A ‘Visual’ and Vocal Jim Humble on MMS

Jim Humble in the Van Gogh Cafe

Jim Humble in the Van Gogh Cafe, Amsterdam

I took the picture of Jim Humble in May, at the Van Gogh Cafe in Amsterdam. We were trying to find a place to eat, and to do a short interview during a break from the Nexxus Conference, where Jim was a speaker. It was a very short stay in Amsterdam, a beautiful city. The next day — Sunday — we were in southern Germany where Jim gave another talk on MMS.

I left them in Germany and headed for London, where I spent six days and conducted some interviews on another aspect of MMS that I’ll talk about later. That weekend, Jim spoke in Prague, staying in Germany much of that time. BTW, you should see this new European MMS site.

The New Light: A site about Jim Humble and MMS

The New Light

The site was created by Leo Koehof, a writer, photographer and videographer, who has traveled through Africa, witnessing and documenting his work there. I met Leo on my first trip to the Dominnican Republic earlier this year, and had the pleasure of journeying with him and three other classmates, on that memorable trip to Haiti.

The video below is excerpted from my interview with Jim a couple of weeks ago on my second visit to the D.R.

You can listen to the entire podcast by visiting the link below, on webtalkradio.net

Click here.

Saying ‘No’ to War on MMS or FDA

Jim Humble speaks at 2010 Nexxus Conference in Amsterdam

Jim Humble speaks at 2010 Nexxus Conference in Amsterdam

It is common practice to refer to the unfolding situation with the FDA and the Miracle Mineral Supplement (“MMS”) as a battle; a war that must be fought, and “won.” To MMS proponents, it is a “right” that must carried forward to overcome a “wrong.” Of course, the FDA is thinking the same way, albeit with the roles reversed and they are the “good guys” and Jim Humble and the MMS distributors the “bad guys.”

Oh yeah… the public are “victims,” a perception that may be shared by both. The FDA may not really care, since it protects the interests of corporate pharmaceutical entities, and is indifferent to criminalizing, prosecuting, or threatening anyone who appears to stand in its way. Jim Humble does indeed care for “the little guy.” I believe that both tend to underestimate the power that each citizen wields.

The goal of both the FDA and MMS proponents is for the other to “lose”. Both believe that their “victory” and the others’ “loss” is a “win” for their side. Such is the nature of oppositional thinking that has brought us countless wars – between nations, states, social causes (e.g., President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty (1964), Richard Nixon’s War on Cancer (1971), and the Bush/Obama War on Terror) and losses of life. What these efforts get us is more of everything that is opposed.

For the record, I am considered by some to be an MMS “proponent.” I don’t sell it, nor do I take it religiously. However, I can personally attest to MMS’ efficacy for me. From personal observation, study, and experience, I know that a light dosing of chlorine dioxide, via an MMS protocol (and there are several intake methods), will do more to help my health than the chlorine and fluoride added to the water supply.

Chlorine dioxide is effective against a wide range of pathogens that live in water, as well as the biofilm that they colonize (for protective purposes) in. The FDA’s saying that chlorine dioxide use is dangerous, as indicated via the MMS protocol, is tantamount to absurdity, given what they have sanctioned for human consumption and medical use.

Even if the FDA had acknowledged the merits of chlorine dioxide, but said that they had reservations and would like to see – and fund – research into its best use, the Agency might have had some credibility. Their total disinterest in looking at the merits of chlorine dioxide, in the face of hundreds of thousands of deaths each year from cancer and its treatment, diabetes, heart disease and many others, plus others from infectious diseases that drugs have shown themselves to be ineffective against, reveals a level of indifference to human welfare by the Agency that I find unacceptable.

Based on observed actions, their bias is toward corporate welfare, which makes its living from the perpetuation and management of disease. When you’re trying to perpetuate disease but not restore health, it means that people are needlessly killed off. Beyond one’s ability to pay the bill, life is no longer sacred.

In television ads for pharmaceutical drugs, have you heard something like, “if you can’t afford your medication, maybe A-Z can help.”

Sounds really caring doesn’t it?

A-Z will help get you addicted to its expensive, ineffective drug. Then you’re indebted to them twice-fold. If someone doesn’t keep up the payments, you can bet the drug will stop. The only problem is that we continue being led to believe that the drug may have helped.

Must Therapeutic Effectiveness be Expensive?

There are some who dismiss MMS because it’s so inexpensive. They think it can’t be viable if millions of dollars of research and countless double-blind studies and clinical trials haven’t been funded. What they don’t consider is that such Draconian measures aren’t necessary. If people get well, if the problem that is being combated goes away, then you’ve got a winner. We’ve grown accustomed to accepting a standard of activity that doesn’t even include restoration of health and well-being as its mandate.

From what I have seen, experienced, and have learned from others who have used MMS, it is clearly a superior tool than many that our medical system is relying on. People are dying each day from standard medical prescriptions and practices that actually make the patient’s problems worse, not better.

Consider how cancers tend to spread right after biopsies have been performed. A condition that was being contained by the body is immediately placed into the bloodstream where it quickly spreads. Consider how chemotherapy and radiation increase cellular stress on the entire body, adversely affecting healthy tissue in the process. Maybe this is why so many people believe that chlorine dioxide can’t be “selective” in its reactivity. It may not be checking the ID cards of pathogens, but anyone that has a natural electrical “signature” that is lower than the chlorine dioxide molecule (0.96 volts), will be toast.

The body doesn’t heal under stress. It heals as stress is relieved, and the stressors are removed. By there very nature, drugs increase cellular stress. MMS/chlorine dioxide appears to relieve stress.

Waging war on MMS, or on the FDA, will not change these facts. Doing so would mean that the FDA continues doing what it does, the way that it does it, and MMS will in fact, be around, and used in the way that Jim Humble has outlined. Both will “win,” and both will “lose.” In that respect, society will remain in the status quo, continuing tiptoe around the truth. Continuing to quietly help each other. Continuing to meekly present one’s self to the chemotherapy and cancer mill when doctor’s “data” has determined that you have cancer.

Some will say no to medical orthodoxy, but it will not be with the open and intelligent support of their doctors, because the practitioners, their teachers, medical schools, professional association (AMA), government agency (FDA), health insurance companies, charitable organizations and research facilities, will all remain slaves to a pharmaceutical god thought supreme. This is the change that needs to happen.

It’s time for medicine to acknowledge that Nature has an answer to every ailment known, and unknown to man. It’s the height of delusion to believe that we can do a better job at assisting life by using synthetic methods, or bring health by creating greater imbalance.

Embracing Mother Nature

Our belief in the primacy of technology and power of money have blinded us to the sublime and simple power of energy of Nature that denies itself to no one, yet is unavailable to anyone who denies himself.

Each human being is the keyholder, the solution to whatever problem one has. That is, unless one is in a state of waiting for someone else “better” to solve it. The better could be seen in terms of education, money, credentials, looks. Imagine how many people have called their doctor because they saw a commercial featuring a good looking paid actor or actress suggesting “that ____________ might be right for you,” even with its laundry list of side-effects that can include suicidal thoughts and death.

Such is the world we have created when we deny who we are, believe we are powerless, and need someone else to “save” us.

The MMS/FDA situation doesn’t have to be a war. Since the dynamics that brought MMS into being have established its right to be here, the FDA can fiddle with it, or mess with people as long as they want. They can try to defame the idea of chlorine dioxide use. It’s not going to work. This is not simply because of Jim Humble, but because the fundamental impulse and intent of LIFE is to LIVE. Chemicalization, as predominantly practiced by medicine and society today (e.g., food production, water treatment, environmental pollution), is antagonistic to life.

Department of Dubious Truth

While watching the NFL preseason game between the New Orleans Saints and San Diego Chargers last night, it was interesting to see the PR campaign in full force to get people to come to the Gulf, as the announcers went on and on about the oysters that they ate, and that oil is not a problem.

It is a statement that I dare say doesn’t ring true to most people. Just because you can’t see the oil doesn’t mean that it’s not there. More importantly, you can’t see the millions of gallons of the oil dispersant Corexit, which was banned in the UK more than 10 years ago due to its toxicity. Yet, it was okay to drop liberally on the Gulf. Perhaps people won’t keel over and die seconds after eating Gulf Coast oysters, but something inside us all knows that they’re not healthy. Yet, our FDA has declared them safe to eat.

If we stay in “winner/loser” mentality, this kind of stuff will go on. The FDA can tell us anything and we will meekly accept it, or oppose it under our breath. In the meantime, untruths become de facto “truths.”

Declaring war on the FDA isn’t a solution any more than their declaring war on MMS. The solution lies in each of us knowing ourselves… who and what we are. We are creators and co-creators of our experience. This includes the folks at the FDA and other agencies we love to oppose.

But remember, everything we oppose gets bigger. It grows. Oppose MMS, please, and watch it grow. Leave it alone, and watch it grow. Why? Because it is yielding results that help life without harming it. As for the FDA, we must speak our truth if they refuse to speak the truth.

We have the power to resolve this situation and grow, because the power to heal belongs with each and every human being, not with doctors, the FDA, the health care system, or anyone else. This may not be common knowledge, but when you listen to people who have healed, you gain insights into your own path. Note that the FDA only wanted information from people who felt they had been damaged by MMS, and claimed that ailments that people have reported success with were unrelated.

To Heal and to Cure Through Balance

The “H” word (heal) and “C” word (cure) are not the province or domain of technology, or pharmacology. If we want to heal ourselves, we need to understand our complicity in the problem’s evolution, and the laws, nature, and dynamics of balance. Then we must commit ourselves to restoring it, because if we are sick, we are not in balance. It’s that simple.

If chemotherapy or radiation helped restore balance, then it should be used. If it does not, it should not. The results will be the indicator. Healing and curing is evidence of balance being restored, not the efficacy of the drug, but of a change that has occurred within the person who was ill. The first change that must happen is in a place that won’t show up in diagnostic tests. The FDA isn’t thinking along these lines. I can’t speak for Jim Humble in that regard. But I can say that he has brought something to the world’s attention that should be noticed, studied, and used.

Ultimately, unseen and immeasurable forces influence the organizational and functional dynamics of the human body. You might call it consciousness. It’s the “who we are” part of the matrix that we’re oftentimes most confused about, and quick to dismiss. When we deny our nature as living consciousness, we also disavail ourselves to amazing power. The agent that makes that power appear to be absent, is fear. The agent that makes it grow, is love.

A chemical focus alone does not cover the bandwidth of the subtle realms, which is permeated with, and by love. However, we now know they’re present and in operation.

From a wonderful book, Spontaneous Evolution, by Bruce H. Lipton and Steve Bhaerman:

There is a famous story of a Native American grandfather talking to his grandchild. “There are two wolves fighting inside me,” said the grandfather. “One of them is of love and peace, the other is the wolf of anger and war.” “Which one will win?” asked the grandchild. “Whichever one I feed.,” was the grandfather’s reply.

MMS: Setting Perceptions Straight, 28% at a Time

Where's the 28% they're talking about?

Where's the 28% they're talking about?

Irrespective of what happens in the journey of MMS, the FDA has done a few good things. They brought the subject to the attention of a larger number of new people, and given those who do understand something about MMS an opportunity to set the misinformation straight.

This is not about “fighting” the FDA. They are doing what they have done, the way they have done things, for quite some time. If you don’t like their methods, then you have the power, ability, and responsibility to let them know. One way to do so, is to use products that you know are in your best health interest, and to not use products that you know will do you harm.

If you believe that MMS will do you harm, you should not take it. This doesn’t mean that MMS should not be available to help others, since we know that it can.

Toxic drugs should also not be given to people who object to their use. A person’s preference against chemotherapy should be respected. Doctors should have more in their tool box than chemo and radiation. Well, they should have other tools altogether to assist healing, unless the patient is actually asking for an agonizingly slow and painful death. This is what so many people get, you’d think they were asking for it. Yet Dr. Jack Kevorkian was vilified and prosecuted for helping people exit this world peacefully and of their own free will. If you’re kicking and screaming in pain, able to pay the bill or insurance premiums, but acting like you don’t want to die, it’s okay for them to poison you.

Doctors will try to coerce (not being the FDA, they can’t force) you into taking the drugs their “book” recommends, even if you have legitimate reservations. This policy should be changed. Any reservation about taking a drug is a legitimate one. I can understand a pain killer in a moment of extreme duress, but not in the absence of a conscious, concerted effort to help the patient restore health.

It’s ironic to see the moral “high ground” anti-drug crusaders take on marijuana and other street drugs, while sanctimoniously claiming they are not addicted to their even more expensive prescribed, and therefore accepted medicine. They get the benefits of addiction without the social and legal stigma attached.

However, drugs are not helpful if one’s goal is health and/or healing. Don’t take my word for it. Listen to a former pharmaceutical sales person tell how business is done.

Now, here’s a short video I produced that describes how MMS is prepared, and explains the confusion around the 28% solution, which is one of the reasons that the FDA claimed it is dangerous.

Let’s thank the FDA once again for giving us the opportunity to set perceptions straight to such a large new audience.

Desired MMS Outcomes, Power, and Beliefs

Jim Humble the educator prepares to teach at MMS workshop.

I have suffered from Epstein Barr Virus for 20 years & YES my first two weeks on MMS I ended up getting the worst chest cold I had in years. This was a form of detox to my body. I had pneumonia many years prior & had the best removal of hardened junk come out of my lungs. I could literally taste the ephedrine HCI (an energy pill I abused yrs ago) in my mouth and smell it in my nasal passages as that came to the surface too. After my cold ended I felt like a million bucks w/no EBV symptoms! — From YouTube viewer responding to Jim Humble’s FDA response

I received an email from a nervous MMS supplier, concerned about the potential ripple effect that might come from the FDA’s campaign. Her concerns are legitimate, but then each person has to ask, what can I do?

We operate in a mindset of they are “big,” and we are “small”, or “they have money and we don’t.” This is the thinking that has contributed to where we are today. We belittle ourselves and tacitly stand by while the “authorities” run roughshod over our freedoms, without a hint of exception on our part.

This is because we don’t know how to use our power. We think that power is in what we have, or in the case of powerlessness, what someone else has that we don’t. The truth is that power is within us all. We’re using it all the time, except it’s mostly unconscious. Anyone who thinks they are a victim is using their power to maintain their state. Have you heard the term, “the rich get richer while the poor get poorer?” There’s a clue there that often goes unnoticed.

Simply put, “rich” are those who see possibility in everything. “Poor” are those who predominantly see, and operate from a mindset of impossibility. While we cannot see, feel, touch, or otherwise measure or quantify them, beliefs are the switches that either turn on, or turn off possibility for an individual. They are bridges to knowing. A person who knows has the power of manifestation. If you “know” that you are sick, or poor, or inadequate, or unworthy, then you have, and are using your power to manifest your experience. You may not have been “the cause,” but you have made yourself susceptible, where others are not. On the other hand, others may be susceptible to conditions that don’t affect you. If we were to examine beliefs and attitudes, the wide range of experiences that we observe would make far more sense. We’d see a correlation between the creator of the experience and the experience itself, and not the random, haphazard process that appears so real.

We create different experiences by adopting new knowing. This is why knowledge is power. New knowledge and hence, knowing, are gained be demonstrating the willingness to adopt and embrace new set of potentiating beliefs. In other words, since present knowing is supported by beliefs. New knowing begins as information, which becomes knowledge that is then processed through, and integrated within a mind that was opened via new beliefs.

Any “poor” or “sick” person can transform their life. However, he will never be rich or well again without a prior belief change. Seeing is believing mentality will not work. One must believe, or be willing to believe in the new outcome, in order to see and ultimately experience it.

Only when one believes that wealth and health are possible and inevitable, does it even become potential. From potential the new reality becomes probable, and with more visualization and acceptance of its inevitability, it becomes actual. The process is like tuning into a specific radio frequency to play the station that delivers the music that you enjoy.

If you are convinced that your particular situation cannot be rectified, or your doctors have convinced you with their “data,” then you will be right. Change will not happen until you accept that it is possible, even if you don’t know how. The evidence that the change you seek for yourself is possible, is any positive change that anyone has experienced that were “against all odds.” What we don’t tend to understand is that we are the only one who has to believe in our very powerful nature in order to begin to consciously use it to change our world.

This applies to health too. If we are sick, especially those that evolved through the degenerative effects of over chemicalization, medical doctors, with their pages upon pages of printouts and test results, and their narrow focus on what is possible and what is not, then we’ll need to take stock with our true desires, as well as our true power.

My response to the MMS distributor triggered these thoughts, related to visualizing a different outcome from what many people are presently imagining.

I wrote:

I don’t know you, but I will say that you need to consult, not your mind, but your heart on what YOUR best move is. Ask your heart if you should power down and disappear, or whether you should continue to make MMS available? If you have no health claims on your web site, and it is a water purification product – which it has always been – then you must decide where you will stand, or whether you will.

You can also help by literally spending some time each day SEEING, again with your heart, the desired OUTCOME, ALREADY DONE. What is the desired outcome?

  • FDA RETRACTS its warning against MMS and explains to the public how it erred
  • That MMS be OPENLY available to the public, without feeling need to tiptoe around the FDA
  • The FDA knows and EMBRACES its therapeutic properties
  • LEGITIMATE clinical trials are done with MMS, comparing it against other antibacterial agents
  • MMS is integrated as a standard medical protocol
  • MMS remains inexpensive and widely available
  • Sellers (of MMS or ANY new modality that has shown merit) are not targeted and persecuted by the FDA
  • FDA doesn’t target or persecute ANYONE… that persecution and intimidation aren’t part of their operational ethos
  • Daniel Smith and all MMS sellers are held harmless, as they have harmed no one
  • Human health improves, by whatever means necessary…

One very important aspect to this exercise, is not being attached to the outcome. In other words, letting go. Letting go of attachment actually connects you to the outcome that you seek. It allows you to become one with it. Attachment to how things turn out, or fear about it, maintains a connection to what is feared. Beliefs are the activators or deactivators that we can change.

If you’d like to add to this vision of desired outcomes, please free to do so.

There’s nothing to lose, except perhaps if we don’t practice.

FDA: MMS is Harmful, and Gulf Oysters are ‘Good to Go’

MMS in spray bottle for topical applications.

It’s great to be back home, even while the drama surrounding MMS continues to unfold. The FDA is, albeit unintentionally, calling more attention to MMS and itself by embarking on this latest smear campaign. It’s a smear campaign because due diligence has not been followed on the FDA’s part. This is becoming the rule, not the isolated exception.

MMS is just one, and perhaps the latest example, of the FDA, like a latter-day Nero, fiddling with a promising medicinal compound or product while America’s health continues to burn. They use power because they have it, and have no compunction to criminalize people where no crime has actually taken place. Using coercion and intimidation behind the scenes, and misinformation and fear through the media, they show no concern for truth, no willingness to take a balanced look at all sides, to weigh the true merits of MMS versus any possible downside.

Such practices are not part of the FDA method because the truth about MMS and chlorine dioxide would reveal something they really don’t want you to look at; i.e., the absolute uselessness of the expensive, caustic, and death accelerating medications that the Agency has sanctioned and authorized for decades, bought and paid for by millions of human lives, in America and around the world.

I was particularly saddened last year when former NBA basketball player and jazz musician, Wayman Tisdale passed away due to the effects of the standard cancer treatment he received, in response to bone cancer condition. He took the chemotherapy, admittedly, a powerful dose. Then his leg was amputated. That was supposed to solve the problem. Then when it didn’t, more chemotherapy was called for. The logic was that he was a “big guy”, so the doctors surmised that they needed stronger medicine. He died, not from bone cancer, but from acute esophagitis, at just 44 years of age. That’s a problem with the throat.

Wayman Tisdale after leg amputation.

What could esophagitis possibly have to do with bone cancer in the leg?

Simply, the caustic substance, much like battery acid, had to be swallowed. If you listen to the FDA, MMS is made to sound like this. But then if that were true, it would be harmful. It would also bring about the kind of results that the FDA appears to think is acceptable, as long as you’ve paid the price of “protection”.

All the king’s horses and all the king’s MD’s, haven’t figured out that chemotherapy and radiation make the environment even more conducive to tumor growth. In his workshop Jim Humble repeatedly instructs that the sicker a person is, the less MMS should be used. Not because using more is dangerous, because it won’t harm them in the amounts suggested, but that it may be unnecessary in order to help the body’s innate healing processes get started.

The medical establishment and the FDA, which went to the same schools and are under the same umbrella of thought, think that the drugs actually heal or “cure.” Mr. Humble, and many more who have helped healing occur, realize that drugs inhibit, rather than facilitate healing. They give you the suggestion of relief by blocking pain sensation, while the reason for the pain either remains in tact or is escalated.

The body may need only a small amount of assistance to activate its own internal mechanisms to bring about healing. The mind must be on-board as well. This is actually more important. Current medical orthodoxy doesn’t embrace this kind of thinking, which is okay by me, except when they try to convince the public that a different approach that IS showing promise is harmful, but consider methods that Wayman Tisdale faced to be acceptable. That’s when they lose their credibility, and any right to dictate my choices.

There are thousands of Wayman Tisdales quietly passing out of this world each year through unnecessary, ineffective cancer treatment, while hundreds of millions of dollars are collected each year, often by sincere people, to find a “cure.” Yet, the FDA would persecute innocent people who have seen the merits (and positive results) of the human use of a disinfectant, and drive it off the market.

If this is acceptable to you, then do nothing, say nothing, read no more.

And perhaps, have some oysters from the Corexit and hydrocarbon marinated Gulf of Mexico, because the FDA says they’re good to go.

Here is a video response to the FDA that I shot on my most recent visit with Jim Humble.

Listen to more on Talk For Food

After a two week hiatus — couldn’t get a good internet connection to upload from there — here is my Talk For Food show, which includes a longer interview with the Jim Humble, and with a woman who conquered (not “survived”) breast cancer with the help of MMS.

Click here to listen…

A Prognosis: MMS, ‘Si’, FDA, ‘No’

Professor Jim Humble talks chlorine dioxide at his MMS Seminar

BARAHONA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC — At long last, Jim Humble’s Miracle Mineral Supplement, otherwise known as MMS, is surfacing, introduced to a much larger segment of the population, thanks to the FDA. However, thanks to the FDA, the first perception of the “miracle” product that this new and impressionable audience is receiving, is one of a poison, like an angel in skull and crossbones. So this coming out party is anything but a celebration, more like a boil that has just erupted.

By this carefully orchestrated act of behind the scenes manipulation, the public is being led to believe that MMS is a threat to their health instead of the very beneficial and effective chemical that it actually is.

I believe we should celebrate anyway, because the FDA has done everything in its power to (1) ignore, (2) observe and monitor, (3) weigh the genuine results that the public IS experiencing, and (4) go on assault to stem the tide by using a vendor – who has credibility in regarding MMS – to taint more public first perceptions toward its disfavor.

This was the best they could come up with, and it’s not going to work. MMS is not going away. Just my opinion, but I feel pretty good about it.

Truth cannot be suppressed. It is out, and it will outlast the deception and smear.

The very thing that the FDA fears (and you can bet that they, and the pharmaceutical firms whose interests and methods they protect, do fear it), they’re going to get in spades.

The public is not afraid of taking “strong medicine,” but they are sick and tired (if not dead) from taking medicine that maims or kills the host while leaving the microbes and parasites en tact.

Under the most extreme psychological duress designed to induce actions that appear voluntary so that their specious charges don’t have to withstand the burden of truth in court, the FDA has coerced PGL International into instituting a voluntary recall of MMS.

Like a string of dominos, other MMS sellers are being affected. Some will buckle, some will be unbowed.

The agency’s approach in pursuing a sham “voluntary recall” of MMS is reminiscent of Nazi Germany during the days of the Third Reich.

Such is the tumultuous gestation period and birth of MMS. My bet is that this is the beginning of its wide acceptance and therapeutic use, not the end.

With all due thanks to the FDA.

On the other hand, this may be the beginning of the end of the FDA as we presently know it, because its bias has been showing for quite some time, its objectivity is nonexistent because its priorities are skewed. It is not seeking to protect the health of people. My opinion is based on results that I see. Instead of openness to discovery and a commitment to improving health and healing, from wherever it comes, they are willing to make prisoners out of innocent people, and allow outmoded and unconscionable methods continue to represent the Standard of Medical Care.

The FDA protects the wealth and market shares, methods and madness of corporations and institutions that inhibit human health and prevent healing. If it’s evident to this city boy from Chicago, will be clear to the masses.

A Passion for Life; A Passion for Humanity

Class members record preparation methods.

BARAHONA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC — The MMS workshop has ended. Yet, after seeing evidence that the Genesis II compound is being watched by someone, perhaps from a satellite location, it is striking to see the fervor with which the remaining attendees explore the potential of chlorine dioxide (ClO2), via the MMS product and protocol.

The night that the group introductions were held was touching. Among the 20-something people gathered, there were at least 10 family and spousal losses attributed to cancer. One woman, C.W., was not among that statistical group of cancer losses, or “survivors.” She was thriving once again after being diagnosed with breast cancer, and saying “no” to chemotherapy and radiation.

When she reiterated her intention to not take the standard treatments, her doctor told her that he thought she would have come to her senses and not make such an ignorant decision.

Talk about bedside manner.

C.W. didn’t even know about MMS, which appeared on the scene the very next day. It was introduced to her by a friend.

She used many tools to restore the nutritional and microbial balance in her body, including diet and lifestyle changes, nutritional supplementation, exercise, and yes, MMS.

Hair analysis taken in 2009 showed extremely high levels of heavy metals. After a year of lifestyle changes, including the “old school” MMS protocol (15 drops activated, two or three times daily), hair analysis revealed barely detectable heavy metal counts.

All this from a “dangerous bleach.”

We don’t often hear the stories of people who have beat cancer and other debilitating conditions, mostly because those who do, find little support from their traditional health care professional, or the system that they work in.

Condescending tones by doctors are typical when patients choose to take another path. C.W.’s doctor threw additional sauce on the stew by telling her she’d be dead in six months.

Indifference or disinterest is another common response when patients choose to go outside the orthodoxy.

People who use MMS aren’t looking to go outside the medical orthodoxy. However, they have weighed modern medicine’s track record in treating degenerative and chronic diseases, and find the standard solutions unacceptable.

They are also beginning to realize that the human body can indeed restore its health if we are sensitive to its needs, and the environment that led to the dysfunction.

One common sentiment of the group that came to spend some time with, and listen to Jim Humble, who had the insight and gumption to develop a protocol for activating and using chlorine dioxide inside the body, is to build a better world. Fundamental to that better world is a healthy population. MMS is seen as a valuable and viable way to do it.

A healthy world; a healthy, balanced people, is an idea we’ve not had much experience with. It is touching to see the passion that this group of people from disparate continents, countries, and backgrounds share, for humanity.

Whatever happens to MMS, I know they’re out there.

MMS: The ‘Fit’ Has Hit the ‘Shan’

Jim Humble, who introduced the MMS Protocol

Jim Humble, who introduced the MMS Protocol

BARAHONA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC – Fasten your seatbelts, because the MMS story is about to take the greatest roller coaster ride of its life. The FDA is following up its July 30, 2010 warning on the personal and discretionary use of chlorine dioxide with a vengeance, having picked out a sampling of MMS suppliers in the United States and Japan (yes, Japan), to begin a global dissuasion campaign that you can be sure, will be televised.

On the heels of their warning, a convoy of FDA agents appeared at PGL International (www.projectgreenlife.com), in Spokane, Washington, and their fulfillment house, intent on gathering “forensic” evidence of wrongdoing.

On the same day, on the other side of the world, agents from the Drug Regulation and Monitoring Agency, a unit of Japan’s Ministry of Health, visited an MMS supplier in Tokyo, while agents from the Health and Hygiene Agency made another impromptu call to a distributor in Osaka.

According to a reliable source, the tone of the Japanese encounters was decidedly different from those in Spokane. After three days of investigation, the FDA representatives made their objective very clear; a full recall of all MMS sold. To make the appearance of justification of wrongdoing and harm to the public complete, they were offering no consideration to the company owners.

The purpose of a recall isn’t so much about returning MMS to the suppliers, it would amount to an admission of wrongdoing, of harm having been done on the public (who the FDA is “protecting,”), for which some form of “punishment” would be in order. The Agency has been mobilized to make discrediting MMS a priority, facts and evidence to the contrary, be damned.

IF “wrong” had been done, if harm had been done, I would be in full agreement with the Agency. However, they appear, curiously to be inactive and disinterested in the harm that happens daily America, thanks to drugs that they have evaluated, collected very high application fees for, and approved. MMS’ major “sin,” according to the FDA is, (1) not having gone through the approval cycle, and (2) making fantastic (presumed to be false and fraudulent) claims for what they call unrelated conditions.

The question of whether the claims, reported, not by the MMS sellers, but by people who have used it, are true, has not been considered. If the claims are true, then it may mean that the diseases mentioned, are not unrelated.

The FDA wants to discredit MMS before enough people put “2 + 2” together and begin asking these questions.

I suspect that it is too late.

MMS is not the only “public domain” chemical on the block that can point to fantastic claims that are true. Dimethyl Sulfoxide, otherwise known as DMSO, is another which is backed by over 40 years of clinical research. It was first formulated by Dr. Stanley Jacob at the University of Oregon Medical School.

Humble describes chlorine dioxide oxidation

DMSO: Nature’s Healer, written by Dr. Morton Walker and published over 20 years ago, lists research that began in the late 1950’s, when DMSO, a non-toxic chemical derived from tree sap, was shown to have a multitude of beneficial properties as a beneficial solvent. For example, instead of prescribing an anticoagulant to stroke patients, that “thins” the blood so as to facilitate circulation through an obstructed passageway, DMSO, with its extraordinary penetration characteristics, would simply and safely dissolve the clot, without introducing new toxicity into the body.

The scope of research done on DMSO is extensive. Symposiums of medical professionals were convened, as doctors envisioned and exchanged ideas on how they could improve their craft. Except… the FDA granted only very limited approval.

You can buy DMSO in a feed store to rub down your horse, but there are precious few places where you can get knowledgeable advice on human use, other than in books and on the Internet.

Living clay – Calcium bentonite – is another natural, non-toxic substance that can bring relief to a wide range of ailments. (See www.aboutclay.com)

The FDA should be working in the public interest. However, their efforts should be based on incontrovertible facts. Their case against MMS doesn’t rest on such a basis.

Harm Has Actually Been Done?

The FDA’s warning claims “serious harm” from drinking MMS. They said that, when used as directed, it produces an industrial bleach that can cause harm to health.

Examples of harm that they mention include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and symptoms of severe dehydration. These are indeed results that some MMS users have reported, but MMS is growing in popularity because they also reported recovery from the real problem that they sought relief from. This stands in stark contrast to most medicines used today.

Multiple unrelated diseases?

The FDA warning lists claims to treat “multiple unrelated diseases,” which include HIV, hepatitis, the H1N1 flu virus, common colds, acne, cancer, and other conditions. The operative word here is “unrelated.” If the reports, submitted by actual MMS users, are true, and if there are other products that have shown a similar level of effectiveness against a wide range of pathologies, then perhaps these conditions are related in spite of FDA statements to the contrary. IF they are, then the question shifts back to the FDA, the medical system, and the entire industry that has operated under the dissection principle, where diseases are considered isolated conditions that warrant very specific, and oftentimes multiple, simultaneous (and expensive) treatments.

No Interest Shown in MMS’ benefits.

In coming out in a decidedly aggressive effort to stem any further growth of MMS, the FDA reveals a blatant bias in the absence of interest in its beneficial effects. Excuse me if I’m wrong, but the last time I checked, plans were still being made for another walk, run, bicycle ride, or concert to raise money for cancer research. Telethons are being done for Jerry’s Kids, and many other worthy causes. Chlorine is a chemical that is routinely introduced into the human body without one’s consent, as is fluoridation, through municipal water treatment systems. NO ONE, certainly not the FDA, has taken an unbiased look at the health effects of several generations of this practice. So the bias doesn’t really appear to be for the public, as the FDA claims in its warning. It actually seems to be working against us.

What can YOU do?

As I said at the end of my documentary, Understanding MMS: Conversations with Jim Humble, the MMS protocol appears to have properties that could be very useful to society, specifically due to the effects it has on water. No health claims are really necessary. No promises are needed. It’s become widely known public knowledge that water quality, and water treatment methods, are not producing optimal results, and may indeed be contributing to the state of human health. Yet, the damage associated with these practices still go unexamined, or unreported.

If you have credible information, good or bad, about MMS, I invite you to send it to: [email protected].

Additionally I’d like to produce a documentary on the subject, asking and answering the unasked questions on this timely and soon to be controversial subject.

If you would like to contribute to the production effort, please send a donation via PayPal to the same email address above.

MMS Workshop: Back to Barahona and Haitian Memories

I’m heading back to the Dominican Republic, to do a Mulligan on the 5-day MMS Seminar and Workshop, in the coastal town of Barahona (pronounced, bah-RO-na). The timing of the FDA assault on MMS, where they mobilize their forces against a product that they have not given a fair, unbiased evaluation, in spite (or because of) the positive results people are getting, makes this a great opportunity to get Jim’s take on the entire situation while people from around the world travel to this tropical setting to learn about MMS from the man himself.

Jim Humble on camera in Barahona (1st MMS Seminar)

The first seminar, an experience that spanned two weeks, was amazing. It wasn’t just the learning, which went virtually non-stop from 9am-5pm, but getting to know the people and their own motivations for traveling such distances. Coming from as far away as Norway, Bosnia, England and Germany, plus Columbia and Peru in addition to Canada, Puerto Rico and the U.S., a diverse mix of backgrounds, languages, and customs were all set aside by the common desire to help others and help one’s self.

Jim Humble at the Whiteboard (MMS Seminar #1)

We stayed in a dorm-like setting (I understand there are private rooms now), men in one area, women in another. One of the men quickly gained a reputation for his snoring. He also distinguished himself for his dedication to helping others when five of us took a memorable trip to Haiti.

This doesn't even BEGIN to show how bad it was in Haiti.

We connected with a group of Korean missionaries, who agreed to receive us and give us an overnight place to stay. We agreed to assist them, as they sponsored a program to bring American doctors in to examine and treat the sick. Although they had never heard about MMS, they were curious, as were our hosts, as to what brought us there. They listened with open minds.

Presenting MMS concept to our Korean missionary hosts.

The real presenter was a young woman, Jenny Jung, a Korean native who now lives in Atlanta. She witnessed her father’s amazing recovery from a chronic ailment, and a year of prescribed steroid treatments which were not only ineffective, but degenerative. Yet, a short time after taking MMS, he was back to normal. Jenny decided that she had to tell the Korean world about MMS (a mission she has since embarked upon).

Jenny Hye Young (Jung) speaks from experience.

The group asked questions, and took MMS themselves. One of the doctors, who had eczema, applied an MMS solution directly, with a sprayer. The next morning he reported that the infected area definitely felt better. All of them wanted copies of Jim Humble’s book, which Jenny took the initiative to purchase and bring to give away. Two of the four doctors also prepared the 8-hour cocktail, a 3-drop per hour dosing, and drank 1/8th each hour during the course of a grueling next day’s work.

A doctor takes MMS break while administering to Haitians.

We were given permission by the missionaries and the doctors, to set up a station that Haitians who came in for treatment, were directed to, particularly those with malaria or dengue fever. We were the next to last stop… the last one being a laying on of hands, also by the doctors according to their faith, and earnest, fervent prayer. The FDA would dismiss such nonsense, especially since it can’t be patented, but the last two stations on that day were, in my opinion, the most powerful.

The last stop...

As the day wore on, an enthusiasm had emerged for this new-found and useful discovery.

Two doctors use MMS in spray to disinfect hands.

There are many beneficial clinical uses for chlorine dioxide, in the levels that Jim Humble has tested and proven, for anyone who really cares to look.

Using MMS topically on Haitian man.

We even sprayed some on an emaciated puppy that was clearly in need of some pathogen reduction.

A puppy gets MMS spray.

The entire experience was moving in ways that words cannot adequately express. All of this would get dismissed by an FDA as it thinks today. When the business of disease has become a growth industry, when television advertisements pander to the belief in the eventuality of sickness, and even a friendly suggestion of a glass of water to a dehydrated person can be construed as practicing medicine without a license, things have gone too far. Health and healing are clearly no longer important, when you would shut a promising modality down while not having all the relevant answers yourself. A relevant answer is one that helps the questioner achieve a desired goal. Survival is the bare minimum of what a cancer patient wants to do. They want to be healthy again. For all of the billions that they have raised and extracted from the public, cancer treatment industry and the FDA doesn’t offer any approved cancer treatment modalities that allow any confidence of healthy longevity. Yet, people are curing themselves of cancer and many other diseases of our times, by going “off-the-grid,” and back to balance.

In its way, MMS helps restore balance. It’s not the only way, but it is an effective way to do so.

I’m going back to Barahona to record Jim Humble’s next complete MMS workshop. Well into his 70′s, he has continued his research. We owe it to ourselves to learn more about chlorine dioxide, since it has been brought to our attention. You can pre-order the package, which will include at least 8 DVDs, by clicking the link below. The workshop tuition is $750. The course materials, certificates, and DVD-set, are $350.

Cover Art for MMS Seminar DVD-Set

Click here to pre-order.

MMS: The End… or is it the Beginning?

Jim Humble wonders what the next step for MMS will be.

Now that the FDA has shown its hand on MMS, it’s now reasonable to wonder what’s next. Is this the end… or is it the beginning? It is a point that, most likely, has been anticipated by Jim Humble, who worked out the protocol for generating chlorine dioxide in levels safe enough to be used inside the human body. Although the FDA, Health Canada, and a host of other government health agencies haven’t looked at them, the results speak for themselves.

History offers many examples of interference, harassment, persecution and prosecution by government agencies of individuals who introduced “alternative” products that actually produced positive results. However, there’s no reason to assume that MMS will be another such story. Jim Humble had the wisdom to write his story down in his book, The Miracle Mineral Supplement of the 21st Century. His travels included approaching the FDA, which had no interest in MMS, since he was introducing it in Africa. After approaching other agencies that expressed an interest in human health and curing diseases (WHO, Gates Foundation, among others), he made his MMS story public, even making half the book available as a free download. The other half, which talked about how to prepare MMS in volume, was available for a nominal fee. His book has been translated into Spanish, French, and German, with other languages in the works.

While some editors would criticize Humble’s writing style, and some have criticized his interpretation of the chemistry (the aerobic/anaerobic debate), few can ignore the fact that the overwhelming preponderance of results reported by actual MMS users — people who KNOW what they were going through before, and after — has been positive. This should be cause for greater interest and support by the FDA, instead of warnings and dissuasion.

The positive results MMS users have reported stand in stark contrast to the ever more expensive, drastic, and ineffectual results that are being reported by the myriad research organizations that purport to be searching for various “cures” to the mounting list of maladies that the public is experiencing. If all the many billions of dollars have not yet yielded results anywhere near as positive as Humble has instigated via MMS with perhaps a few 10′s of thousands, it is probable that the FDA’s unfavorable stance is more to save face, than to protect the public.

Product is prepared in the kitchen at the first MMS Workshop, Barahona, D.R.

The problem with this tactic is that the public sees the FDA’s bias in favor of the pharmaceutical industry and its patented chemical ways, for what it is. Patenting allows the pharmaceutical companies to “protect” the financial interests of their investors, stockholders, market shares, and other business factors. It also allows them to charge astronomical prices for their drugs, which IS being done, thanks to the insurance industry that collects premiums from the public, and then decides which medications they will pay for. If results are a true indication of intention, then helping the public to recover from illness, or sustain their health, is not actually important. The powers that be don’t seem dissatisfied enough with results to be open to promising alternatives. They can use “bleach” to clean up toxicity or disinfect water on a large scale, but don’t you do it in scaled down dosage, even though there’s some reason to believe it works.

The public needs to put their money into insurance companies that pay for what has proven to work to the patient’s satisfaction. And while some may be skeptical that this will ever happen, I am not. It must happen, and it will.

What appears to be more important to the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry, is achieving what appears to be medical “relief” without actually fixing the problem. This is why their ads talk about relieving symptoms. If it is to mean anything, truth in advertising would preclude claims that any synthetic pharmaceutical could actually resolve a real medical problem. They cannot. The real problem is that purveyors of the products that actually do help the body repair and heal itself often have to figure out ways not to tell you, so that they won’t incur Inquisition-like scrutiny by the FDA.

This scenario makes the process of healing and recovery a slow one, if it happens at all, more for political reasons than by actual necessity.

Current medical practices do more to maintain the problem and keep the patient an active candidate for the doctor’s visit, for the drugs, and other services, than to help them get well. Even the simple act of administering an antibiotic may fix the problem of the moment (it also may not). However, antibiotics will kill off aerobic microorganisms in the stomach. By not automatically taking steps to replenish this vital group (the anaerobic are important too), an imbalance is then established which can show up as another form of susceptibility somewhere down the line.

Pasteurizing and homogenizing milk is not a medical responsibility per se, but it falls under FDA oversight. This practice kills off aerobic microorganisms and digestive enzymes that would otherwise aid digestion and restore balance (not to mention the real vitamin D that raw milk contains), thus helping maintain or restore health. Yet, raw milk producers are like the bastard children to the dairy industry. They are forced to print warnings on their labels that suggest great harm if the product is ingested, while pasteurized milk producers do not have to warn of the dangers that their products portend. The milk that you buy for $1.99 a gallon at the local supermarket will do real damage, not only for what it is putting in you (including the antibiotics that the cows are given), but for the real nourishment that is not going in. The effects of these practices occur slowly, over time. We don’t see the corporate, industry association, or regulatory culprits that instigate it, and then assume that the problems we encounter are of our own making, “luck” or fate. They are those things, if we do nothing to change our ways.

The public is not against doctor’s visits, if the doctor uses tools that will actually help fix the problem, instead of masking it. That doctor should understand that the body and those microorganisms that reside inside it, not the medications, are the only curing agents in conjunction with the willing patient. The medications and nutrients are all tools to get it done.

MMS is a tool that any doctor that administers antibiotics, treats infections, performs surgery and many chronic conditions, should have readily available. It’s not that it would be used all the time, or exclusively, but if the patient’s condition warrants it. This is what is being frowned upon by the FDA’s ruling; a stance that is likely mirrored by the AMA, and the various journals that tend to influence medical and public thinking, as well as the schools that train future doctors, and the insurance industry that pays for patient claims. None of these groups seem to have noticed that, outside of emergency medicine, their standard, chemical dominated modalities are not working. The practice of giving an anticoagulant, or blood thinner, originally marketed as a rat poison to stroke patients, is one such example. Giving highly poisonous mustard gas to cancer patients in an attempt to “kill” cancer tumors is another. This is a deadly game of medical roulette that may pay well for the doctor and hospital, but sucks for the patient. These practices, initiated several generations ago, have moved beyond all forms of reasonableness, given what we have learned about balance and its role in sustaining or restoring health, and the new science of epigenetics, which looks at overriding factors beyond the genes that can bring about true resolution of medical and life problems.

The way things stand now, most allopathic doctors have become licensed drug pushers. The medications that they administer are antagonistic to normal physiological functions and processes. How can anyone expect to help a patient return to normal (health) by adding new layers of substances that only increase cellular stress?

Given the results that current medical practice and research are delivering, it makes no sense for the FDA to even dare attempt to suppress or dissuade the public from the use of MMS without a benign and conciliatory attempt to confirm and validate the claims. It further makes no sense that they would presume to know what’s in the public’s best interest while having no knowledge of what MMS does, or even inviting people who have benefited from its use to step forward and share. Clearly there’s an opportunity to learn here, if there’s a willingness.

In the meantime, it is incumbent upon the private individual to look out for self and family, since it is clear that the agencies that were established in the public trust, are asleep at the wheel.

——

MMS Training Seminar — Barahona, Dominican Republic (August 9-13, 2010)

Jim Humble covers MMS intake methods at the first workshop

In light of the official interest in MMS that the FDA has now shown, learning about MMS, what it can do, and how to use it has become even more important, not only for Americans, but for people around the world. Jim Humble has put together, and is offering an intensive, 5-day course on MMS, at the Genesis II Mission, in Barahona, D.R, August 9-13, 2010. As you can see by the photo above, he has learned many ways to facilitate MMS uptake by the body, which should be studied and understood by medical staffs around the world. For more information, you can email: [email protected]

If you cannot attend, but would like to purchase video of the Seminar (most likely a 6-DVD or more), please email me for more information.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 905 other followers