Welcome to the next phase. That is, of getting to know who we are, and reclaiming our power to heal. It’s certainly been my journey, as we spend day after day, moment after moment, inhaling this invisible thing called life and exhaling. Life accepts what we give it, transforms it into that which sustains itself, and then immediately makes it available to us. This includes the process of healing, which is the ever active foundation of health.
by net efekt
Healing is that process that involves living creatures and beings (humans being one example), wherein function, laid out according to an original blueprint or design, is restored and maintained. The word that we’ve chosen to signify when the healing process has occurred, is “cure.” Methods that have been determined to bring about healing from certain dysfunctional conditions, are often referred to as “cures,” a fact that brings us to our current social conundrum.
According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the word “cure” or claims of curative properties, can only be ascribed to pharmaceutical drugs. They take this logic a step further by claiming that anything that brings about molecular alteration in the body shall be considered a “drug,” and therefore, be under its jurisdiction. Indeed, as it stands now, the FDA’s jurisdictional reach extends to 1/4th of every dollar spent in the United States, or roughly $1 trillion. However, their logic is based on a patently false premise.
I’d have no problem with FDA jurisdiction if their practices actually benefited American citizens. However, it’s now a culture that is steeped in, and beholden to, the primacy of the drug, wherein natural approaches are either dismissed, discounted, or discredited. And when they can do neither, they attempt to create distance between the consumer and natural remedies, while trying to get the market under its control.
Again, this is not happening all the time, in large part because the public is generally uneducated in how natural products work versus synthetic. As far as most people are concerned, if there’s no appreciable difference between a naturally occurring or derived chemical, they’d just as soon take the brand they’re familiar with, and can get at the corner drugstore.
As far as consumers are concerned, there may be little difference between such chemicals as chlorine dioxide (produced via the MMS protocol) and dymethlsulfoxide (DMSO), and a synthetic drug like coumadin (blood clot medicine) or aspartame which is used in over 6,000 products as an artificial sweetener.
There’s a huge difference in the effect of these compounds. The former are safe and effective. Chlorine dioxide is a unique oxidizer that only acts on micro-organisms and pathogens in the body that have a low pH. With its popularity rising (due to profoundly positive results that many have reported), it has far not been subject to FDA restriction. DMSO, on the other hand, has been around and extensively studied for over fifty years, and has shown itself to effectively facilitate healing outcomes in a long list of chronic conditions, including inflammation, arthritis, clots, headaches, strokes, cancer, and many more. Yet, the FDA approves it for very narrowly defined human use, none of which have to do with any of the conditions it has proven itself to address.
In addition to being effective, both MMS and DMSO are refreshingly inexpensive. They help improve health without breaking the bank.
By way of contrast, Coumadin and Aspartame both enjoy FDA approval, yet the former started its life as a rat poison, and still acts as a toxin within the human body. Aspartame has been associated with a long list of chronic conditions. Aspartame and Coumadin are acceptedtools of modern society, via food preparation and medical industries. MMS and DMSO demonstrate profound healing qualities, yet they continue to be accessed surreptitiously, spoken of in hushed tones, and used at one’s own risk. Truth is, using products that actually work to our benefit risks the financial well-being of the industry that the FDA also “protects,” that is, pharmaceutical manufacturers.
In spite of the scope of the FDA’s jurisdiction, there are no laws that say we must live with the diseases that are born of environmental and chemical toxicity. While we spend billions of dollars each year seeking to “protect” ourselves from the next virus or bacteria “du jour,” we are open books to chemicals that are delivered by people, institutions, and agencies we believe are working on our behalf. Do they know what they’re doing? I don’t know the answer to that question. However, I know that it’s time that we know what they are doing, and know our birthright.
When you know who and what you are, how your body works and what it needs, you’ve got nothing to fear. The constant state of healing is assured, as is health, which is Nature’s Gift to ourselves.
