4) energy rich. In other words, it must be structured. Water intake is generally regarded as drinking, but a significant percentage of the water we consume is through the surface of the skin, via showers and baths. 
The book, No More Secrets, No More Lies: a Handbook to Starseed Awakening, by Patricia Cori, contains some fascinating information on water, and its relationship to DNA.
Before we endeavor to describe the function of the ten dormant strands of your light-coded DNA and the process of their reactivation, we must give due thought and consideration to the consciousness of the water element within your bodies and its photo/phonic transmitting capacity.
Like the great waves in your oceans, your fluctuating body fluids affect your internal weather and climate-the body temperature, which regulates any number of functions determining the good health of your organism. Your water stores hydrate, cleanse and purify, oxygenate, enable complex chemical reactions, distribute nutrients, affect metabolic activity, detoxify, and play host to countless organisms… just as the great oceans of Gaia metabolize the abundant life within them.
The body water’s ultimate performance, however, is to serve as a highly conductive transmitting medium for the DNA, sending and receiving electromagnetic frequencies of sound and light that are constantly being communicated from the double helix highways to the cells, tissues, and organs of your bodies. Indeed, we read ninety percent of the water within you exists in relationship to the function of your DNA, primarily as a resonance factor for the communication of sound and light transmissions through the cells, between the cells, and everywhere in between.
From a metaphysical perspective, the water of your complex physical beings is the receptive element-the cosmic sea-upon which all etheric imprints of consciousness are stored and amplified, serving as a matrix upon which every conscious and subconscious thought is organized in resonant patterns that form the cosmometry of your persona. That persona, clearly, is the reflection of the greater whole, of which each of you is a unit of global and universal design.
Now the question arises regarding the consciousness of the waters within you, which (like your earthly seas) become polluted with dissonant thought patterns, invading acoustic and electromagnetic frequencies, toxic elements from your water and food supply, and every other aspect of discord that you create on the mental level and bring to manifestation in the realm of the physical. The essential water of your make-up reflects these disharmonies, and by nature of our discussion of the conductive properties of water, it is safe to deduce that these same disharmonies are then transmitted throughout the entire organism.
Similarly, water that has been raised to resonate at its highest levels of consciousness, enhanced by your intention, water that has been purified with sound and light before you introduce it into the body seas… water that has been thanked, loved, and appreciated will effectively communicate that higher dimensionality throughout the body.
I will share more from this book, but this is a good place to introduce the fourth installment of the Structured Water 111 video series.
The Photonic Water structuring device is available here.
More to come…
Diary of an Amputation
Not the Disease, the Treatment
Golden Years Interrupted
I’ve been in sort of an “in-between” state lately, wanting to write and wanting to video, but not doing enough of either to suit me. There’s been an ongoing story of my step-father, Josh, who had a stroke in 2007 and, two years later, is progressing in the best way that predominant medical practice can offer. That is, his condition has progressively worsened.
He has had physical therapy.
He has been given prescriptions, among them, a “blood thinner” (Coumadin, Plavix is another), ostensibly to assist blood circulation and prevention (?) of strokes. I called attention to the term blood thinner because Coumadin in particular, as many people know, was originally developed as a rat poison.
I’m not making this up. (See Coumadin in Wikipedia.) The drug is presented very matter-of-factly in the description as an anticoagulant. Sounds pretty okay that way doesn’t it? Yet, it is a toxic product that has gained FDA approval for human application by doctors when law enforcement would prosecute anyone who would try giving it to another human for attempted murder. Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO), on the other hand, which could safely, and without toxicity, dissolve the plaque, does not enjoy FDA approval. Individuals who know what DMSO does must go to feed stores to purchase it, as it is approved to rub down a horse, but not to save a human life.
The difference between an overt killing with rat poison by an individual and a subtle one via medical treatment, is dosage. No matter what you call it, Coumadin is still rat poison, and it still kills. EXCEPT when you say it was used to “fight” diabetes. Then it’s therapy, approved Medical Standard of Care. When the patient loses body parts, the therapy isn’t at fault. The disease gets the blame.
Over time, Josh’s kidneys began to fail. He was put on dialysis. When I went home in August 2008, he struggled to communicate, actually breaking down into tears on a couple occasions when he couldn’t simply say what was on his mind. It became clear to me that he was lucid as ever, even though now “handicapped” by an unresponsive body.
By the time I returned home this past September, all the signs of handicapped living had set in. He had not one, but two motorized scooters to get around in. One had been owned by John, a long time friend, himself a 6′ 5″ police officer who lived his final few years virtually immobile and bloated, like a beached whale, attributed to the effects of diabetes. Josh was the beneficiary of the scooter after John’s death. Ramps had been built for ingress and egress to the house, and life was punctuated by trips to the hospital, schedule and unscheduled, for various examinations and procedures, or for medical emergencies.
The bill for all this continued to mount. One day on a phone conversation Mom told me that just one of their hospital stays generated a bill for $223,000. If that wasn’t enough, it hadn’t been their first $200,000+ bill. Health insurance paid these bills, which included $323 for a “consulting” physician to appear one day while Josh was in the hospital, stick his head in the room and say “hello.”
There are many natural, non-toxic approaches that could have helped Josh, including structured water (hydration and waste removal), magnesium replenishment, MMS (to reduce pathogen/anaerobic overgrowth), DMSO (dissolve plaque), living clay (pathogen reduction), nutritional supplementation. The goal wouldn’t be to treat a “disease,” but to bring Josh’s body back into balance. There’s nothing more important to health than balance. It’s so important that it has its own term, homeostasis. Yet, when one has been tagged as having a “disease,” balance is not a medical priority, and Medical Standard of Care practices tend to take the patient further out of balance.
Medicine holds out the hope of “fixing” people without the person having to change anything. This is a pipe dream. For chronic conditions, such as diabetes and cancer, Standard medical practices don’t take measures to improve critical balance. Instead, they take the body further out of kilter, and when it can’t take any more, they cut the now “dead” part off, and continue the toxic medication.
So it wasn’t exactly a surprise when I got a voice message from my brother saying that Mom had taken Josh to the hospital again, and this time he was scheduled for surgery, to have both of his legs amputated, just above the knee. No surprise, but still a tough pill to take, for Josh who had to lose his legs, for Mom who has helplessly stood by while her husband has been medically taken away, when the hope was that medicine might restore him. This is a false hope that is cultivated by media admonishments to “ask our doctors,” pandemic scares, vaccine campaigns, and debates on health care. It is further supported by our passive turning to GMO foods, chemicalized water sources, electro-pollution, and “mass market” farming approaches.
I’m not against the medical establishment. I am against medical practices that don’t help people to heal. I’m against not taking a critical look at the effectiveness (or lack thereof), of medical procedures, particularly in light of proven safe, inexpensive, and effective modalities that are available. I’m also against the blinders that the medical industry applies to anything that is not pharmaceutical and surgical. That industry includes the AMA, medical schools, hospitals, insurance companies, and the various associations that have raised billions of dollars in “research” but ignores already found cures.
I wanted to write about this a few days ago, but the words just didn’t come through. Now they have, but not until after I recorded my thoughts on camera. Here they are.
I shared further thoughts in this week’s Talk For Food, before my conversation with Clayton Nolte on negative ions.
Feedback