Search

Vaccinations: Time to Speak the Unspeakable

By the time an individual learns about vaccinations it’s too late. Someone else will have made the decision that we must have one. Most likely a parent or guardian. As such, the deed will have been done years ago, evidenced by a tell-tale mark that was left on one shoulder.

Today it’s possible to have had immunization shots before you were born. Still without your consent.

There are other signs of evidence that one has been vaccinated, and it’s not in the form of good health. It could be autism spectrum disorder and its variations. It could be seizures. It could be sudden infant death. Few are willing to acknowledge that there might be a connection, but many will “defend” the system that doesn’t take careful measures to monitor and question its practices. They tend to be ones who either make their living from these practices, or defend the “$cience” behind them. The quote below by Dr. Mayer Eisenstein isn’t one of them.

“We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we’ve taken care of over the years, and I don’t think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines…….Every doctor now essentially in this country has done something as heinous as the Nazis did, unknowingly.”—-Dr. Mayer Eisenstein

Believe it or not, evidence exists which suggests that the wisdom of vaccine policies and practices may not only be questionable, but may be an unacknowledged contributor to a long list of chronic and degenerative diseases. Critics were not lay people like myself who might be quickly dismissed, but highly respected medical doctors, some of whom were ostracized for speaking out.

Without benefit of informed consent or a second opinion, a vaccinated individual is left only with the option to hope that it did indeed help strengthen the immune system, or at the very least, did no harm. It could take anywhere from a few days to many years before we know for sure.

There is no question but that perfect sanitation has almost obliterated this disease (smallpox), and sooner or later will dispose of it entirely. Of course, when that time comes, in all probability the credit will be given to vaccination. – John Tilden, M.D. (1851-1940)

Oddly, there is no second opinion about vaccinations, no safe haven where nature’s ways are remembered, understood, and respected. We’ve become so convinced in the story that has been passed down through the decades – of virulent and dastardly diseases vanquished with needle and serum – that the only way to combat the growing rash of new pathologies that persist in raining on our health parade, is by pressing the pedal of the vaccination rescue wagon ever harder to the metal.

Perhaps we’re going too fast for our own good.

The practice of administering vaccinations is now unquestioned in medical and science communities. And why wouldn’t it be when authoritative books, such as the 1,725-page Vaccines (Plotkin, Orenstein, Offit 2008), have this to say:

Despite its relative youth, since the time of Edward Jenner, vaccination has controlled the following 12 major diseases, at least in parts of the world: smallpox, diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, measles, mumps, rubella, typhoid and rabies.

In the case of smallpox, the dream of eradication has been fulfilled, because this disease – at least naturally occurring disease – has disappeared from the world. Cases of poliomyelitis have been reduced by 99% thanks to vaccination, and this disease also is targeted by the World Health Organization for eradication.

The impact of vaccination on the health of the world’s peoples is hard to exaggerate. With the exception of safe water, no other modality, not even antibiotics, has had such a major effect on mortality reduction and population growth.

Please pay close attention to the last paragraph, we will revisit it later.

The New York Times Health Guide features an entire section on immunizations (vaccinations), including explicit advice on why they are needed, including the following:

For a few weeks after they are born, babies will have some protection, which was passed from their mother through the placenta before birth. After a short period of time, this natural protection goes away.

“Natural protection goes away?” It’s in the New York Times, so it must be true, right? That’s certainly what a young parent may very well think.

For these and many other reasons, any question as to the efficacy or wisdom of administering vaccines is tantamount to heresy. But that’s not all. Emboldened, and not satisfied by their success in raising vaccinations to unquestionable status, proponents have pushed to make the practice mandatory, even including prenatal cases. In other words, to force them, early and often, on young and old alike.

With the question of efficacy no longer being asked or assessed, the true effects of vaccinating wouldn’t be acknowledged if it hit us upside the head. The “disease” is conveniently available to take the blame instead.

The idea behind vaccinations is to affect an immune response to a particular potential disease by insinuating what is, in essence, a foreign agent carrier. An overload condition of the variola virus, the disease known as smallpox is attributed to several major population reductions that have occurred throughout history.

Why look at vaccinations now?

Increasingly, the evidence is showing that vaccinations are not doing the great good that we’ve accepted to be true, and for those willing to look, history reveals that they never have.

The above graphic, which was posted on the blog Ascension with Mother Earth and Current State of Affairs, speaks for itself.  Yet, a commenter who chose to remain “anonymous,” is dismissive, suggesting in one breath that the drug companies are to blame and not the vaccines, and that it is conjecture, not science.

If there is even a shred of truth to the graphic, then this is cause for concern. Both of my children received vaccinations as they were coming up; my son in 1977 and daughter in 1985 as a requirement for enrollment in California public schools. Yet, if vaccinations themselves are not really helpful… to put it another way, if vaccinations are really dangerous to the human, then requiring a parent to submit the child to vaccination is nothing less than extortion, and contributes to a greater conspiracy.

This subject was brought to my attention by the man who, a couple years ago, appeared out of the blue to answer naysayers who have posted their responses to this video excerpt of Dr. John Humiston from my documentary on Jim Humble’s Miracle Mineral Supplement titled, Understanding MMS: Conversations with Jim Humble.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp1eqTajcpQ&w=448&h=252&hd=1]
Dr. John Humiston weighed in on MMS in my documentary.

Writing under the screen name of frootloopsian, he has demonstrated a depth of knowledge of the molecular dynamics of MMS that exceeds any that I’ve heard, including Jim Humble. In addition, the focus of his attention is not MMS. He has no bias for, or against it. As such, in explaining how it works and why it is important, he points to other effective products that share the same chemistry.

In our mutual desire to learn, compile and share that knowledge, we have begun a collaboration on a new book that I’ll tell you more about soon. I’ll say this, vaccinations are only part of a larger problem that we should understand, and MMS is one of a number of solutions that should also be understood.

At the most fundamental level, however, we have before us an opportunity and responsibility to discover, and then exercise, that immeasurable element that is within.

Now it’s time to revisit the quote from Vaccines:

The impact of vaccination on the health of the world’s peoples is hard to exaggerate. With the exception of safe water, no other modality, not even antibiotics, has had such a major effect on mortality reduction and population growth.

The evidence that we are uncovering suggests the following: “No other modality has had such a major effect on population reduction and mortality growth.”

Ending the practice of administering vaccines is one thing that the medical industry can do to demonstrate that it truly cares for the health and well-being of humanity. I’m not holding my breath on that. Refusing to permit our children to be given vaccinations is something we can do as well.

There; I’ve said it.

Please follow and like us:

Written by 

Related posts

0 Thoughts to “Vaccinations: Time to Speak the Unspeakable”

  1. Andrea Davis

    First off….WOW….I love the amount of knowledge on your site! It is amazing! I stumbled upon it while researching magnesium. 🙂 Just made my own homemade magnesium spray today. I digress. I had a question about vaccinating my 5-year-old. I am a little late the my understanding of vaccines. Sadly, she has already had most of the vaccines “recommended,” and her doctor is saying she needs 5 more to be current. I’m really struggling with this. My question is this: since she has already had all of the vaccines up to this point, should I go ahead and finish them out, or not give her anymore? I know that sounds silly, but I have no idea what has already been done to her body and if I am going to leave something “unfinished”, I guess is what I’m getting at. I totally disagree with vaccinating children, so my question probably sounds silly…..Please advise! 🙂 Thank you!!!

    1. Hi Andrea… I would suggest that you request a specific list of the five more vaccines that your doctor is advising you that your daughter “needs.” Once you get that list, there are sites that you can consult that will tell you the actual ingredients of each.

      When you KNOW what is in the vaccine, you have a better idea of gauging how it might impact her metabolically. You can then better determine the risk that she may be under, because the chemical compounds that these serums represent are not metabolized by the body; they are stored, and the alterations that they cause remain in effect if they are not neutralized.

      It’s time to get beyond disagreeing with vaccinating, and KNOWING why. Also, knowing how to neutralize the effects of vaccines already taken.

      I want to strongly suggest that you do this with CONFIDENCE, not fear. Nothing has been done that can’t be corrected. However, you don’t want to knowingly do additional harm, if harm is evident.

      Let us know what you learn.

      1. Andrea Davis

        THANK YOU! Yes, that is the big thing, isn’t it? FEAR. The mainstream medical society wants you to live in fear of NOT vaccinating! People who go against mainstream are considered freaks and fanatics! I have never heard about being able to neutralize the effects of vaccines! I have a lot of research to do!

    2. grant

      Andrea, there are countless advocates for ZERO vaccination. Few are as well trained and informed as the man presenting the Youtube video titled… CDC’s Vaccination Genocide.flv.

      As you research the vaccines, you will note much reference to the Thimerosol MERCURY used in the vaccines. Of course, you will also research mercury’s effect upon the human.

      The true danger in vaccine is well hidden within the contagious simian cancers such as SV40, the contagious animal and human viruses, and the contagious Human Papilloma (herpes). The HeLa cell, first mentioned during 1953, carries herpes and is responsible for placing the above-listed mess into your child’s DNA, via the process “lateral gene transfer”. Any non-human DNA present in the vaccines also is placed in that DNA.

  2. Gilgamesh

    SOTT.net Aug 2 2012

    Syringe
    Collusion Between Pharmaceutical Industry and Government Deepens
    Dr. Mercola
    Mercola.com
    Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:53 CDT

    Syringe
    Collusion Between Pharmaceutical Industry and Government Deepens
    Dr. Mercola
    Mercola.com
    Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:53 CDT
    Print

    Syringe
    Collusion Between Pharmaceutical Industry and Government Deepens
    Dr. Mercola
    Mercola.com
    Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:53 CDT
    Print

    Collusion Between Pharmaceutical Industry and Government Deepens
    Dr. Mercola
    Mercola.com
    Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:53 CDT
    Print

  3. grant

    Arrow. Your statement couldn’t be more inaccurate. In fact, the reading of one paper or text doesn’t educate anyone. You must read and research EVERYTHING printed from 1717 to 1866.

    I read everything printed on smallpox from 4 continents, involving 3350 years.

    The Constantinople comment should be about variolation, which used HUMAN smallpox scab material in a relatively safe manner. The vaccination (VACA means COW) used in England and France, was Jenner’s stolen copycat effort originally used by an English farmer.

    Lady Montagu of France, and her friend Queen Consort Caroline of England, were responsible for not only bringing (1721) Variolation to their countries, but also for the changing of the method of application. The scab material remained from human smallpox. Neither the Ottoman Empire, France, or England gave free Variolation or vaccination. The Ottoman Empire record showed scab material as a trade good. English Vaccination LAWS stated that the Vaccine controllers were ORDERED to charge NO LESS THAN 18 Pence per treatment.

    Both Variolation and Vaccination quickly transferred smallpox to untreated populations, especially those populations living under poor conditions. The vaccinated public were highly contagious, and the above-mentioned text stated that smallpox epidemics were most evident among the greatest percentage vaccinated public.

    There are six text written by Doctors and/or Ph.D’s during that time which are important, in that their Authors ALL formed Anti-Vaccination Leagues. Two of those text were used as sworn testimony during Royal Commissions investigating Vaccine.

    One of those text produced evidence which caused England to ban use of Vaccine.

    frootloopsian.

  4. I suggest that folks read the history of smallpox. It is not a disese that is spread by poor hygine. It is a contageous viral infection clearly transmitted from person to person regardless of hygine and not to someone who had already had smallpox or the cowpox. In the Ottoman empire, Constanople,they vaccinated for small pox for likely centuries before this vaccine made its way to Europe and they suffered very little small pox there. It was given freely to even the poorest of people. Constanople was not known for great advances in hygine. Communal bathing was common. They had nearly erradicated small pox in their area of the world.

    One needs discernment with the vaccines. Small pox was not erradicated due to improved hygine.

  5. bornoutsidethebox

    Thank you for adding your powerful voice and gift for incisive communication to exposing the truth about vaccines. Your work is greatly appreciated.

  6. Donna G.

    Greetings, I want to first say Thank You for all the information you share.
    Are you familiar with the book, Poisoned Needle : Suppressed Facts about Vaccinations by Eleanor McBean published in 1957 ? I happened upon it while searching Google for more information about Vaccination injury to the Elderly.

Leave a Comment