This is Finals Week, for post-production of Understanding MMS: Conversations with Jim Humble. Today we should complete the Spanish translation for the alternate audio track. Frances and Dimitri transcribed the entire soundtrack to facilitate their researched for proper terminology and word usage.
I have come up with the final front cover design. It brings Jim Humble from myth, to reality, promising to help you get your own feel for the man as well as the chemistry.
Marion Meadows has made a marvelous “bed” of music to caress and support the voice soundtrack, some of which you’ll be able to see and listen to later this week when I upload some new preview clips. He used Saggio’s music, some music from his own library, and various other musical effects, but did not “showcase” himself. I would have been fine with that, but I can only describe what he did as masterful. Better still, he wants to get together with Saggio and make some music, and I’ll schedule it on a future edition of Talk For Food!
He finished it at 3 am last Friday morning before heading off later that day for a two night performance at Arturo Sandoval’s club in Miami.
A few of the passages that he created brought tears to my eyes. The opening is haunting and impactful, as is the closing, which is rich in emotion and musical texture. He’s now ready to work on the next one.
After the translation recording is completed, everything will be in place to finalize the project, including an insert that will be inside the DVD packaging to introduce you to several companies that either sell MMS, or have complementary products. I’ll share the designs here when they are finalized.
I have more to say on another subject, but that will require its own post.
for the MMS solution do I add the 9to1 dilution in with the MMS water
Dear Adam,
I believe that your statements are sincere. And in your sincerity, my position appears inconsistent, even contradictory to you. Yet you don’t apparently see your own. You say that you won’t believe… you choose not to believe that MMS can be the legitimate, effective therapeutic agent that it has been touted to be unless a group of investigators that you feel are legitimate have given it the seal of approval, and their findings have been published in a journal that you believe is above reproach. You choose not to believe — not to be OPEN and USE YOUR OWN JUDGMENT IN THE AFFIRMATIVE — if these specific criteria are not met. That is your prerogative.
That is also the prerogative of every human being. A mind that is closed one day, can be open the next. But one thing is certain, a closed mind cannot be pried open.
A review by a specific group or publication in a journal is not what makes MMS work or not. The researchers wouldn’t be making the MMS work, they would be observing its behavior and effects, and then reporting it. The publisher would be taking what the researchers have observed and recorded it for its reading audience. The core issue of whether it works and how is independent of these factors.
We have also witnessed numerous situations where truly beneficial products and methods have been suppressed, their developers discredited, incarcerated, or worse. Mainstream medical science is not unbiased and unblinking as it might be thought in the ideal. You may disagree, but the evidence I’ve seen suggests otherwise.
There is plenty of information available on MMS, written by authors of some repute, plenty enough for scientists to read and consider, and publications to report on. Some have, and more will. But people who are in the throws of life-affecting medical decisions have to make decisions based on the best available information. They won’t rely solely on my word, if at all, but on that of a number of sources. It’s their choice that is important, because they WILL live by it. My only responsibility is to present the truth to my highest understanding of it, which should be corroborated by in-kind results. I respect the right of the reader to agree, or disagree, to seek more information or move on, to act, or not.
In this, there’s no inconsistency.
“Adam” seems to be in the business of providing clinical data management services to the pharmaceutical industry, and also consultations. While this doesn’t in any way detract from his right to agree or disagree and all the other rights you enumerate above, it is interesting that he doesn’t voluntarily disclose his ties to the pharmaceutical industry in his comments, at least not the ones I’ve read.
Neither does it mean he’s not a sincere person, but it does cast a certain jaded light on his accusations that other people have a conflict of interest where MMS and other alternative medicines that potentially threaten his clients are concerned.
Your question is somewhat vague. If you’re talking about the citric acid (9-1 solution)… that would be a 10% concentration of citric acid. You would add 5 drops of that for every drop of MMS. If you use a 50% solution of citric acid, you combine with the MMS on a 1:1, drop for drop basis.
If I am correct Jim Humble uses a 10% citric acid solution to activate the MMS.
To make that 10% citric acid solution Mr. Humble mixed:
1 part citric acid + 9 parts water that = 10 parts “total”.
With that being said, 1 part of that 10 part “total” is citric acid and that gives you a 10% citric acid solution.
10% of 10 parts is 1 part.
For example:
1 teaspoon of citric acid + 9 teaspoons of water would make a 10% citric acid solution.
Why?
Because 10 teaspoons were used in “total” to create that solution. If you put 1 teaspoon of citric acid into an empty glass and then put another 9 teaspoons of water into that same glass you now have a combined “total” of 10 teaspoons in that same glass. 1 teaspoon + 9 teaspoons = 10 teaspoons in total.
And since 1 teaspoon of that 10 teaspoon “total” is citric acid, that gives you a 10% citric acid solution.
10% of 10 teaspoons is one teaspoon. Just multiply 10% by 10 and you will get one.
1 teaspoon would be citric acid and the remaining 9 teaspoons would be water. You now have Mr. Humble’s 10% citric acid solution.
I may be wrong though. If so I have been doing it wrong. Hopefully Adam can clarify this.
PLEASE
I am taking MMS but have a question.
When you mix 1 part citric acid with 9 parts water you get a 9:1 mixture, not a 10:1 mixture.
Am I correct or is the book correct?
I have contacted several MENSA members and a chemistry teacher. They all agree that the book is wrong!
Please let us know
Thank you.