A crowd funding site has been created to raise funds for Daniel Smith to sufficiently pay for and present his defense with regard to selling the Miracle (Master) Mineral Supplement (Solution), or “MMS”. Please make a donation if you can.
Jim Humble, who introduced the world to what became “MMS”, a name he gave the product because its effect on malaria seemed like a miracle, recorded an audio to request donations, to which a montage of images were added.
By the time the trial begins, it will be in the eighth year since the product began to be offered. We now know that it’s no miracle that brings about the broad beneficial effects to human biochemistry. It is the normal result of what happens when imbalances due to antagonistic chemical saturation are remediated and cellular bio-electricity is restored. Any method that achieves these ends will produce the same results. “FDA approved” treatments do not achieve these results.
I am not saying this simply because the FDA has approved them. I am saying this because what the agency approves and has approved — in thousands of instances — are antagonistic, synthetic, cause greater imbalance, and therefore impair cellular bio-electricity and zeta potential. This doesn’t make the agency wrong. It makes the preponderance of their choices wrong for the people who the products are given to. Great (highly profitable) for the makers, but terrible for the patients. Worst yet, the patients are encouraged to ask “if _______ is right for them,” as if these products were actually helpful.
If this is intentional, the public should know. If it’s not, the agency must change, because the public now knows.
The agency, with the help of the bulldog Department of Justice and a compliant, if not controlled court system, is out to stop MMS by making an “example” for others by targeting Daniel Smith, an intelligent man who, like millions of others, has seen the “health care” system morph into a disease management, and then into medical disease causation and management system, in our generation, and decided to do something about it.
This is from his GoFundMe site:
Over the last two years, Daniel has argued several of his motions before the judge. Each time, under the tutelage of those more experienced, Daniel’s level of confidence and presentation improved. Seasoned attorneys commented that Daniel argued better than 90% of all other attorneys they’d seen. Others agreed, Daniel had out-argued the prosecution hands down. Nevertheless, the judge’s rulings always ended with the word: “DENIED“.
Where the prosecution faltered, the judge covered for the government. Where the prosecution failed to argue, the judge argued for the government. Where the prosecution filed false pleadings, the judge swept them under the rug. When Daniel’s argument could not be easily overcome, it was omitted or liberally misconstrued to clear the way for a ruling in favor of the government. This is the state of our federal district courts in America. The doctrine of Separation of Powers is an ideal that lost its way when the courts became embroiled in bonding – and thus monetizing -every case that it hears.
Whether MMS is available or not, this is no way to treat people who stand, not only on conscience, but on science, and whose efforts have helped, not harmed others. The agencies have no right to fabricate and mislead the public, the court system, or bully the media and sister agencies around the world to claim great harm in order to make something beneficial unavailable to you.
There is another great video on the site, produced by the Water Reference Center, which is based in the Netherlands. I traveled to Amsterdam to meet Klaas Proesmans, CEO of WRC while in Europe this past August. The video documents a test that was conducted, December 2012, by the WRC in conjunction with the Ugandan Red Cross, demonstrating the effect of sodium chlorite disinfection of water, which is also the main constituent of human blood. They were able to confirm a very fast residual effect on the malaria parasite, even inside an infected human body. This is consistent with Jim Humble’s initial observations, which most experts and skeptics were disinclined to believe. It is amazing that since it was uploaded July, 2013, slightly less than 600 people have viewed this video.
How dare a “public” agency trump up falsehoods and broadcast them around the world, then spend millions to prosecute a private individual for seeing a way to help people, when the agency was, in effect, harming the very people it is supposed to be serving?!
Make a difference. Please donate and spread this notice.