In His Own Words: The Chlorite Matrix
[The following article on the Chlorite Matrix was written and published in July 2011 by Grant Maanum in a blog he titled, The Chlorite Matrix. Unfortunately, few people noticed, or appreciated the significance of this information. One time is not nearly enough, as the subject must be examined from many angles and points of context. With his permission I am republishing the article here, with a few new images and comments.]
Sodium Chlorite, Citric Acid, and Calcium Hypochlorite. The New Reality…
The issue of the Krebs Cycle (1943) is front and center when regarding any health issue whatsoever, and that “cycle” determines the functionality of each individual cell in our body .
The modern term is “Citric Acid Cycle”, and the importance of that citric acid is prioritized. There are complex events taking place within all cells due to the ongoing actions of that cycle, but the important part is the production and discharge of the energies which “fire” the various “Voltage-Gated Ion Channels” contained within each.
To see an animation of the channels in action and the flow of ions both into, and outside the cell, follow this link.
In order for the Citric Acid Cycle to function correctly, diet must include all or most food groups. The intake of natural source Potassium is critical. Given our cultural obsession with chemical additives, you can see the increasing difficulty in maintaining or restoring conditions required by our very nature for the human body’s health.
There are different strengths and different speeds of energies coming from different Element decays, and there also are “sub units” of energies produced.
These energy discharges do not occur by happenstance; they are part of the Natural Human Design.-AA
The energy discharge created by the specific decay rates of the elements involved, is actually aimed at the specific voltage gated channel that it passes through.
Please appreciate the Intelligence and singular intent that orders these complex operations. Then consider the arrogant intent that results in mucking them up. The good news is that what has been put asunder, can be restored to order. A body that has been orchestrated and manipulated into ill-health, can be healthy once again. -AA
The Channels, such as the Potassium channels, the Chlorine channels, and the Calcium Channels are targeted due to designed “Communication” between the energy source, and the energy “target” at the channel’s opening. The targets are smears of Amino Acid.
Of the 22 standard amino acids, 20 are coded, in essence, “written,” by the universal genetic code. Want to change the message? Change the amino acids. Inadvertently change the amino acids, change the health. Intentionally change the amino acids, destroy the health. Restore the standard amino acids specified within the genetic code, restore the health.
Eight of those twenty-two amino acids are essential to human life, and can ONLY be taken in through proper diet. Most important to this discussion, are the 5 positive or negative electrically charged amino acids, and that it is known that the “Alpha” amino acids communicate with Beta- Decay Energy sources.
Considering the energy, sodium decay produces ~20% of the energy produced by Potassium decay in paired discharge, then Potassium produces five fold that energy, in paired discharge. The Potassium decay is VERY powerful, and will “jump-start” the impaired or dormant voltage gated channel.
This is where the Chlorite Matrix enters.
Molecule size must be small for these processes to work.
The “Chlorite Matrix” is a solution made with Sodium Chlorite, and usually Citric Acid. Other acid, such as Acetic, Lactic, Humic, and Ascorbic can be substituted.
The use of Lactic Acid is “specifically directed” to the production of “Beta- propane” or Acetone. That issue will come later. Per my research involving Sodium Chlorite/Citric Acid (or Acetic Acid) produced ClO2 Emission Spectroscopy, the only difference produced by using different acid reagents, is the total time of “survival moment” of the Chlorine Dioxide molecule which was produced by the Sodium Chlorite/Citric Acid reaction. The breakup of the Chlorine Dioxide molecule is important.
IMPORTANT
In order for the Chlorite Matrix to produce the expected results, the Sodium Chlorite MUST BE Sodium CHLORITE, and the Citric Acid MUST BE PURE and from a NATURAL SOURCE.
The water used MUST NOT BE OZONATED. NO OZONE. The water MUST NOT contain anything which may react with Chlorine, producing Organochlorines. Later, i will provide the latest science regarding the Genotoxicity of ozone treated water, but start with this.
Google… “Possible Involvement of Oxidative Stress in Potassium Bromate-induced Genotoxicity in Human HepG2 Cells.”
Potassium Bromate (KBrO3,PB) is a byproduct of Ozone used as Disinfectant in Drinking Water….
There are several versions of the Chlorite Matrix which are well-known. Beginning with the earliest (1984) published work (so far), the Sarin et al work with his chlorite matrix is continually referred to by Authors of related papers, and that Chlorite Matrix invention is now protected by Dr. Friedrich W. Kuhne of OXO CHEMIE AG, Switzerland.
That evidence exists within the Patentstorm registered 6086922 “WF10″ chlorite matrix based compound’s four patents. I recommend that you search Sarin et al Chlorite Matrix, and read it five times. Print it out. Pass it out. Mag it to your fridge.
Abstract of Patent 6086922
Within that international patent, there are the results regarding the use of that Chlorite Matrix based WF10 in HUMAN TRIALS is there. The science is well represented, and the results are clearly stated. The WF10, administered by injection, successfully “cured/ended” the HIV/AIDS issue with regard to the four HIV/AIDS infected volunteers. The numbers regarding the return of T cell, NK cells, and ATP production are stated, along with the 9-week long WF10 administration process that was required.
MMS: No Desire for Drama, Just Beneficial Results
It would be impossible to convey, even in a few thousand words, the profound shift that has occurred in my thinking as a result of ongoing interactions with Grant Maanum. Our conversations haven’t been limited to matters of MMS in the least. However, the importance of what MMS can do for humanity is so great that it behooves us to take a critical look at any measure that could possibly compromise it, even before getting to the main issue at hand, which is the multifaceted disintegration of the Human DNA at the hands of an unwitting orthodox science through its promulgation of the HeLa cell and derivative technologies.
In the process of discovering this threat, and because of it, Grant has invested quite a bit of time and energy to help people better understand, and hence get the best results from their MMS use with no economic motive or compensation whatsoever. He has done so, not by attempting to establish himself as the new arbiter of methods, but to call the public’s attention to a clinically proven and scientifically confirmed approach that could act as a reliable, science-based baseline. That has not been an easy task. But then, I can think of few worthwhile tasks where the term “easy” applies.
We have discussed the matter of adding baking soda to MMS. More thoughts have been recorded. A question as to the chemical efficacy of the new Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS) protocol developed by Andreas Kalcker has also been raised, though not commented on here as of yet. I’m not here to judge anyone. I simply want the products that people take to actually give them what they are seeking, secure in the knowledge that we’ve dotted every “I” and crossed every “t”. Chemically speaking, there is a difference between chlorine dioxide and its ionic counterpart that we need to know and understand. This is not a commercial application, but for a living biological system.
In each of these approaches, “successes” have been observed and reported. However, true success means being able to answer what can sometimes be a long list of questions in a satisfactory manner. Thanks to Grant I am beginning to see new questions to ask, based on his 10+ years of study. The town where he lives is one of the largest producers of industrial chlorine dioxide in the world. He has experienced, first hand, both the harmful effects of chlorine dioxide (ClO2) toxicity and the curative/restorative effects of the chlorite matrix (ClO2-).
Most people are unaware that there is a difference within the chemical species that is chlorine dioxide. I certainly didn’t know it. Most are unaware that much of the curative activity that needs to happen when a metabolic dysfunction turns into a full-blown disease, occurs within the cell. My view of chlorine dioxide was as a cluster of oxygen-equipped warriors that entered the body and destroyed the low voltage, anaerobic overgrowth that they encountered by commandeering up to five electrons from their microscopic-sized “enemies.”
Now, intracellular environments, requirements, and dynamics must be considered, as well as the extracellular, and in spite of the many detractors against MMS who call it “bleach”, the chlorine ion (Cl-) is of critical importance to the proper inner workings of every cell. Specially in the presence of, but not limited to, the chlorite matrix (ClO2-).
Why is this important?
The importance in all this is in the fact that the chlorite matrix (ClO2-) is a vital and necessary ingredient in the proper functioning of the Krebs Cycle, which is routinely compromised by the preponderance of nutrient deficient and chemically processed products that we consume or are exposed to. Just take a shower each day and you prove my point. Vaccines, genetic engineering, fracking, “smart meters,” and many other “technological advancements” exacerbate an already dicey situation, health-wise. In MMS, as originally formulated, Jim Humble gave us a way to economically produce the chlorite matrix (ClO2-). However, we – or at least I have thought that chlorine dioxide (ClO2) was the same thing.
According to the Cornford, Frost, Herring & McDowell (1971) work, ClO2 is produced when you add acid – they used acetic, but it works with citric, lactic, ascorbic, and humic acids too. The chlorine dioxide, which normally lasts 300,000 years due to its very tight bonding, was broken up in an instant by the acid, which essentially removed the “radical” character of the molecule, leaving the part that can repair and heal; the chlorite matrix (ClO2-).
Here’s more about chlorine dioxide, from the EPA’s Guidance Manual, dated April 1999:
Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) is a neutral compound of chlorine in the +IV oxidation state. It disinfects by oxidation; however, it does not chlorinate. It is a relatively small, volatile, and highly energetic molecule, and a free radical even while in dilute aqueous solutions. At high concentrations, it reacts violently with reducing agents. However, it is stable in dilute solution in a closed container in the absence of light (AWWA, 1990).* Chlorine dioxide functions as a highly selective oxidant due to its unique, one-electron transfer mechanism where it is reduced to chlorite (ClO2-) (Hoehn et al., 1996).
The pKa for the chlorite ion, chlorous acid equilibrium, is extremely low at pH 1.8. This is remarkably different from the hypochlorous acid/hypochlorite base ion pair equilibrium found near neutrality, and indicates the chlorite ion will exist as the dominant species in drinking water. The oxidation reduction of some key reactions are (CRC, 1990):
*This chlorine dioxide was produced by interacting sodium chlorate (NaClO3) and the very harsh sulfuric acid.
Notice that chlorite is acknowledged as its own distinct identity, described chemically as “ClO2-.” Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) becomes chlorite (ClO2-) via “reduction” with a specific form of acid when applied to a 28% Sodium Chlorite (NaClO2-) solution. The acid does two things:
- separates the chlorine dioxide (ClO2) from the sodium (Na)
- reduces it to chlorite (ClO2-)
If there is absolutely NO sodium chlorate (NaClO3-) present in your source material, then you’re good to go. If there is, then chlorine dioxide will be present too.
The documents like the one excerpted from the EPA, which lays out ground rules for various methods of municipal water treatment may go the way of the dinosaur, as critical information, such as how sodium chlorate must not be present, is coming up missing. It has happened before, as “history” is constantly being revised.
I’ve examined Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for 80% sodium chlorite that MMS producers use. In remaining approximately 20%, sodium chloride (NaCl or salt), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) are present in varying percentages. I found small amounts of sodium chlorate (NaClO3) from one Asian source. NO amount of sodium chlorate is ever acceptable.
The Cornford tests were performed with 99% pure sodium chlorite. Barring that, the sodium chlorite that the producer uses to produce MMS must contain NO sodium chlorate.
In order to begin to explain differences that some people have reported – specifically related to extreme reactions – a standard must be understood to exist among MMS producers, even to the point of ensuring that their source sodium chlorite is of such a quality as to have NO sodium chlorate. This helps eliminate questions down the road.
One of the MMS suppliers in Europe, not knowing this, sent me his ingredient list because he wanted to know. It contained the following:
- Cloratos = Chlorate = Sodium Chlorate.
- NaClO = Sodium Chlorite.
- NaOH = Sodium Hydroxide.
- NaCl = Sodium Chloride
- Na2CO3 = Sodium Carbonate.
I sent it to Grant, who responded with the following analysis:
Yes, Sodium Chlorate is present, less than 8 g/L, and reacted produces ClO2.
NaOH is sodium hydroxide. We call it Lye.
NaOH will react with the citric acid, and because of being a strong base, the monosodium, disodium, and trisodium will fall away. The monosodium is then available to form MSG.
Na2CO3 is Sodium Carbonate, which produced exactly the same issues as sodium Bicarbonate when reacted. In fact, the chemical equation is EXACTLY the same.
So you may be getting a feel for how complex this is. With regard to the production, preparation, therapeutic and/or clinical use of chlorite (ClO2-), standards are needed among and within the MMS community that cover everything from material’s, product production standards and practices, to metabolic assumptions and outcomes. Perhaps it’s being done already, but there appears to be room for improvement.
New Context vs. the FDA Warning on MMS
If the conventions and controls recommended above are considered, observed and confirmed, this awareness would take the “danger” out of the FDA warning, which sounded an alarm about the production and consumption of chlorine dioxide. The FDA warning focused on chlorine dioxide because all the literature and presentations, mine included, said that this is what was being produced and getting the results. That was my best understanding of what I read and experienced. The amazing improvements that so many people have reported, along with Jim’s instruction and corroborating information I found, was good enough for me.
Grant’s discovery of the Cornford, et. al tests presented a plausible and documented alternative story about what was going on. Their emission spectroscopy results confirmed that no chlorine dioxide was present once the acetic acid activator was applied. Chlorine dioxide had been released for an instant, leaving chlorite behind in a stabilized form. The chlorite is safe, non-toxic, and therapeutic, and vital to the Krebs Cycle. It also destroys HeLa cells. This may not mean much to you now, but it will, once you know what HeLa cells are doing.
Chlorine dioxide cannot and will not help intracellular function. The chlorite ion is required for proper cell function. Oxo Chemie’s WF10 trials showed complete restoration of T-cell production and cell function in four patients who had advanced stages of HIV/AIDS, after a very specific program that spanned 9-weeks. All five of the listed acids are not required to achieve similar effects. However, I am acknowledging what has proven to worked before, proven scientifically, and will let it be my foundation for moving forward.
The effort to establish this bit of common ground regarding the productive use of MMS allows us to deal with real value that it represents, when properly prepared and administered; in its ability to destroy HeLa cells and the damage that they have been, and are doing to human DNA.
Baking Soda-Gate, Part II
I am pleased to report that the YouTube video with Jim Humble showing how to add baking soda to MMS to make it taste palatable has been removed. However, a second copy of the same video is still online, which was posted by someone else on June 17, 2012.
That’s the simple part.
Yesterday I received email replies from both Jim Humble and Dr. Ron Neer, the gentleman seated with him in the video. I wrote to Jim privately and asked him to take the video down and recant the advice regarding using baking soda to abate the taste. In informing me that they removed the video, Jim’s letter suggested it was in spite of my urging, rather than because of it. He went on to correct what he saw as errors in our reasoning. Given the limited exposure that both of them have had to anything we’ve said on this subject compared to what they have done, their responses and skepticism are reasonable, and to be expected. So while I have my own opinions about what each says, I am going to publish them both, without editing, rebuttal, or comment.
Not knowing the basis of the suggestion to not use baking soda with one’s MMS intake, it’s also easy for both of them to assume that neither “my source” nor I have “the full picture.” Fortunately for us, we don’t assume that we do. However, we have an element of, as well as a perspective on “the picture” that few have even considered, referring to the HeLa cell, which is affecting everyone, and needs to be known, acknowledged, and dealt with, else the infecting injecting of humankind will continue with our permission.
Perhaps this is the beginning.
Before we get on to the responses, I have also recorded two more conversations with Grant (the latest one lasting 2-hours this morning), specifically on points made in Dr. Neer’s and Jim Humble’s emails below. In the process I gained a better understanding of the power of the chlorite species and the distinction between chlorine dioxide (ClO2) and the chlorite matrix (ClO2-).
This was brought out in research done in 1971 by Cornford, Herring, Frost & McDowell, of the University of British Columbia, as they explored the chemical nature of Dichloroacetate (DCA), which itself was first proven in clinical practice in London, 1936.
MMS could be considered a grandchild or analog of DCA, as both compounds involve the detoxification of sodium chlorite (ClO2-), with a light acid. Not just any light acid, but research has shown that detoxification is achieved with any one from the list below:
- acetic
- ascorbic
- humic
- citric
- lactic
In the Cornford tests, 10% acetic acid (1 part acetic acid to 9 parts distilled water) was applied in a distilled water solution which was forced through a high-speed jet, like a car wash sprayer, to mix with a 28% solution of 99.9% pure sodium chlorite (NaClO2) under equal pressure at a 45% angles to each other.
High-speed “mixing” of sodium chorite and acetic acid.
The above image provides a visual impression of the electron spectroscopy tests that were run.
It is possible that each acid has its own area of effectiveness, which may be why Oxo Chemie’s WF10 used all five on its HIV/AIDS trails. The original attacks on DCA were likewise based on the assumption that chlorine dioxide was being produced. The case against this assumption was proven by Cornford, Herring, et. al, but was not publicized.
The Chlorite Matrix (ion) with the minus sign.
I will comment on the replies below after I finish producing the first of our conversations on the chemical ramifications of adding baking soda to MMS. Takes much more time when there is no image to work from, but I’m getting through it.
I debated whether I should just send the audio as it is, but have decided against doing so because the HeLa cell factors in to this equation as an issue that few, even in the medical industry, are aware, or think is problematic. It is, in my opinion, a greater problem for humanity than our present debt crisis. For reasons that will unfold, it is critically important that if a person takes MMS, they actually get what MMS can do for them.
Grant has been very clear that the way Jim originally formulated MMS, which he believes had no sodium chlorate involved, would be perfectly safe because it follows the example set by both DCA and WF10. The 1971 work of Cornford Frost Herring, & McDowell proved the non-toxicity of the chlorite matrix through emission spectroscopy which showed that the chlorine dioxide species (ClO2-) was formed, but disappeared in less than 1/3 of a second. This is in stark contrast to the 300,000 year life of chlorine dioxide (ClO2).
As such, I am adding visual information to support the audio, so as to help the listener/viewer better appreciate the authenticity and weight of the problem, and the context and importance of effective solutions, which includes, but is not limited to, properly administered MMS and DMSO.
While I finish preparing the video, here is a short selection from today’s conversation, discussing three specific points:
- the research that supports these recommendations, which go back to 1971,
- the HeLa cell, and
- the chemical effects of adding baking soda.
Here is Jim Humble’s response:
Adam,
It would have been nice if you guys had checked with me before starting to throw things on the internet indiscriminately before knowing what you are talking about. Luckily you got enough stuff right that it isn’t all wrong.
I have been going to take Ron’s stuff off of Utube and anywhere else for some time, just now got around to it.
Your logic is flawed in a number of places. Fortunately that does not make you completely wrong and the same with your “Source that you trust.”
The first point is where you say that MMS sodium chlorite puts oxygen into the system. Well that is totally incorrect. MMS brings no oxygen to the system what-so-ever. When the chlorine dioxide molecule destroys a molecule it is itself destroyed. The two oxygen atoms that are released are released as carbon dioxide. Oxygen atoms, yes, but they have no power as oxygen. The reason that the chlorine dioxide ion kills pathogens is because it is positively charged and it attracts the negative electrons of the pathogen. Electrons are what hold the parts of the pathogen together. Namely the outer layer of the pathogen.
Only chlorine dioxide ion does the killing, because it is the only thing that can. When in water the chlorine dioxide ion returns to the chlorite condition only part of the chlorine dioxide ions return to this condition and the chlorite cannot kill the pathogens.
What you and your source are looking at is the chemical explanation of what happens and you are grabbing on to points in the reaction that only last 1 millisecond or so and thinking that is where it all ends.The chlorite cannot kill a pathogen. When the pH is brought down under 9 or so the chlorite deteriorates into chlorine dioxide and that is what kills the pathogens.
Don’t go to google to find your answers. Google answers are mostly college chemistry which isn’t wrong, but you got to know how to apply it to actual commercial operations and your source hasn’t yet understood it. He might be good, but I doubt that he needs to tell me I should get my shit together.
Let me suggest that you both go to Lenntech. That is a company that has been using chlorine dioxide for many years commercially and they have the technology pretty well explained. Once you have learned what chlorine dioxide is and how it works to really do the work then come back and correct me but don’t put a bunch of crap on the internet. Go ahead and say don’t use sodium carbonate. We have not been using it for some time. But don’t tell anyone that chlorine dioxide is chlorine or that chlorine dioxide does not kill pathogens, because of all that chemistry, it is the only thing that does and it is destroyed in the process being changed to chloride. No useable oxygen is ever added to the body.
And then please tell me how adding 18 mg chlorine dioxide along with 10 mg of sodium carbonate can produce many grams of carbon dioxide in the body. Your trusted source isn’t making sense yet.
Lenntech has written it up and explained the chemistry pretty well and so have a number of other commercial companies. They are light years ahead of Google Chemistry Answers and even the Universities.
Please don’t be like all the rest of the critics. Just start talking before you have a clue and please tell your trusted source the same thing. A dose of MMS IS 3 DROPS. That is a total of 18 mg of chlorine dioxide. The amount of sodium carbonate was less than 10 mg for that one dose. Then to say it doesn’t matter how little sodium carbonate is used. That in itself is crazy as amounts do matter.
So anyway if you guys are going to write it up please get it right before just writing and go over all the details before you say that chlorine dioxide never does the job as it is the only thing that does do the job, and in hundreds of places in hundreds of water supplies throughout the world, and if sodium carbonate was the terrible thing that the trusted source says, we have thousands of people using it and no problems reported.
Still we have found that using sodium chlorite to bring the pH back up when needed works best. I have just been working with the worst cancer you ever saw and I used CDI which uses sodium chlorite to bring up the pH. And if your trusted source is going to come up with ideas about using sodium chlorite to bring up the pH he will compete with a couple of universities in Spain who have used it extensively in the past 6 months.
Adam, my suggestion is you read the technology on Lenntech carefully before writing another article and that you either take this last article down or you change it. Don’t just make me wrong. Your are supposed to be a trusted friend. Friends don’t just start writing stuff about friends without at least talking to them first.
Jim Humble
Now, Dr. Neer’s letter:
Adam
hope all is well in your world
we have tested the formulation with baking soda very much so prior to suggesting it to people.
There is no msg or co2 formed when you add baking soda to it. There also is no balanced equation that would show anything otherwise.
Jims mixture has more acid in it then is required to activate the mms. so there is excess acid in it. This is called stoichiometrically imbalanced. as excess acid contributes to diarrhea and throat burn and bad taste we calculated what little bit of bicarb would be needed to get rid of the excess unused acid.
Also the original mixture of mms left of ph of 2.5 to 3 making it hard for people to handle therefore many people stop taking mms. our ph is around 5 and helps be more receptive to the stomach and throat.
our attempts to help people not give up on mms and continue were the basis for the small addition of bicarb.
turns out many hundreds of people have reported back to us with great testimonies and can once again continue to take mms otherwise they would not.
the mixture of mms has chlorous acid, chlorite and chlorine dioxide in it.the chlorine dioxide test strips are precalibrated to test specifically for that. you eliminate false tests by adding some glycerin per instructions then the reading is solely chlorine dioxide.
this is what turns mixture yellow, what gives it the odor and is a well known action.
the reaction is somewhat confusing but we understand the chemistry along with the help of some of our Ph D friends and other experts working in the chlorine dioxide field. this team of experts has much knowledge to help those whom really want the truth and want to help mankind. One of the original doctors whom helped jim write his book have even tested and approved our bicarb addition.
chlorite appears to be the carrier but it is the chlorine dioxide that is the agent used to kill when needed.
chlorite itself can do pretty good by itself but even the smallest of activation helps it to be even better.here is other research from other great knowledgeable folks whom have very similar views.
http://www.health-science-spirit.com/MMSaction.htm
you and grant are welcome to contact us anytime and we are happy to help folks better understand the believed truth behind the chemistry of mms. I am also available to go on the radio with you at anytime to help educate people. We want to help people get well.
the bicarb will NOT hurt anyone and frankly is vital so people do not quit as most people simply can not take it the other way. The testimonies speak volumes.
dr ron
Nuff said… for now.
Healthcare: Different When It’s ‘Money-Driven’
It rarely crosses our mind, but it should be noted that what we refer to as “the healthcare industry” is a collection of money-driven business entities. Just that statement alone gives reason to pause, because it includes both “for profit” and “not-for-profit” organizations. The not-for-profits can lay claim to some noble purpose, but they are still very much for the money. “Dead president promissory notes” remain their chief deity.
Health, on the other hand, is a province and state of living beings. Holding the word “health” in common with the collective of corporate entities that is the healthcare system doesn’t mean that its methods, standards, and practices are intended to help maintain or restore the human state of health. Business health is not measured in quality of life, but quantity of dollars relative to costs. Quality of life and health, are non-factors. Instead, the appearance of life and movement toward health, are prime.
When money is the chief focus, health may result from one’s activities. However, when a person becomes ill, health is likely to return faster if nature and balance are allowed to take its course. As such, an undeclared War on Nature has been raging all around us and against us for several generations that we have all but failed to notice. The healthcare industry is so into “the war,” they’ve all but ignored the restorative power of balance.
I am not against money. There should be a fair exchange and mutual benefit when energies are engaged, either as producers or consumers. However, objectives must also be singular and clear. When a person gets sick and seeks the knowledge and services of a doctor, the patient’s objective is to restore the state of health. The doctor may want to do likewise, however, the guidance indicated by his education, professional association, and industry, actually interfere with health’s restoration, or make the disease condition worse.
An Unholy ‘Dance’ with Vaccines
It’s raining needles…
To see such policies in action, we need only look at how vaccines are now routinely given to people for diseases they’ve not had, particularly children, on the presumption that they’ll get it. Then when some people do demonstrate the pathology, medical officials tell themselves (and us) that they need to inoculate more people, never questioning whether the chemicals in the vaccines had anything to do with the disease’s onset.
Vaccine pushers carefully word their press releases, advising consumers that there is still no guarantee that they won’t contract the condition that the vaccine is designed to “protect” against. Yet, in addition to not getting your money back, many people lose their health and never get it back. If the patient objects, practitioners are quick to question, or even challenge an individual’s judgment, particularly parents for their children, if they have the audacity to say “no, thank you” to the doctor’s kind protection offer.
If you take current vaccine thinking to its present “logical” conclusion, there would be a vaccine for every disease known to man. Why? Because diseases are idea constructs that are created by money-driven men. “Restless leg syndrome” is an example of such an idea construct. They are mutual thinking points, morphic fields that are used by all parties to the condition.
The perfect money-maker in the medical world would be to have “approved” medications for every known disease. It would even be more perfect to force the public into “patienthood” by way of policies, statutes, and laws, to involuntarily take the medications without ever having the disease, and then claim credit for preventing them.
If some people get the diseases anyway, such as for HPV, for which Gardasil® was developed, the industry and its practitioners are still protected because they told us it wasn’t a guarantee, The spate of new diseases that evolve are viewed as reason to initiate new money-raising and research activities. They are not presumed to have anything to do with the existing medications that have become part of “normal” business.
The money motive is always present, but never admitted to, especially by $cientific researchers. This was very obvious in A Conspiracy of Cells: One Woman’s Immortal Legacy and the Medical Scandal it Caused, by Michael Gold (1986 SUNY Press). The book chronicles the discovery that some mysterious agent was changing the identity of human cell line specimens that are used — bought and sold — by the cancer research community. A prostate cancer research scientist needs “live” human prostate cancer specimens in order to observe and determine what the new drug she’s developing will do. In order for her research findings to be considered valid — according to scientific method — the specimens must be representative of the target tissue. In other words, findings made on a prostate cancer drug must be done on prostate cancer cell cultures. The value of the researcher’s findings would be lost if it turned out that the tissue samples she worked on were from lung cancer tumors.
It turns out that this is the kind of “identify change” that the HeLa cell was and is causing, in addition to adding race and gender markers that were associated with Henrietta Lacks, the woman whose cervical cancer tumor specimen is associated with the first discovery of the HeLa… or so the story presently goes.
My point in all this is that the discovery of HeLa contamination didn’t result in a unanimous, conscientious push by medical researchers to remove any question of specimen integrity. Instead, they were annoyed at Walter Nelson-Rees for bringing the matter to the profession’s attention and calling for stricter tissue integrity protection methods.
Over thirty years after the original problem was discovered, which had been at least twenty years after the HeLa cell had been introduced, the problem yet exists today. (See linked article.) If healing were the true objective of the researchers, then it would have been important to ensure that the specimens they used were right. But when it’s about money, or professional stature, which is still about the ability to charge money, then it’s another story. It’s the story that we have today.
Political types have cultivated the mindset that the healthcare system should “protect” every citizen, to the extent that legislation has been enacted that seeks to coerce, or even force the individual into the healthcare system, so as to “pay their fair share.” Note the money dominance in the thinking. However, the healthcare system’s Prime Directive is unchanged. We must still show them the money! And a lot of it! They don’t have to show us the health, and they’re not. We’re so used to them not showing us the health, we’ve stopped looking for it, with their encouragement.
Since we don’t think of these things that often, what with the NFL football season, American Idol, House, and Big Brother all gearing up once again, it is useful to consider that the Healthcare Industry needs us more than we need it. Even more so, it needs us to be sick. Sickness is good for the healthcare business.
Current healthcare practices have, for over 300 years, been guided by the money motive. This includes the materials and procedures that were selected. The decision, which goes back to Edward Jenner in the early 1800’s, to suggest that cowpox could be used as a plausible substitute for human smallpox made it more practical to offer smallpox response in a money-making organization. Using cowpox made it possible to actually stock up on raw material to produce the vaccines. Human smallpox was only available when people had smallpox. Not nearly as reliable a resource, business-wise.
Eighteen pence was established as the minimum that a vaccination officer would charge for the procedure in 19th Century London. Scaring the skin was a visible way to distinguish who had, and had not received the treatment, and more importantly, who had paid the price. All of this was instituted because the ability to make money was present, even though the method did not, in truth, eradicate smallpox, as had been speculated.
As a society, we remain more concerned about money than we are about the state of health of our bodies, and of our relationships with others. We continue to judge and compare others, as well as ourselves, by “what we have” versus what exists in our heart. Why? Perhaps because the heart can’t be regulated, nor can anyone else be an “expert” over what drives it, and as a result, what drives you.
Therefore, it is deemed better to set aside the heart and get your money affairs and values in order, which generally involves setting common sense, conscience, and even our humanity aside. What we get in exchange is insanity, heartlessness, and inhumanity, presented in white coats and three-piece suits.
Better than condemn the system for being the great evil force in our world, how about simply realizing how it was done; that is, by lateral power transfer, from many to a few. Each who walks his path in self-harmony, increases his own health and reduces the potential of harm, both within the body and beyond.
There’s no better time in history to live by these precepts, than now.
What NOT to do with MMS
First trip to see Jim in Hermosillo, Mexico (2007) to shoot my documentary.
If you are familiar with the product known as “MMS,” the sodium chlorite solution that was introduced and popularized by Jim Humble, it’s possible you’ve stumbled upon something that I’ve written or produced about the product since my first introduction to it in 2007. In some respects I have helped the public’s acceptance and understanding of the product through the many articles, interviews, and video documentaries that I’ve done. As such, while I choose not to be part of, or party to Jim’s health ministry network, my appreciation for the significance of what MMS means to humanity has grown, and my regard for its chief ambassador is the highest.
Much of my special regard for MMS can be attributed to new insights that I’ve learned just recently through my ongoing and deepening conversations with Grant, the Canadian connection who has such a passion for unveiling the liberating power of truth. When he calls, I listen, and learn.
He called today just as I finished editing the third audio conversations into a video (below). He was concerned about a recent video that Jim’s organization posted on YouTube titled, “Removing the Bad Taste of MMS (MMS1) with Baking Soda (Sodium Bicarbonate)”
The video shows Jim along side Ron Neer, editor of a newsletter titled, “Voice of MMS,” explaining how to soften the unpopular taste of a day’s intake, which was prepared by adding 24 drops of MMS (sodium chlorite) to 24 drops of the citric acid activator. (This is to facilitate, in a single preparation, a 3-drop per hour course, incrementally taken over an 8-hour period.)
After waiting 30 seconds for the two ingredients to combine and become what Sarin et al (1971) referred to as “chemically stabilized chlorite matrix.” This is a fundamentally different animal to the chlorine dioxide (ClO2) that we have grown accustomed to discussing. The chlorite matrix has always been the end product and active ingredient to MMS, created using one or more very specific light acids, and is distinguished chemically by ClO2-. That barely noticeable “minus” (-) sign behind the “2” means that it is a negative ion, and hence, a detoxified molecule.
In actuality, there is no “chlorine dioxide” (ClO2) present.
I originally believed that concentration was the distinguishing factor between how much chlorine dioxide can kill versus that which can heal. To some extent, it is still a factor. However, charge polarity is a more relevant distinction that should now be factored in. Negative ions are always positive, if taken in appropriate concentrations. Standard chlorine dioxide, which is positively charged, is never helpful, period.
With regard to Jim’s “sodium bicarbonate to MMS” video, Grant called with a warning to NOT do it, under any circumstances. The chemical changes that occur literally turn the product into what the FDA was warning the public against. In other words, it takes away the negative ionization of the chlorite matrix, leaving chlorine dioxide.
Below is a 10 minute conversation we had on the subject.
There’s more. Afterwards, he called back after doing a more thorough chemical analysis. That conversation lasted 80 minutes, and ties in several other related subjects.
While not an “end all” solution, MMS is on a short list of items that eradicate another item discussed in the second conversation mentioned above. Namely, the HeLa cell.
You may know little or nothing about the HeLa cell, but it has impacted your life, and very likely, is doing so right now. This is the video that I was preparing to upload when I received Grant’s call, and more is on the way.
The medicine industry’s now maniacal use of vaccines has gone far beyond any genuine appearance of concern for human health or life, and must now be considered as direct factors in the rise of many disease pathologies that were unheard of prior to Henrietta Lacks’ death from cervical cancer in 1951. Although there are many more, ones that immediately come to mind are autism, Alzheimer’s, Morgellon’s disease, and virtually any other pathology that you can think of, especially every form of cancer.
The thing you should know here, is that the chlorine ion, defined as “ClO2-” (with the minus sign) will, as the EPA stated in Chapter 4 of its Guidance Manual (1999), “become the dominant species in drinking water.” If it will do so in drinking water, it will do so in water, period, including the aqueous environment inside the human body.
Taken in Hermosillo, Mexico (2009)
If Jim Humble hadn’t brought MMS to our attention, it would have remained an obscure, little used, if ever approved, expensive drug, called WF10. But you should know that adding baking soda to MMS will turn it, chemically, into something that can indeed do harm. I will likewise post that conversation, which describes the chemistry in greater detail. Soon.
‘Standard of Care’ by Whose Standard?
“Medicine by the Book” is no friend of the public.
I have had the ongoing pleasure of regular conversations with Grant, who I referred to as “The Dot Connector” or “GM” in two videos thus far. He is truly an intelligent man. Although I don’t do it every time, each time we talk warrants recording, as invariably, something new to me, or a new take on an existing perception, will be covered. I bring this up because as these dialogues continue, I feel it important to understand that Grant’s “specialness” is NOT something that you or I don’t have. Instead, it is a level of NORMALCY that never left him, that is part of being human.
With all the news going on surrounding which man the directors of UNITED STATES CORPORATION will appoint to “lead” the organization as president for the next term, and what other distractions among many we’ll give our attention to, it seems almost as if we’re way out of touch with the pulse of public interest or attention. Yet, what Grant has brought to my attention, with regard to the HeLa cell alone, fairly well SCREAMS for more public understanding, because when you know where to look, and HOW to look, it is staggering, and liberating.
HEPATITIS CASE-IN-POINT
2 million baby boomers believed to be “infected.”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently issued notice that all “baby boomers” – that segment of the population born between 1945 and 1965 – should be tested for Hepatitis C. That would include me. The virus is considered a leading cause of liver cancer, claiming 15,000 lives each year due to related illnesses. The agency suggests that 2 million boomers have the virus and don’t know it. Their recommendation would be for one to come in for testing/screening, and where the virus is found, begin a 48-week round of interferon alpha-2b or Ribavirin treatments.
At $50 to $100 each, the testing process alone could add a $150 million stimulus to the medical industry, but getting 800,000 people on the prescribed Standard of Care, which costs from $50,000 to $150,000, could generate $60 billion in billings (averaged out at $75,000 each), if fully acted upon just once.
Of course, this all amounts to horse hockey, because following the Standard of Care will not restore the natural balance that actually defines, creates, or restores, a state of health. As such, if the Hepatitis condition goes away, you can pretty much count on something else eventually showing up to take its place.
Why? Because health care is a for profit business first. Health is neither its first priority, nor its second, or third. Health isn’t a priority whatsoever, only the appearance of the abatement of disease. I say this because we are succeeding at achieving the appearance of such abatement, at huge profits. We are not succeeding at helping people be well again. How can we when we’re gradually and consistently replacing natural materials for patented, unnatural ones? We can blame the producers for offering it, but what is forcing us to accept it, other than complacency, and a mistaken belief that medical standards and practices the very best possible?
We are paying a very high cost for this insidious wolf of a business model that masquerades in government protected, $cientifically authoritative sheep’s clothing. The only thing that is being “protected” in this situation, is market share of the medical service providers and their suppliers, and liability for the consequences of their recommendations. The public has no protection; they must pay with their money, hopes, dreams, health, and lives.
Oh how I wish this weren’t true, or even an exaggeration. If anything, this description of current medical practice as we know it, is an understatement.
Nobama Care
This story of the Hepatitis C concern comes out at a time when the Obama administration is trying to heighten the appeal of its health care reform law, called Obamacare. This program calls for mandatory enrollment into a health care plan, even suggesting penalties for non-compliance. However, it doesn’t call for mandatory use of methods by healthcare providers, that are known to help restore health. As such, this is a great windfall for the health insurance industry, which still only pays for methods that the policy makers approve. The medical policy makers continue to look askance at anything that isn’t inexpensive, adversarial, destabilizing, or toxifying in its metabolic effect on the body.
In making this story public, the Standard of Care for Hepatitis C is the only option that can be discussed in the mainstream media. As such, the entire population is led to believe that if they have Hepatitis C, irrespective of how they got it, the Medical Autocracy’s solution is the “best” and “most reliable” way to resolve it.
That too is a fiction.
I was editing a conversation with Grant for my radio show when he called today. We’ve now spoken further on this topic, and you need to hear it. For the moment I’m going to give you just a little piece of the longer one. This tidbit is on WF10, clinical trial results that won its developers a patent, and MMS. There is much more to come, but I want you to get acquainted with this caring and very awake being, knowing that such “awakeness” is both our birthright and responsibility. It is also within our power to restore.
Politics and Common Sense: “Oil and Water?”
Theme of the Republican National Convention
One of the two political conventions to nominate the next president of UNITED STATES CORPORATION is done, with one to go. Before the cameras, the entire world could see behind the façade of unanimity within the Republican party.
Control? Yes. Force? Yes. Unanimity? No.
Determined not to risk allowing even a dose of common sense to be broadcast into the few households or bars that may have been tuned in, Ron Paul delegates were ostracized, and their votes unilaterally hijacked by way of rule changes enacted at the convention prior to the customary roll call.
That’s the way this band of people get what they want, as they want it. I’m not singling them out. There’s still one convention to go. With regard to enacting policies that respect ALL people, there’s not much to distinguish one group from the other. The system thrives on divisiveness and fear. However, we don’t.
The bureaucrats don’t thrive by dutifully exploiting the American people. They’re just as likely to get caught by the effects of the mindset that rules them as the next guy. For example, I’d bet cancer researchers get cancer in numbers that are disproportionate to their percentage of the population. Many of our social and political problems are so because of good “worker bees,” trying to make a living, doing what they’re told, which means job security.
The ones who thrive off our fear and political dysfunction are above the bureaucrats’ pay grade. Whomever the president will be, he will first have to be approved by the real “bosses.”
As a criteria, respecting ALL people sounds like it would be unworkable as a political platform or military strategy, but that very idea was presidential candidate Barack Obama’s appeal; at least it was for me. I could care less about his skin coloration. To quote myself from A Freed Man: An Emancipation Proclamation, “We’re ALL a single shade of HUMAN.”
Mr. Obama spoke to something that is within all of us. Unfortunately, the rigors of running a CORPORATE ENTITY into the ground with its own board of directors – it’s not congress, and definitely not you and me – took over. Again, Mr. Obama was continuing what George Bush started before him, Bill Clinton carried on before him, and George H. W. Bush before him, etc.
These presidents wouldn’t have been “electable” if they didn’t “play ball.” But it’s time for us to wake up and see what’s going on. It’s time for a new game.
- No war, PEACE
- debt FORGIVENESS
- Clean up the environmental mess we’ve made
- Value every human being
- Heal ourselves, instead of practicing disease management
- Health care because WE’RE HUMAN, not because it’s business
- End the additions to, and neutralize existing toxins in land, sea, air, and within human bodies
I see the introduction of new crops and growing techniques in our future, and many new technologies emerging that allow us to restore natural balance and harmony both to the planet, and to our personal ecosystems.
Many new jobs will be available for those who want to participate in this major reformation project. But it won’t be by “force.” It also won’t be because it’s the only way to “survive.”
Imagine having all the “money” you need to acquire whatever your heart desires. Need a Gulfstream G650? You got it! Suppose everyone could have just what they want, and don’t have to “rob Peter” in order to do so. Peter can have a Gulfstream too if he wants. Don’t presume everyone will want Rolls Royce, but if getting one is no big deal, there are many who will gladly make theirs available to others.
Imagine how life would be if everyone was that powerful, and free. It would change behavior in many ways.
If we muster the collective will to make the world and every nation within it a safe, friendly, healthy place, it would be a great boom for tourism, commerce, and trade.
I’m not suggesting that everyone MUST do it. However, everyone who is inspired to do so, can. One doesn’t have to wait on anyone else to embrace and embody this vision. We wouldn’t need to use secrets, executive privilege, and political duplicity the way it’s routinely done today. Below is a case-in-point.
A dose of nuclear prospective.
Within the following four-minute talk by Texas congressman Ron Paul (see video below) lies what seems to me to be the real reason behind the sabre rattling that has been directed at Iran by both president Obama and Mitt Romney, as well as Israel.
The publicly expressed reason for the concern is Iran’s efforts to create a nuclear weapons program. They don’t have one, but these people seem intent on fueling Iran’s reason for needing one. Israel acts as though it’s itching to use preemptive military force against Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
There’s too much readiness to act against something that hasn’t happened and could be unlikely, which suggests that they’re afraid of something that IS happening.
All of the “protectors” in this discussion speak of the Iran’s danger to the region, having operated a nuclear program in secret for two decades, and, according to this New York Times editorial, having persisted in investing in it since 2002. Since they haven’t succeeded yet, that danger isn’t apparent.
So how have we handled this situation? Offer to step up diplomatic, cultural, or commercial relations?
Not hardly.
We threaten to pose a bigger threat. We threaten to get meaner, to force submission to our will. We threaten to cause damage to property and loss of life. That’s what military actions do. We position ourselves to give them and the rest of the world reason to be rightfully wary of us. We who have used nuclear weapons, threatening another country that doesn’t have any.
When asked for his position on this matter, Republican nominee Mitt Romney once said that he “supports Israel’s efforts to defend itself.” How can a preemptive military strike of any kind, in the absence of a prior military action, be construed as “defensive?”
To be clear, Mr. Romney stopped short of going on record in support of a unilateral military strike by Israel against Iran, but would “respect Israel’s right to take such action.”
That’s a master politician for ya. What I’d like to know is what is Iran’s rights in this equation? The reporter never asked that question, or it wasn’t published, perhaps because they don’t want you, the public to consider the rights of other human beings and nations to feel safe in their own lands.
But then, our government is going to great measures to encourage us not to feel safe in our own. My concern is not what Iran may do against the United States or Israel. My concern is that UNITED STATES CORPORATION IS doing/sanctioning/allowing, under the broad umbrella of GOVERNMENT policies and actions, against the American people.
If this was truly about nuclear weapons development, Israel could turn things around by simply assuring Iran that it is not, nor will it ever be, a threat militarily, as long as Iran takes no actions against it. Indeed, such actions could defuse the incendiary rhetoric, but I believe they are intentionally escalating it for the reasons mentioned in the video below.
It’s about the sanctity of the U.S. dollar, and the Fed’s license to print money out of thin air… a practice that must come to an end… very soon.
I stumbled upon this one and got a good laugh.
Feedback